{"title":"H. C. Artmann & Berlin ed. by Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: H. C. Artmann & Berlin ed. by Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster Paul Buchholz Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster, eds., H. C. Artmann & Berlin. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2021. 294 pp. Academic literary-critical discourse on H. C. Artmann has tended to be sporadic and eclectic, and one reason for this is that his writings rarely if ever lend themselves to hermeneutic readings. Artmann's works are ludic, as the author himself pointed out, in a way that stringently adheres to Johan Huizinga's idea of play as a free act with no social function and no meaning outside itself. For this reason, the most fruitful scholarly work on H. C. Artmann is not based in hermeneutic close readings but rather seeks to capture the social and cultural world in which he wrote, performed, collaborated, and socialized. Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster's edited [End Page 119] volume H. C. Artmann & Berlin is, in this regard, an essential scholarly publication, valuable both to literary historians of the postwar era and to general Artmann enthusiasts. The book collects the proceedings of a 2019 conference of the same name, held in the Wien-Bibliothek in the Vienna Rathaus. Its title is, at any rate, a bit reductive: while the book indeed gives diverse accounts of the author's stays in Berlin in 1962, 1965–66, and 1967–68, it also delves into an array of other fascinating topics. Indeed, this book seems somewhat like a prelude to the Artmann biography being published in 2023, co-written by Schuster with Veronika Premer. H. C. Artmann und Berlin shows how the author's enthusiastic and sociable relationship to Berlin yielded some of the most iconic works of his career, including his story \"dracula dracula\" and its iterations across media (performative happening, printed text, and woodcut print). While in Berlin, Artmann became a social node for younger Austrian writers for whom he was an iconoclastic role model and interlocutor, such as Peter Chotjewitz and Wolfgang Bauer. Finally, the book provides a clearer sense of how Artmann—who scrupulously avoided political commentary in his works, taking a very different postwar path than the Gruppe 47—in his own way was deeply embedded in the political-cultural landscape of the 1960s: his dislike of the militant leftist language that flooded the cultural scene of West Berlin in the later sixties, his (apocryphal) claim to having been present at the 1967 West Berlin student demonstration against the Shah of Iran, his cordial encounters with RAF terrorist Gudrun Ensslin, and time spent socializing with Peter Weiss. These stories, presented in biographical, historical, and analytic chapters as well as interviews, are by no means only raw anecdotes; they have the cumulative purpose of showing how Artmann's highly eccentric path was taken deliberately and in lively dialogue with his literary contemporaries. The book is divided into four sections, each of which is in itself eclectic in terms of genre. Marc-Oliver Schuster opens the first, \"Überblick und Annäherungen,\" with a biographical overview detailing Artmann's times in (West) Berlin—that is to say, he never lived there for any very extended period of time, but he made frequent extensive visits to the city, which prior to the upheavals in 1968 had a special status for the author as a city of creative possibility and cultural liberality. Marc-Oliver Schuster provides an extensive overview of Artmann's nearly lifelong relationship to the city of Berlin, and [End Page 120] Peter Pabisch presents the history of the institution that was an important node of Artmann's literary presence in the city, the Literary Colloquium of Berlin (LCB). Hermann Schlösser's research on the reception of Artmann in the feuilletons of the BRD in the 1960s is particularly helpful in understanding how Artmann was seen (and even exoticized) within the literary culture of West Germany. Other highlights of this section include a 2019 interview with Gerhard Rühm as well as a somewhat meandering yet ultimately illuminating conversation between Friederike Mayröcker, Rosa Pock, Uwe Bremer, and Oswald Wiener. The second section of the book, \"Spezielle Zugänge,\" focuses on Artmann's relationships and parallels to...","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: H. C. Artmann & Berlin ed. by Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster Paul Buchholz Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster, eds., H. C. Artmann & Berlin. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2021. 294 pp. Academic literary-critical discourse on H. C. Artmann has tended to be sporadic and eclectic, and one reason for this is that his writings rarely if ever lend themselves to hermeneutic readings. Artmann's works are ludic, as the author himself pointed out, in a way that stringently adheres to Johan Huizinga's idea of play as a free act with no social function and no meaning outside itself. For this reason, the most fruitful scholarly work on H. C. Artmann is not based in hermeneutic close readings but rather seeks to capture the social and cultural world in which he wrote, performed, collaborated, and socialized. Sonja Kaar and Marc-Oliver Schuster's edited [End Page 119] volume H. C. Artmann & Berlin is, in this regard, an essential scholarly publication, valuable both to literary historians of the postwar era and to general Artmann enthusiasts. The book collects the proceedings of a 2019 conference of the same name, held in the Wien-Bibliothek in the Vienna Rathaus. Its title is, at any rate, a bit reductive: while the book indeed gives diverse accounts of the author's stays in Berlin in 1962, 1965–66, and 1967–68, it also delves into an array of other fascinating topics. Indeed, this book seems somewhat like a prelude to the Artmann biography being published in 2023, co-written by Schuster with Veronika Premer. H. C. Artmann und Berlin shows how the author's enthusiastic and sociable relationship to Berlin yielded some of the most iconic works of his career, including his story "dracula dracula" and its iterations across media (performative happening, printed text, and woodcut print). While in Berlin, Artmann became a social node for younger Austrian writers for whom he was an iconoclastic role model and interlocutor, such as Peter Chotjewitz and Wolfgang Bauer. Finally, the book provides a clearer sense of how Artmann—who scrupulously avoided political commentary in his works, taking a very different postwar path than the Gruppe 47—in his own way was deeply embedded in the political-cultural landscape of the 1960s: his dislike of the militant leftist language that flooded the cultural scene of West Berlin in the later sixties, his (apocryphal) claim to having been present at the 1967 West Berlin student demonstration against the Shah of Iran, his cordial encounters with RAF terrorist Gudrun Ensslin, and time spent socializing with Peter Weiss. These stories, presented in biographical, historical, and analytic chapters as well as interviews, are by no means only raw anecdotes; they have the cumulative purpose of showing how Artmann's highly eccentric path was taken deliberately and in lively dialogue with his literary contemporaries. The book is divided into four sections, each of which is in itself eclectic in terms of genre. Marc-Oliver Schuster opens the first, "Überblick und Annäherungen," with a biographical overview detailing Artmann's times in (West) Berlin—that is to say, he never lived there for any very extended period of time, but he made frequent extensive visits to the city, which prior to the upheavals in 1968 had a special status for the author as a city of creative possibility and cultural liberality. Marc-Oliver Schuster provides an extensive overview of Artmann's nearly lifelong relationship to the city of Berlin, and [End Page 120] Peter Pabisch presents the history of the institution that was an important node of Artmann's literary presence in the city, the Literary Colloquium of Berlin (LCB). Hermann Schlösser's research on the reception of Artmann in the feuilletons of the BRD in the 1960s is particularly helpful in understanding how Artmann was seen (and even exoticized) within the literary culture of West Germany. Other highlights of this section include a 2019 interview with Gerhard Rühm as well as a somewhat meandering yet ultimately illuminating conversation between Friederike Mayröcker, Rosa Pock, Uwe Bremer, and Oswald Wiener. The second section of the book, "Spezielle Zugänge," focuses on Artmann's relationships and parallels to...
评审:H. C. Artmann & Berlin主编,Sonja Kaar和Marc-Oliver Schuster。, H. C. Artmann & Berlin。w rzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2021。学术文学批评对h.c.阿尔特曼的论述往往是零星的和折衷的,其中一个原因是他的作品很少(如果有的话)适合解释学的阅读。正如作者自己指出的那样,Artmann的作品是滑稽的,在某种程度上严格遵循Johan Huizinga的观点,即游戏是一种自由的行为,没有社会功能,也没有外在的意义。出于这个原因,关于h.c. Artmann最有成果的学术工作不是基于解释学的仔细阅读,而是试图捕捉他写作、表演、合作和社交的社会和文化世界。在这方面,索尼娅·卡尔和马克·奥利弗·舒斯特编辑的《h·c·阿尔特曼与柏林》是一本重要的学术出版物,对战后时期的文学史学家和一般的阿尔特曼爱好者都很有价值。这本书收集了2019年在维也纳市政厅的维也纳图书馆举行的同名会议的记录。不管怎么说,这本书的标题还是有点精简:虽然这本书确实对作者在1962年、1965年至1966年和1967年至1968年在柏林的生活进行了不同的描述,但它也深入探讨了一系列其他有趣的话题。事实上,这本书似乎有点像2023年出版的阿尔特曼传记的前奏,由舒斯特尔与维罗妮卡·普雷梅尔共同撰写。H. C. Artmann und Berlin展示了作者与柏林的热情和社交关系如何产生了他职业生涯中一些最具代表性的作品,包括他的故事“德古拉·德古拉”及其在媒体上的迭代(表演发生,印刷文本和木刻版画)。在柏林期间,阿尔特曼成为年轻奥地利作家的社交节点,对他们来说,他是一个打破传统的榜样和对话者,比如彼得·乔杰维茨和沃尔夫冈·鲍尔。最后,这本书提供了一个更清晰的感觉,即阿尔特曼是如何以自己的方式深深植根于20世纪60年代的政治文化景观的。阿尔特曼在他的作品中小心翼翼地避免了政治评论,走了一条与47集团截然不同的战后道路。他不喜欢60年代后期充斥西柏林文化圈的激进左派语言,他声称自己参加了1967年西柏林学生反对伊朗国王的示威活动(这是杜传的),他与英国皇家空军恐怖分子古德伦·恩斯林的亲切接触,以及他与彼得·韦斯的交往。这些故事,以传记、历史和分析章节以及访谈的形式呈现,绝不仅仅是原始的轶事;它们的累积目的是展示阿尔特曼的高度古怪的道路是如何故意采取的,并与他的文学同时代人进行了生动的对话。这本书分为四个部分,每个部分本身就流派而言都是折衷的。马克·奥利弗·舒斯特(Marc-Oliver Schuster)在第一本《Überblick und Annäherungen》(Überblick und Annäherungen)的开头,详细介绍了阿尔特曼在(西)柏林的生活——也就是说,他从未在那里住过很长一段时间,但他经常广泛访问这座城市,在1968年的动荡之前,这座城市对作者来说有着特殊的地位,它是一座充满创意可能性和文化自由的城市。马克-奥利弗·舒斯特(Marc-Oliver Schuster)对阿尔特曼与柏林市近一生的关系进行了全面的概述,彼得·帕比什(Peter Pabisch)介绍了作为阿尔特曼在柏林文学存在的重要节点的柏林文学讨论会(LCB)机构的历史。赫尔曼Schlösser对20世纪60年代复兴开发银行(BRD)的小村庄对阿尔特曼的接受情况的研究,对于理解阿尔特曼在西德文学文化中是如何被看待(甚至被异国情调化)的,特别有帮助。本部分的其他亮点包括2019年对格哈德·雷姆的采访,以及Friederike Mayröcker、Rosa Pock、Uwe Bremer和Oswald Wiener之间的一段曲折但最终具有启发性的对话。本书的第二部分,“Spezielle Zugänge”,聚焦于阿尔特曼与……的关系和相似之处。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.