Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis by Helga Thorson (review)

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis by Helga Thorson (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis by Helga Thorson Scott Spector Helga Thorson, Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis. Women and Gender in German Studies 9. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2022. 278 pp. In terms of the scope and originality of her contribution, Grete Meisel-Hess is a key figure in fin-de-siècle feminism, although she has hardly been recognized as such. One thing that Helga Thorson's new book, Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis, makes evident is how widely known Meisel-Hess was in her own lifetime and how much at the heartbeat of the shifting thinking of the period she remained in the first two decades of the twentieth century. A monograph in English dedicated specifically to her life and work was in this sense very much in order. The book is not chiefly a biography but a recounting of Meisel-Hess's varied cultural production (literary, scientific, and polemical) in the broad context of the movements, debates, and ambivalences of her time. One of this account's great strengths is the convincing [End Page 114] way it braids together these cultural contexts with Meisel-Hess's feminist and sociological thinking, her belletristic writing, and her life. In doing so, Thorson makes several strong and interlocking arguments. Meisel-Hess's intellectual disposition was strongly oriented toward the then rising idea of monism, or the unity of seemingly disparate things and refusal of essential binaries such as that of the ideal and the material; this was the ground of a potentially radical reconfiguration of gender relations. Like many others of her epoch, she was swept up in a sense that humanity was on the brink of an epic shift of ways of living to correspond with (or catch up to) new modes of understanding emergent in the last third of the previous century. Modernism (die Moderne was a term that encompassed this term as well as \"modernity\") promised to realize this potential; at the same time, the ways in which the social order was broken were seen to be a result of the rapid changes of modernity. Meisel-Hess's commitment to a major shift forward was an investment in the promise of the Moderne. In Thorson's reading, Meisel-Hess's Moderne, her feminism, and her Jewishness were of a piece. True to Meisel-Hess's own monist predilections, Thorson sees a breakdown of the boundary between author and work, such that the subject's own life is merged with her cultural contribution. The oft-discussed \"New Woman\" of the period is, in Thorson's book, both a discursive figure and an agent of change. Meisel-Hess, according to Thorson, represents and critically appraises the figure even as she fashions herself as a \"fervent\" New Woman with agency. In an equally provocative move, Thorson argues that the \"sexual crisis\" of Meisel-Hess's best-known title is not just an object of her analysis and critique, it comes to be the condition that entraps her and leads to her own demise. After a concise introduction of the subject and the author's intentions, Thorson begins with two chapters that focus on Meisel-Hess's engagement with the figure of the New Woman in literary and polemical work. These references to \"the New Woman\" as though it were a single and clear thing—a very particular figure with a specific look and signification—seems somewhat too reified, when the term in fact referred to many contradictory images, types, and fantasies. The thesis that Meisel-Hess herself had such an image in mind and consciously pursued it in her life is persuasive. Following Meisel-Hess as she moves to Berlin, Thorson then focuses on Die sexuelle Krise (1909) and other works. Here she makes some headway in dispelling the suspicion some readers may have that the book borders in places on hagiography. Most anyone who knows Meisel-Hess's chief works will have expected more than a [End Page 115] mention of the feminist's rather obvious reliance on Rassenhygiene. While this link is mentioned early on, it may seem to contemporary readers...","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis by Helga Thorson Scott Spector Helga Thorson, Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis. Women and Gender in German Studies 9. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2022. 278 pp. In terms of the scope and originality of her contribution, Grete Meisel-Hess is a key figure in fin-de-siècle feminism, although she has hardly been recognized as such. One thing that Helga Thorson's new book, Grete Meisel-Hess: The New Woman and the Sexual Crisis, makes evident is how widely known Meisel-Hess was in her own lifetime and how much at the heartbeat of the shifting thinking of the period she remained in the first two decades of the twentieth century. A monograph in English dedicated specifically to her life and work was in this sense very much in order. The book is not chiefly a biography but a recounting of Meisel-Hess's varied cultural production (literary, scientific, and polemical) in the broad context of the movements, debates, and ambivalences of her time. One of this account's great strengths is the convincing [End Page 114] way it braids together these cultural contexts with Meisel-Hess's feminist and sociological thinking, her belletristic writing, and her life. In doing so, Thorson makes several strong and interlocking arguments. Meisel-Hess's intellectual disposition was strongly oriented toward the then rising idea of monism, or the unity of seemingly disparate things and refusal of essential binaries such as that of the ideal and the material; this was the ground of a potentially radical reconfiguration of gender relations. Like many others of her epoch, she was swept up in a sense that humanity was on the brink of an epic shift of ways of living to correspond with (or catch up to) new modes of understanding emergent in the last third of the previous century. Modernism (die Moderne was a term that encompassed this term as well as "modernity") promised to realize this potential; at the same time, the ways in which the social order was broken were seen to be a result of the rapid changes of modernity. Meisel-Hess's commitment to a major shift forward was an investment in the promise of the Moderne. In Thorson's reading, Meisel-Hess's Moderne, her feminism, and her Jewishness were of a piece. True to Meisel-Hess's own monist predilections, Thorson sees a breakdown of the boundary between author and work, such that the subject's own life is merged with her cultural contribution. The oft-discussed "New Woman" of the period is, in Thorson's book, both a discursive figure and an agent of change. Meisel-Hess, according to Thorson, represents and critically appraises the figure even as she fashions herself as a "fervent" New Woman with agency. In an equally provocative move, Thorson argues that the "sexual crisis" of Meisel-Hess's best-known title is not just an object of her analysis and critique, it comes to be the condition that entraps her and leads to her own demise. After a concise introduction of the subject and the author's intentions, Thorson begins with two chapters that focus on Meisel-Hess's engagement with the figure of the New Woman in literary and polemical work. These references to "the New Woman" as though it were a single and clear thing—a very particular figure with a specific look and signification—seems somewhat too reified, when the term in fact referred to many contradictory images, types, and fantasies. The thesis that Meisel-Hess herself had such an image in mind and consciously pursued it in her life is persuasive. Following Meisel-Hess as she moves to Berlin, Thorson then focuses on Die sexuelle Krise (1909) and other works. Here she makes some headway in dispelling the suspicion some readers may have that the book borders in places on hagiography. Most anyone who knows Meisel-Hess's chief works will have expected more than a [End Page 115] mention of the feminist's rather obvious reliance on Rassenhygiene. While this link is mentioned early on, it may seem to contemporary readers...
格蕾特·梅塞尔-赫斯:《新女性与性危机》,作者:海尔加·索尔森(书评)
作者:格蕾特·梅塞尔-赫斯:《新女性与性危机》作者:海尔格·索尔森,斯科特·斯佩克特,《格蕾特·梅塞尔-赫斯:新女性与性危机》德国研究中的妇女与性别罗切斯特,纽约州:卡姆登之家,2022年。就其贡献的范围和原创性而言,格蕾特·梅塞尔-赫斯是“终结主义”女性主义的关键人物,尽管她几乎没有得到这样的认可。赫尔加·索尔森的新书《格蕾特·梅塞尔-赫斯:新女性与性危机》清楚地表明,梅塞尔-赫斯在她自己的一生中是多么广为人知,以及她在20世纪头20年里是多么处于思想转变的核心。从这个意义上说,一本专门介绍她的生活和工作的英文专著是非常合适的。这本书主要不是一本传记,而是在她那个时代的运动、辩论和矛盾的大背景下,对梅塞尔-赫斯的各种文化作品(文学、科学和辩论)的叙述。这本书的一大优势在于,它将这些文化背景与梅塞尔-赫斯的女权主义和社会学思想、她的文学作品以及她的生活编织在一起,令人信服。在此过程中,索尔森提出了几个强有力的、环环相扣的论点。麦瑟尔-赫斯的思想倾向于当时兴起的一元论,即把看似不相干的事物统一起来,拒绝本质上的二元对立,如理想和物质;这是一个潜在的激进的性别关系重新配置的基础。和同时代的许多人一样,她感到人类正处于一场生活方式的巨大转变的边缘,以适应(或赶上)上个世纪最后三分之一时期出现的新理解模式。现代主义(die Moderne是一个包含这个词和“现代性”的术语)承诺实现这种潜力;与此同时,社会秩序被打破的方式被视为现代性快速变化的结果。迈瑟尔-赫斯对重大转变的承诺是对现代前景的投资。在Thorson的阅读中,Meisel-Hess的现代主义,她的女权主义和她的犹太人身份是一体的。与梅塞尔-赫斯自己的一元论偏好一样,索尔森认为作者和作品之间的界限被打破了,这样,作者自己的生活就与她的文化贡献融合在一起了。在索尔森的书中,那个时期经常被讨论的“新女性”既是一个话语人物,也是变革的推动者。根据索尔森的说法,梅塞尔-赫斯代表并批判性地评价了这个形象,尽管她把自己塑造成一个“热情的”有能动性的新女性。在一个同样具有挑衅性的举动中,Thorson认为Meisel-Hess最著名的书名中的“性危机”不仅仅是她分析和批判的对象,它成为了她陷入困境并导致她自己死亡的条件。在简要介绍了主题和作者的意图之后,索尔森开始用两章来关注梅塞尔-赫斯在文学和论战作品中与新女性形象的接触。这些对“新女性”的提及似乎是一个单一而清晰的东西——一个具有特定外观和意义的非常特殊的人物——似乎有些过于具体化,因为这个术语实际上指的是许多相互矛盾的形象、类型和幻想。梅塞尔-赫斯本人心中就有这样一个形象,并在她的生活中有意识地追求它,这一论点是有说服力的。随着迈泽尔-赫斯搬到柏林,索尔森随后专注于《性之克莱斯》(1909)和其他作品。在这里,她在消除一些读者的怀疑方面取得了一些进展,这些读者可能会怀疑这本书在某些地方接近圣徒传记。大多数了解梅塞尔-赫斯主要作品的人都不会只想到这位女权主义者对拉森卫生学的明显依赖。虽然这种联系在早期被提到,但在当代读者看来……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Austrian Studies
Journal of Austrian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信