Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating by Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour (review)

Ed Edmonds
{"title":"Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating by Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour (review)","authors":"Ed Edmonds","doi":"10.1353/nin.2023.a903327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating by Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour Ed Edmonds Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour. Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating. Seattle, WA: Clyde Hill Publishing, 2022. 258 pp. Paperback, $24.99. Dan Levitt and Mark Armour, who have previously collaborated on two outstanding books on the building of winning Major League Baseball franchises, have turned their powers of fresh and thoughtful observations, added tremendous research, and combined it with excellent writing to produce an engaging take on an interesting thesis—when does innovation create an opportunity to cheat and gain an advantage over your opponent? Even though the origin of baseball has spawned many theories and explanations, one thing is certain—players [End Page 137] and management have consistently cheated or, at a minimum, pushed beyond the outer limits of the \"rules\" (both official and unwritten) to gain an edge over an opponent. Some \"cheating\" is actually applauded and honored while other \"cheating\" behavior is disliked and even loathed. Levitt and Armour's book explores, in detail, this long history while also investigating the different reactions by players, management, and fans. First and quite importantly, Levitt and Armour set out their thesis and their definition of cheating clearly for their readers—\"We broadly define 'cheating' as an act of breaking agreed-upon rules in order to help your team win. By this reckoning, throwing a World Series or recreational drug use, which do not help your team, are not 'cheating' as defined here\" (x). The authors use an effective concept of naming doctrines after players, managers, or coaches who embody a response to their thesis. The first one is named for Rogers Hornsby—\"Baseball players and others within the game will and should find ways to bend and break the rules. It is the job of the authorities to stop them.\" (ix). This establishes an interesting dichotomy at the heart of the conversation. Players should try anything and everything either on the edge of or clearly outside of the rules. It is the jobs of umpires or league officials to detect such behavior and punish or discipline as appropriate. The initial chapter focuses on deception, typically involving attempts to fool the umpire, e.g., a fielder acting as if he caught the ball when he had trapped it, a batter claiming he was hit by a pitch when he was not, or a catcher's practice of pitch framing where he tries to convince the umpire that a pitch that is a ball is a strike. An early example of this was the rule requiring that pitchers throw underhanded and keep their release point at or below their hip. Pitchers, knowing that an overhand delivery was harder to hit, pushed the definition of underhanded in various ways, and some pitchers resorted to hiking up their pants to fool the umpire and the batter. Ultimately, the rules were simply changed to allow overhand pitching. The second chapter concentrates on the use of binoculars and telescopes to steal signs. When German optical manufacturer Zeiss started selling improved prism binoculars in 1894, Phillies catcher Morgan Murphy, nearing the end of his career just five years later, used an expensive pair to decode the opposing team's signs and relay the information from the manager's suite in centerfield to the batter. Later in the book Levitt and Armour discuss the use of advanced video analytics allowing a pitcher to experiment with different sticky substances or grips to improve the hurler's ability to increase swings-and-misses or weaker hits. One particularly effective use of a sticky substance [End Page 138] from another sports setting is the use of Spider Tack, created to help strongmen lift Atlas Stones and to improve a pitcher's grip, increasing spin rates and late ball movement. In the aftermath of the Astros trashcan banging, sign-stealing scandal, Commissioner Rob Manfred finally increased efforts to detect and punish pitchers who were doctoring the baseball, a nod to the author's Hornsby Doctrine. Chapter five focuses on bat modifications—corking bats to lighten weight, adding nails or other metal to increase weight, grooving the...","PeriodicalId":88065,"journal":{"name":"Ninety nine","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ninety nine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nin.2023.a903327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating by Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour Ed Edmonds Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour. Intentional Balk: Baseball's Thin Line Between Innovation and Cheating. Seattle, WA: Clyde Hill Publishing, 2022. 258 pp. Paperback, $24.99. Dan Levitt and Mark Armour, who have previously collaborated on two outstanding books on the building of winning Major League Baseball franchises, have turned their powers of fresh and thoughtful observations, added tremendous research, and combined it with excellent writing to produce an engaging take on an interesting thesis—when does innovation create an opportunity to cheat and gain an advantage over your opponent? Even though the origin of baseball has spawned many theories and explanations, one thing is certain—players [End Page 137] and management have consistently cheated or, at a minimum, pushed beyond the outer limits of the "rules" (both official and unwritten) to gain an edge over an opponent. Some "cheating" is actually applauded and honored while other "cheating" behavior is disliked and even loathed. Levitt and Armour's book explores, in detail, this long history while also investigating the different reactions by players, management, and fans. First and quite importantly, Levitt and Armour set out their thesis and their definition of cheating clearly for their readers—"We broadly define 'cheating' as an act of breaking agreed-upon rules in order to help your team win. By this reckoning, throwing a World Series or recreational drug use, which do not help your team, are not 'cheating' as defined here" (x). The authors use an effective concept of naming doctrines after players, managers, or coaches who embody a response to their thesis. The first one is named for Rogers Hornsby—"Baseball players and others within the game will and should find ways to bend and break the rules. It is the job of the authorities to stop them." (ix). This establishes an interesting dichotomy at the heart of the conversation. Players should try anything and everything either on the edge of or clearly outside of the rules. It is the jobs of umpires or league officials to detect such behavior and punish or discipline as appropriate. The initial chapter focuses on deception, typically involving attempts to fool the umpire, e.g., a fielder acting as if he caught the ball when he had trapped it, a batter claiming he was hit by a pitch when he was not, or a catcher's practice of pitch framing where he tries to convince the umpire that a pitch that is a ball is a strike. An early example of this was the rule requiring that pitchers throw underhanded and keep their release point at or below their hip. Pitchers, knowing that an overhand delivery was harder to hit, pushed the definition of underhanded in various ways, and some pitchers resorted to hiking up their pants to fool the umpire and the batter. Ultimately, the rules were simply changed to allow overhand pitching. The second chapter concentrates on the use of binoculars and telescopes to steal signs. When German optical manufacturer Zeiss started selling improved prism binoculars in 1894, Phillies catcher Morgan Murphy, nearing the end of his career just five years later, used an expensive pair to decode the opposing team's signs and relay the information from the manager's suite in centerfield to the batter. Later in the book Levitt and Armour discuss the use of advanced video analytics allowing a pitcher to experiment with different sticky substances or grips to improve the hurler's ability to increase swings-and-misses or weaker hits. One particularly effective use of a sticky substance [End Page 138] from another sports setting is the use of Spider Tack, created to help strongmen lift Atlas Stones and to improve a pitcher's grip, increasing spin rates and late ball movement. In the aftermath of the Astros trashcan banging, sign-stealing scandal, Commissioner Rob Manfred finally increased efforts to detect and punish pitchers who were doctoring the baseball, a nod to the author's Hornsby Doctrine. Chapter five focuses on bat modifications—corking bats to lighten weight, adding nails or other metal to increase weight, grooving the...
《故意阻挡:棒球在创新和欺骗之间的微妙界限》丹尼尔·r·莱维特著;马克·阿穆尔(回顾)
作者:Daniel R. Levitt & Mark Armour的《故意的阻碍:棒球在创新和欺骗之间的细线》故意的阻碍:棒球在创新和欺骗之间的界限。西雅图,华盛顿州:克莱德希尔出版社,2022。258页,平装本,24.99美元。Dan Levitt和Mark Armour曾经合作过两本关于如何赢得美国职业棒球大联盟(Major League Baseball)特许经营的杰出著作,他们将自己新鲜而深思熟虑的观察能力,加上大量的研究,并将其与优秀的写作结合起来,写出了一本引人入胜的有趣论文——创新何时创造了欺骗和获得优势的机会?尽管棒球的起源产生了许多理论和解释,但有一点是肯定的——球员和管理层一直在作弊,或者至少是超越“规则”(无论是官方的还是不成文的)的外部限制,以获得对对手的优势。有些“作弊”行为实际上是受到赞扬和尊重的,而另一些“作弊”行为则是不受欢迎甚至厌恶的。莱维特和阿玛尔的书详细探讨了这段漫长的历史,同时也调查了球员、管理层和球迷的不同反应。首先,非常重要的是,Levitt和Armour为读者清楚地阐述了他们的论点和他们对作弊的定义——“我们将‘作弊’广义地定义为为了帮助你的团队获胜而违反既定规则的行为。这样看来,在世界职业棒球大赛(World Series)上作弊或服用娱乐性药物,这些对你的球队没有帮助的行为,就不是这里定义的‘作弊’”(x)。作者使用了一个有效的概念,即以体现对他们的论点的回应的球员、经理或教练的名字来命名理论。第一句是以罗杰斯·霍恩斯比的名字命名的——“棒球运动员和比赛中的其他人将会而且应该找到变通和打破规则的方法。当局的职责是阻止他们。”这在谈话的核心建立了一个有趣的二分法。玩家应该在规则的边缘或明显的规则之外尝试任何事情。裁判或联盟官员的工作是发现这种行为并适当地惩罚或纪律处分。第一章的重点是欺骗,通常涉及欺骗裁判的尝试,例如,一个外野手假装他抓住了球,但他已经抓住了它,一个击球手声称他被一个球击中了,但他没有,或者一个捕手的投球框架的做法,他试图说服裁判,一个球是一个打击。这方面的一个早期例子是规则要求投手用下手投球,并保持他们的释放点在臀部或以下。投手们知道上手球更难击中,他们以各种方式推动了“上手球”的定义,一些投手甚至抬高裤子来欺骗裁判和击球手。最终,规则被简单地改变为允许上手投球。第二章集中讨论了使用双筒望远镜和望远镜来窃取标志。1894年,当德国光学制造商蔡司(Zeiss)开始销售改进后的棱镜双筒望远镜时,费城人队(Phillies)的接球手摩根·墨菲(Morgan Murphy)使用了一副昂贵的双筒望远镜来解码对方球队的信号,并将信息从中场的经理套间传递给击球手。仅仅五年后,墨菲的职业生涯就接近尾声。在书的后面,Levitt和Armour讨论了高级视频分析的使用,允许投手实验不同的粘性物质或握把,以提高投手增加挥杆失误或较弱击球的能力。一种特别有效的使用黏性物质的方法是使用蜘蛛钉,这种方法来自另一种运动场景,用来帮助强壮的人举起阿特拉斯石,提高投手的握力,增加旋转速度和后期球的移动。在太空人队(Astros)砸垃圾桶、偷招牌丑闻之后,总裁罗布·曼弗雷德(Rob Manfred)终于加大了力度,以发现和惩罚那些在棒球比赛中作弊的投手,这是对作者的霍斯比主义(Hornsby Doctrine)的认可。第五章着重于球棒的改装——用软木塞填充球棒以减轻重量,添加钉子或其他金属以增加重量,在球棒上开槽……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信