An unstable equilibrium: the Italian immigrants' inclusion model facing the pandemic crisis test

Q4 Social Sciences
Camilla Borgna, Violetta Tucci
{"title":"An unstable equilibrium: the Italian immigrants' inclusion model facing the pandemic crisis test","authors":"Camilla Borgna, Violetta Tucci","doi":"10.3280/sl2023-166007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Italian immigrants' inclusion model has been described as a \"low unemployment, bad jobs\" equilibrium: immigrants have relatively high employment rates but tend to be segregated in low-quality jobs. However, as these jobs are also unstable, so is the equilibrium: during periods of recession, immigrants may face higher risks of labor-market exclusion. This paper investigates immigrant penalties in terms of employment probabilities, job loss, labor-market (re)entry, and job quality throughout the first year of COVID-19 crisis, by analyzing data from the 2019 and 2020 ISTAT Labor Force Survey. We find that the pandemic crisis accelerated an already ongoing erosion of immigrants' relative employment advantage, while at the same time increasing their segregation in low-quality jobs. The deterioration of immigrants' employment chances is chiefly driven by increased barriers in (re)entering the labor market which, especially for women, might be due to self-selection into inactivity. These findings suggest that the structural factors that have historically facilitated the activation of immigrant workers might have become factors of instability.","PeriodicalId":35760,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia del Lavoro","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia del Lavoro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/sl2023-166007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Italian immigrants' inclusion model has been described as a "low unemployment, bad jobs" equilibrium: immigrants have relatively high employment rates but tend to be segregated in low-quality jobs. However, as these jobs are also unstable, so is the equilibrium: during periods of recession, immigrants may face higher risks of labor-market exclusion. This paper investigates immigrant penalties in terms of employment probabilities, job loss, labor-market (re)entry, and job quality throughout the first year of COVID-19 crisis, by analyzing data from the 2019 and 2020 ISTAT Labor Force Survey. We find that the pandemic crisis accelerated an already ongoing erosion of immigrants' relative employment advantage, while at the same time increasing their segregation in low-quality jobs. The deterioration of immigrants' employment chances is chiefly driven by increased barriers in (re)entering the labor market which, especially for women, might be due to self-selection into inactivity. These findings suggest that the structural factors that have historically facilitated the activation of immigrant workers might have become factors of instability.
不稳定的均衡:大流行危机考验下的意大利移民包容模式
意大利移民的包容模式被描述为“低失业率,糟糕工作”的均衡:移民的就业率相对较高,但往往被隔离在低质量的工作岗位上。然而,由于这些工作也是不稳定的,平衡也是不稳定的:在经济衰退期间,移民可能面临被劳动力市场排斥的更高风险。本文通过分析2019年和2020年ISTAT劳动力调查的数据,从就业概率、失业、劳动力市场(再)进入和工作质量等方面考察了新冠肺炎危机第一年的移民惩罚。我们发现,这场大流行病危机加速了对移民相对就业优势的持续侵蚀,同时加剧了他们在低质量工作岗位上的隔离。移民就业机会的恶化主要是由于(重新)进入劳动力市场的障碍增加,特别是对妇女来说,这可能是由于自我选择不活动。这些发现表明,历史上促进移民工人激活的结构性因素可能已经成为不稳定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociologia del Lavoro
Sociologia del Lavoro Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信