Bland Embolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocarcinoma

Alfonso Jose Holguín Holguín, Juan Sebastián Toro Gutierrez, Luis Alfonso Bustamante-Cristancho, Tatiana Alvarez Saa, Juan C. Camacho
{"title":"Bland Embolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocarcinoma","authors":"Alfonso Jose Holguín Holguín, Juan Sebastián Toro Gutierrez, Luis Alfonso Bustamante-Cristancho, Tatiana Alvarez Saa, Juan C. Camacho","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in patients with cirrhosis. Eighty percent of cases worldwide are due to infections with hepatitis B and C viruses, but nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is projected to be an important etiology. It is usually diagnosed in advanced stages, only 15% of patients are surgical candidates, and up to 35% can receive only supportive care. This pathology has changed over time with the significant advances in treatment alternatives that can improve life expectancy for patients who are not surgical candidates. Therapeutic alternatives are available based on staging according to different models and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Systemic pharmacological options (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and hormonal therapy), surgical options, and locoregional therapies have been developed; all these interventions have been directed to increase the life expectancy of some patients with variable results. Regional therapies include transarterial embolization (TAE) or bland embolization, transarterial infusion chemotherapy, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and transarterial radioembolization, with no substantial difference in outcomes between patients treated with TACE and those receiving DEB-TACE, but benefits of lower systemic adverse effects and improved of quality-adjusted life years measure with DEB-TACE. With the addition of immunotherapy to these interventions, the outcomes are expected to be even more impactful on main outcomes such as survival and disease-free survival.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in patients with cirrhosis. Eighty percent of cases worldwide are due to infections with hepatitis B and C viruses, but nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is projected to be an important etiology. It is usually diagnosed in advanced stages, only 15% of patients are surgical candidates, and up to 35% can receive only supportive care. This pathology has changed over time with the significant advances in treatment alternatives that can improve life expectancy for patients who are not surgical candidates. Therapeutic alternatives are available based on staging according to different models and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Systemic pharmacological options (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and hormonal therapy), surgical options, and locoregional therapies have been developed; all these interventions have been directed to increase the life expectancy of some patients with variable results. Regional therapies include transarterial embolization (TAE) or bland embolization, transarterial infusion chemotherapy, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and transarterial radioembolization, with no substantial difference in outcomes between patients treated with TACE and those receiving DEB-TACE, but benefits of lower systemic adverse effects and improved of quality-adjusted life years measure with DEB-TACE. With the addition of immunotherapy to these interventions, the outcomes are expected to be even more impactful on main outcomes such as survival and disease-free survival.
温和栓塞和经动脉化疗栓塞在肝癌中的应用
肝癌(HCC)是世界范围内肝硬化患者发病和死亡的主要原因。全世界80%的病例是由于乙型和丙型肝炎病毒感染,但非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)预计是一个重要的病因。它通常在晚期被诊断出来,只有15%的患者需要手术治疗,高达35%的患者只能接受支持性治疗。随着时间的推移,随着治疗方案的显著进步,这种病理已经发生了变化,这些治疗方案可以提高不需要手术的患者的预期寿命。根据不同的模型和巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期系统,可根据分期提供治疗方案。系统药物选择(新辅助、辅助和激素治疗)、手术选择和局部治疗已经开发出来;所有这些干预措施都是为了增加一些患者的预期寿命,结果不一。局部治疗包括经动脉栓塞(TAE)或温和栓塞、经动脉输注化疗、常规经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)、药物洗脱头经动脉化疗栓塞(DEB-TACE)和经动脉放射栓塞,在接受TACE治疗和接受debtace治疗的患者之间的结果没有实质性差异,但debtace治疗的全身不良反应降低,改善了质量调整生命年。随着这些干预措施中加入免疫治疗,预计结果将对主要结局(如生存和无病生存)产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信