Comparing teacher noticing on paper and pencil and technology tasks

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kayla Chandler
{"title":"Comparing teacher noticing on paper and pencil and technology tasks","authors":"Kayla Chandler","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Work in teacher noticing has captured to what extent teachers notice students' thinking on paper and pencil tasks and technology tasks, yet no one study has considered how the same group of teachers notices across task types. This study used Jacobs et al.'s (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2010, 41(2), pp: 169–202.) professional noticing of students' thinking framework to guide the design and analysis of prospective secondary mathematics teachers' (PSMTs) noticing of high school students' thinking on two geometry tasks: a paper and pencil task and a technology task. High school students' written work and a video clip were shared as the artifacts from which to notice for each task. PSMTs responded to a set of noticing prompts to capture how they were attending, interpreting, and deciding to respond to students' thinking for each task. Their written responses to these questions were then open coded for each noticing component and codes from each task were compared to reveal any differences in the content of PSMTs' noticing across task types. Results revealed differences between tasks for each component skill of noticing. Implications of these findings for mathematics teacher educators and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Work in teacher noticing has captured to what extent teachers notice students' thinking on paper and pencil tasks and technology tasks, yet no one study has considered how the same group of teachers notices across task types. This study used Jacobs et al.'s (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2010, 41(2), pp: 169–202.) professional noticing of students' thinking framework to guide the design and analysis of prospective secondary mathematics teachers' (PSMTs) noticing of high school students' thinking on two geometry tasks: a paper and pencil task and a technology task. High school students' written work and a video clip were shared as the artifacts from which to notice for each task. PSMTs responded to a set of noticing prompts to capture how they were attending, interpreting, and deciding to respond to students' thinking for each task. Their written responses to these questions were then open coded for each noticing component and codes from each task were compared to reveal any differences in the content of PSMTs' noticing across task types. Results revealed differences between tasks for each component skill of noticing. Implications of these findings for mathematics teacher educators and future research are discussed.
比较教师注意纸笔和技术任务
关于教师注意的工作已经捕捉到了教师在多大程度上注意到学生在纸笔任务和技术任务上的思考,但没有一项研究考虑过同一组教师如何注意到不同类型的任务。本研究采用Jacobs et al. (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2010, 41(2), pp: 169-202 .)对学生思维框架的专业注意,来指导准中学数学教师(PSMTs)对高中生在纸笔任务和技术任务两个几何任务上思维的注意设计和分析。高中学生的书面作业和一段视频片段被分享为每个任务需要注意的人工制品。psmt对一组注意提示作出反应,以捕捉他们如何参与、解释和决定响应学生对每个任务的思考。然后,他们对这些问题的书面回答对每个注意成分进行开放编码,并比较每个任务的代码,以揭示psmt在不同任务类型的注意内容中的差异。结果显示,注意技能的每个组成部分在任务之间存在差异。本文还讨论了这些发现对数学教师教育者和未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信