Loathed It: Ball Four

William J. Ryczek
{"title":"Loathed It: Ball Four","authors":"William J. Ryczek","doi":"10.1353/nin.2023.a903310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loathed It:Ball Four William J. Ryczek (bio) Blasphemers are valuable members of society. Nearly every major revolution in the history of the world has been started by someone who challenged widely accepted dogma. I don't claim to be Martin Luther nailing his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg, but I do think it's time everyone stopped genuflecting before Jim Bouton and Ball Four. Some people, including Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and veteran columnist Dick Young, didn't like the book from the moment the first excerpts appeared; Young famously referred to Bouton as a \"social leper.\"1 That was to be expected, for Kuhn viewed himself as the guardian of baseball's morals, while Young was a brash young writer who'd become a crotchety old defender of the sporting establishment. But there were others who took great offense at Ball Four, many of whom wore spiked shoes and stirruped hose. If Bouton wasn't a social leper in major league locker rooms before he wrote his book, he certainly became one afterward. I interviewed more than fifty men who played for the Yankees during the 1960s, and while most had fond memories of their former teammates, two were almost universally disliked. One was pitcher Jim Coates, an abrasive hillbilly who threw at batters' heads with intent to maim. The other was Bouton. Some old Yankees had never liked him, and some were angry because of what he wrote about them. Most, however, were upset by what he wrote about their hero, Mickey Mantle. Mantle was idolized by many of his teammates who gloried in his company and even named their sons after him. \"Mickey liked me,\" was a phrase I heard proudly from several players, and being liked by Mickey was one of the highlights of their lives. I don't share their anger in that regard. Bouton destroyed the previous image of Mantle, but that image was a false one, and there's nothing wrong with toppling a false idol. The Mantle Bouton portrayed in Ball Four is consistent with what I learned while researching a book on the Yankees. Mickey was a great teammate, popular in the clubhouse, possessor of a quick wit, and one [End Page 11] of the best baseball players of all time. He was also frequently surly and rude with the public, a world-class womanizer, and a mean drunk. While many Yankees hated Bouton for what he wrote about Mantle, Joe Pepitone was upset because Bouton talked about everyone else's sexual infidelities but didn't mention his own. No one knows more about the sexual activity of a major league baseball player than Joseph Anthony Pepitone, who hit on my biggest problem with Ball Four. It's okay to debunk a false image and replace it with the truth. It's not okay to debunk a false image and replace it with an equally false one. When discussing the credibility of Ball Four, let's start, as Pepitone suggests, with infidelity, a touchy subject in an \"honest\" memoir. Although Bouton later admitted he was unfaithful to his wife during his playing career,2 he portrayed himself in Ball Four as a faithful husband and regaled his readers with stories of others' infidelities. His friend Mike Marshall, who, according to his former wife, was a serial philanderer, called Bouton's ex–wife Bobbie after she and Bouton divorced. While attempting to seduce her, Marshall told her Bouton had been fooling around all along. To claim to have written an honest book, one that laid bare the most raw, personal weaknesses of others while painting a false picture of himself is disingenuous at best. Bouton might have excused the omission on the grounds that such a revelation would have been hurtful to his wife and damaging to his marriage, but the possibility of hurting others didn't concern him. Ball Four is a very opinionated work. Bouton portrays himself and his close friends, like Marshall and Steve Hovley, as intelligent, clever, and socially conscious. The reader learns that it wasn't easy being Jim Bouton since the unenlightened masses didn't understand him and management didn't appreciate him...","PeriodicalId":88065,"journal":{"name":"Ninety nine","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ninety nine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nin.2023.a903310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loathed It:Ball Four William J. Ryczek (bio) Blasphemers are valuable members of society. Nearly every major revolution in the history of the world has been started by someone who challenged widely accepted dogma. I don't claim to be Martin Luther nailing his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg, but I do think it's time everyone stopped genuflecting before Jim Bouton and Ball Four. Some people, including Commissioner Bowie Kuhn and veteran columnist Dick Young, didn't like the book from the moment the first excerpts appeared; Young famously referred to Bouton as a "social leper."1 That was to be expected, for Kuhn viewed himself as the guardian of baseball's morals, while Young was a brash young writer who'd become a crotchety old defender of the sporting establishment. But there were others who took great offense at Ball Four, many of whom wore spiked shoes and stirruped hose. If Bouton wasn't a social leper in major league locker rooms before he wrote his book, he certainly became one afterward. I interviewed more than fifty men who played for the Yankees during the 1960s, and while most had fond memories of their former teammates, two were almost universally disliked. One was pitcher Jim Coates, an abrasive hillbilly who threw at batters' heads with intent to maim. The other was Bouton. Some old Yankees had never liked him, and some were angry because of what he wrote about them. Most, however, were upset by what he wrote about their hero, Mickey Mantle. Mantle was idolized by many of his teammates who gloried in his company and even named their sons after him. "Mickey liked me," was a phrase I heard proudly from several players, and being liked by Mickey was one of the highlights of their lives. I don't share their anger in that regard. Bouton destroyed the previous image of Mantle, but that image was a false one, and there's nothing wrong with toppling a false idol. The Mantle Bouton portrayed in Ball Four is consistent with what I learned while researching a book on the Yankees. Mickey was a great teammate, popular in the clubhouse, possessor of a quick wit, and one [End Page 11] of the best baseball players of all time. He was also frequently surly and rude with the public, a world-class womanizer, and a mean drunk. While many Yankees hated Bouton for what he wrote about Mantle, Joe Pepitone was upset because Bouton talked about everyone else's sexual infidelities but didn't mention his own. No one knows more about the sexual activity of a major league baseball player than Joseph Anthony Pepitone, who hit on my biggest problem with Ball Four. It's okay to debunk a false image and replace it with the truth. It's not okay to debunk a false image and replace it with an equally false one. When discussing the credibility of Ball Four, let's start, as Pepitone suggests, with infidelity, a touchy subject in an "honest" memoir. Although Bouton later admitted he was unfaithful to his wife during his playing career,2 he portrayed himself in Ball Four as a faithful husband and regaled his readers with stories of others' infidelities. His friend Mike Marshall, who, according to his former wife, was a serial philanderer, called Bouton's ex–wife Bobbie after she and Bouton divorced. While attempting to seduce her, Marshall told her Bouton had been fooling around all along. To claim to have written an honest book, one that laid bare the most raw, personal weaknesses of others while painting a false picture of himself is disingenuous at best. Bouton might have excused the omission on the grounds that such a revelation would have been hurtful to his wife and damaging to his marriage, but the possibility of hurting others didn't concern him. Ball Four is a very opinionated work. Bouton portrays himself and his close friends, like Marshall and Steve Hovley, as intelligent, clever, and socially conscious. The reader learns that it wasn't easy being Jim Bouton since the unenlightened masses didn't understand him and management didn't appreciate him...
讨厌它:四号球
亵渎者是有价值的社会成员。世界历史上几乎每一次重大的革命都是由挑战被广泛接受的教条的人开始的。我并不是说我是把《九十五条论纲》钉在维滕贝格教堂门上的马丁·路德,但我确实认为,是时候让大家停止在吉姆·伯顿和鲍尔四世面前卑躬屈膝了。一些人,包括专员鲍伊·库恩和资深专栏作家迪克·杨,从第一次摘录出现的那一刻起就不喜欢这本书;杨曾把鲍顿称为“社会麻风病人”。这是意料之中的,因为库恩认为自己是棒球道德的守护者,而杨则是一个傲慢的年轻作家,后来变成了一个脾气古怪的老体育界的捍卫者。但也有其他人对四号球非常反感,其中许多人穿着带刺的鞋子和带马镫的长筒袜。如果鲍顿在写这本书之前在大联盟的更衣室里不是一个社交麻风病人,那么在他写完这本书之后,他肯定成了一个。我采访了上世纪60年代效力于洋基队的50多名男子,虽然大多数人对他们的前队友都有美好的回忆,但有两个人几乎普遍不受欢迎。其中一个是投手吉姆·科茨(Jim Coates),一个粗鲁的乡巴佬,他向击球手的头部投掷,意图致残。另一个是鲍顿。有些老北方佬从来就不喜欢他,有些还因为他写的那些关于他们的文章而生气。然而,大多数人对他写的关于他们的英雄米奇·曼特尔的文章感到不安。曼特尔是他的许多队友的偶像,他们在他的公司里感到光荣,甚至用他的名字给他们的儿子命名。“米奇喜欢我”,这是我从几个球员那里自豪地听到的一句话,被米奇喜欢是他们生活中的亮点之一。我不同意他们在这方面的愤怒。波顿摧毁了曼特尔之前的形象,但那是一个虚假的形象,推翻一个虚假的偶像并没有什么错。《第四球》中所描绘的曼特尔·布顿与我在研究一本关于洋基队的书时所学到的一致。米奇是一个伟大的队友,在俱乐部里很受欢迎,机智过人,是有史以来最好的棒球运动员之一。他还经常对公众粗暴无礼,是一个世界级的好色之徒,也是一个刻薄的酒鬼。虽然许多洋基队都因为鲍顿写的关于曼特尔的文章而讨厌他,但乔·佩皮托内却因为鲍顿谈论其他人的性不忠而不提自己的性不忠而感到不安。没有人比约瑟夫·安东尼·佩皮托内更了解大联盟棒球运动员的性行为了,他抓住了我对第四球最大的问题。揭穿一个错误的形象,用事实取而代之是可以的。揭穿一个错误的形象,用一个同样错误的形象来代替它是不对的。在讨论四号球的可信度时,让我们像佩皮托内建议的那样,从不忠开始,这是一本“诚实的”回忆录中的敏感话题。尽管鲍顿后来承认他在职业生涯中对妻子不忠,但他在《第四球》中把自己描绘成一个忠诚的丈夫,并用别人不忠的故事来取悦读者。他的朋友迈克·马歇尔,据他的前妻说,是一个风流成性的人,在鲍顿的前妻和鲍顿离婚后给她打电话。在试图勾引她的时候,马歇尔告诉她布顿一直在鬼混。声称自己写的是一本诚实的书,这本书揭露了他人最原始的个人弱点,同时给自己描绘了一幅虚假的画面,这是最虚伪的。鲍顿可能会原谅他的疏忽,因为这样的揭露会伤害他的妻子,破坏他的婚姻,但伤害别人的可能性他并不关心。《第四球》是一部非常固执己见的作品。鲍顿把自己和他的亲密朋友,如马歇尔和史蒂夫·霍夫利,描绘成聪明、聪明、有社会意识的人。读者了解到,当吉姆·伯顿并不容易,因为无知的大众不理解他,管理层也不欣赏他……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信