Deontic authority-based resolution of deontic right-based resistance in online medical consultation

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Minwen Wei, Yongping Ran
{"title":"Deontic authority-based resolution of deontic right-based resistance in online medical consultation","authors":"Minwen Wei, Yongping Ran","doi":"10.1075/ps.21033.wei","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous research has investigated aspects of deontics, epistemics, and resistance in medical settings. However, few have focused on deontics and how resistance shapes the responses of deontic authority ( Stivers and Timmermans 2020 ), especially in online medical counseling. Utilizing the data collected from online medical consultation and adopting a discursive approach, this study investigates how doctors deploy deontic authority to resolve caregivers’ deontic right-based resistance. It is found that caregivers’ deontic right-based resistance comprises two major categories: strong deontic right-based resistance and weak deontic right-based resistance. Accordingly, doctors tend to use strong deontic authority to resolve caregivers’ strong deontic right-based resistance and mitigated deontic authority to resolve weak one. Because doctors’ deontic authority is particularly vulnerable in online contexts, it is proposed that doctors value their deontic authority in the decision-making of a treatment plan, which they manifest by protecting their deontic authority when their deontic territory is invaded.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21033.wei","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Previous research has investigated aspects of deontics, epistemics, and resistance in medical settings. However, few have focused on deontics and how resistance shapes the responses of deontic authority ( Stivers and Timmermans 2020 ), especially in online medical counseling. Utilizing the data collected from online medical consultation and adopting a discursive approach, this study investigates how doctors deploy deontic authority to resolve caregivers’ deontic right-based resistance. It is found that caregivers’ deontic right-based resistance comprises two major categories: strong deontic right-based resistance and weak deontic right-based resistance. Accordingly, doctors tend to use strong deontic authority to resolve caregivers’ strong deontic right-based resistance and mitigated deontic authority to resolve weak one. Because doctors’ deontic authority is particularly vulnerable in online contexts, it is proposed that doctors value their deontic authority in the decision-making of a treatment plan, which they manifest by protecting their deontic authority when their deontic territory is invaded.
基于道义权威的在线医疗咨询道义权利抵抗的消解
摘要以前的研究已经调查了道义、认识论和医学环境中的抵抗方面。然而,很少有人关注道义以及抵抗如何塑造道义权威的反应(Stivers和Timmermans 2020),特别是在在线医疗咨询中。利用从在线医疗咨询中收集的数据,采用话语方法,本研究调查了医生如何部署道义权威来解决护理人员基于道义权利的抵抗。研究发现,照顾者的道义权利抵抗分为两大类:强烈的道义权利抵抗和弱的道义权利抵抗。因此,医生倾向于用强道义权威来解决照顾者的强道义权利抵抗,用缓和道义权威来解决弱道义权利抵抗。由于医生的道义权威在网络环境中特别脆弱,因此我们建议医生在制定治疗方案时重视自己的道义权威,当道义领域受到侵犯时,医生会保护自己的道义权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信