Engagement of Persons with Dementia in Public Consultations: Process Evaluation

Laura Garcia Diaz, Evelyne Durocher, Paula Gardner, Carrie McAiney, Lori Letts
{"title":"Engagement of Persons with Dementia in Public Consultations: Process Evaluation","authors":"Laura Garcia Diaz, Evelyne Durocher, Paula Gardner, Carrie McAiney, Lori Letts","doi":"10.54656/jces.v15i2.449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engagement of persons living with dementia in public consultations is central to the development of dementia-friendly communities (DFC). However, due to a lack of resources and expertise in how to support their involvement, persons living with dementia are not always involved in processes for planning the development and implementation of DFC initiatives. To better understand processes and methods that facilitate the engagement of persons living with dementia in public consultations, we evaluated the public consultation processes of a Canadian DFC initiative. A partially mixed-methods sequential equal status design guided this process evaluation. Data sources included surveys completed by public consultation participants, focus groups with members of the group that led the public consultation process, and the report that outlines consultation findings. Study results highlight the strengths and limitations of the public consultations and include recommendations for engaging persons living with dementia in public consultations. Results emphasize the importance of including persons living with dementia in DFC initiatives as project partners and public consultation participants.","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v15i2.449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engagement of persons living with dementia in public consultations is central to the development of dementia-friendly communities (DFC). However, due to a lack of resources and expertise in how to support their involvement, persons living with dementia are not always involved in processes for planning the development and implementation of DFC initiatives. To better understand processes and methods that facilitate the engagement of persons living with dementia in public consultations, we evaluated the public consultation processes of a Canadian DFC initiative. A partially mixed-methods sequential equal status design guided this process evaluation. Data sources included surveys completed by public consultation participants, focus groups with members of the group that led the public consultation process, and the report that outlines consultation findings. Study results highlight the strengths and limitations of the public consultations and include recommendations for engaging persons living with dementia in public consultations. Results emphasize the importance of including persons living with dementia in DFC initiatives as project partners and public consultation participants.
痴呆症患者参与公众咨询:过程评估
让痴呆症患者参与公共磋商对于发展痴呆症友好社区至关重要。然而,由于缺乏支持他们参与的资源和专业知识,痴呆症患者并不总是参与规划发展和实施DFC倡议的过程。为了更好地了解促进痴呆症患者参与公共咨询的过程和方法,我们评估了加拿大DFC倡议的公共咨询过程。采用部分混合方法的顺序等状态设计指导工艺评价。数据来源包括由公众咨询参与者完成的调查、由领导公众咨询过程的小组成员组成的焦点小组,以及概述咨询结果的报告。研究结果强调了公共磋商的优势和局限性,并提出了让痴呆症患者参与公共磋商的建议。结果强调了将痴呆症患者作为项目合作伙伴和公众咨询参与者纳入DFC倡议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信