Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces

Manjit Singh Sidhu, Jee Geak Ying
{"title":"Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces","authors":"Manjit Singh Sidhu, Jee Geak Ying","doi":"10.1177/03064190231205415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students’ preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI.","PeriodicalId":75028,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231205415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students’ preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI.
增强工程教育中的用户体验和可用性:多功能和有形用户界面的比较分析
Tenaga国立大学进行了一项研究,比较了工科学生在使用增强现实技术用户界面(UI)应用程序解决选定工程问题时的偏好。该研究在受控环境中采用了横断面设计和Wilcoxon符号秩检验方法来分析工程应用排名的差异。研究还测量了可学习性,并使用用户交互满意度问卷评估了软件质量。对工科学生来说,多功能UI比有形用户界面(TUI)更有效。该研究提供了可靠的证据,证明多功能用户界面是工程教育中比用户界面更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信