{"title":"Eberhard Kranzmayer's Deutschtum: On the Austrian Dialectologist's Pan-German Frame of Reference","authors":"Stefan Dollinger","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The present paper offers a close reading of Eberhard Kranzmayer's texts from 1925 to 1960 in an effort to isolate Kranzmayer's major methodological themes. One such theme is a pan-German (großdeutsch) framework, in which the unity of German with a single standard variety is maintained. It will be shown how Kranzmayer used this assumption, combined with his belief in the cultural dominance of all things German, to perform \"linguistic land claims\" for Germany before and during the war. While his post-war texts are identical in argument, with some democratic window-trimmings, any land claims are more muted and cultural similarity is now stressed. Kranzmayer's time as director of the Institut für Kärntner Landesforschung, 1942–45, will be reviewed in regard to his claim that a people is determined by a standard variety: a status that he granted the Friuli, but not the Slovenes (the Windisch) and, certainly and always, the Germans. It will be argued that such pan-German mindset necessarily influenced conceptions of a budding Standard Austrian German and that, today still, Germanistik is largely bound by the idea of a One Standard German Axiom, in striking similarity to the 1920s.","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: The present paper offers a close reading of Eberhard Kranzmayer's texts from 1925 to 1960 in an effort to isolate Kranzmayer's major methodological themes. One such theme is a pan-German (großdeutsch) framework, in which the unity of German with a single standard variety is maintained. It will be shown how Kranzmayer used this assumption, combined with his belief in the cultural dominance of all things German, to perform "linguistic land claims" for Germany before and during the war. While his post-war texts are identical in argument, with some democratic window-trimmings, any land claims are more muted and cultural similarity is now stressed. Kranzmayer's time as director of the Institut für Kärntner Landesforschung, 1942–45, will be reviewed in regard to his claim that a people is determined by a standard variety: a status that he granted the Friuli, but not the Slovenes (the Windisch) and, certainly and always, the Germans. It will be argued that such pan-German mindset necessarily influenced conceptions of a budding Standard Austrian German and that, today still, Germanistik is largely bound by the idea of a One Standard German Axiom, in striking similarity to the 1920s.
摘要:本文对埃伯哈德·克兰兹迈耶1925年至1960年的文本进行了仔细阅读,以分离克兰兹迈耶的主要方法论主题。其中一个主题是泛德语(großdeutsch)框架,在这个框架中,德语以单一的标准变体保持统一。本文将展示克兰兹梅尔是如何利用这一假设,结合他对一切德国文化优势的信念,在战前和战争期间为德国提出“语言领土要求”的。虽然他的战后文本在论点上是相同的,只是做了一些民主的修饰,但任何土地要求都更加低调,文化相似性现在也得到了强调。Kranzmayer在1942年至1945年担任研究所所长期间( r Kärntner Landesforschung),我们将对他关于一个民族是由一个标准品种决定的主张进行回顾:他给予了弗留利人,而不是斯洛文尼亚人(Windisch),当然也永远是德国人。有人会说,这种泛德意志的思维方式必然影响了标准奥地利德语的萌芽,而且,今天,德意志主义在很大程度上仍然受到一个标准德国公理的观念的束缚,这与20世纪20年代惊人地相似。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.