Sounding the Slavery Debates: The Sonic Writing of Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison

Tony Papanikolas
{"title":"Sounding the Slavery Debates: The Sonic Writing of Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison","authors":"Tony Papanikolas","doi":"10.1353/arq.2023.a909147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article details how Frederick Douglass intervened on an extant catalogue of sonic imagery, descriptive reproductions of various sonic qualities of antislavery declamation that were deployed by abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison with the intention of soliciting an affective response in the reader. Analyzing the aural language that suffuses The Narrative of Frederick Douglass, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?,” and The Heroic Slave, and comparing and contrasting Douglass’s use of this language that of Garrison, this article contends that Douglass’ distinct sonic interventions made audible the limitations of a political affinity predicated on the cultivation of preexisting antislavery sentiments. Douglass’s revisions to, and embellishments upon, prevailing sonic antislavery rhetoric afforded him a sensuous, affecting language for conveying the need for the radical reorientation of moderate Northern sensibilities towards the disavowed interiority of the enslaved.","PeriodicalId":8384,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2023.a909147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article details how Frederick Douglass intervened on an extant catalogue of sonic imagery, descriptive reproductions of various sonic qualities of antislavery declamation that were deployed by abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison with the intention of soliciting an affective response in the reader. Analyzing the aural language that suffuses The Narrative of Frederick Douglass, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?,” and The Heroic Slave, and comparing and contrasting Douglass’s use of this language that of Garrison, this article contends that Douglass’ distinct sonic interventions made audible the limitations of a political affinity predicated on the cultivation of preexisting antislavery sentiments. Douglass’s revisions to, and embellishments upon, prevailing sonic antislavery rhetoric afforded him a sensuous, affecting language for conveying the need for the radical reorientation of moderate Northern sensibilities towards the disavowed interiority of the enslaved.
聆听奴隶制的辩论:弗雷德里克·道格拉斯和威廉·劳埃德·加里森的声音写作
摘要:本文详细介绍了弗雷德里克·道格拉斯如何干预现存的声音图像目录,这些声音图像是由废奴主义者威廉·劳埃德·加里森等人使用的各种反奴隶制宣言的声音质量的描述性复制品,目的是在读者中引起情感反应。分析弗雷德里克·道格拉斯的《7月4日对奴隶来说意味着什么?》,和英雄奴隶,并比较和对比道格拉斯对加里森语言的使用,这篇文章认为,道格拉斯独特的声音干预使人们能够听到基于先前存在的反奴隶制情绪培养的政治亲和力的局限性。道格拉斯对流行的反奴隶制言论的修改和修饰使他的语言具有感性和感染力来传达温和的北方情感对被剥夺的奴隶内在性的彻底重新定位的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信