Engaging the Tafsīr Tradition: A Springboard into a Bottomless Ocean

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Hadia Mubarak
{"title":"Engaging the Tafsīr Tradition: A Springboard into a Bottomless Ocean","authors":"Hadia Mubarak","doi":"10.2979/jfs.2023.a908297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging the Tafsīr TraditionA Springboard into a Bottomless Ocean Hadia Mubarak (bio) Does the Qurʾan chart a new discourse on women and gender—one that upends and subverts patriarchal norms or gender oppression—or does it, on the other hand, entrench patriarchal norms and hierarchies? This has been a persistent question in the scholarship on gender in the Qurʾan, and the answers generated by the past two decades of scholarship are far from conclusive. There have generally been three approaches to this question. One approach is a scripturalist one, which distinguishes between the Qurʾan's portrayal and treatment of women and the exegetical portrayal of women. A few significant works that took this approach are Women, Muslim Society and Islam (1988), by Lamya Faruqi (d. 1986), Women in the Qurʾan, Traditions, and Interpretations (1996), by Barbara Stowasser (d. 2012), and Women and Gender in the Qur'an (2020), by Celene Ibrahim. Stowasser's book was the first significant English-language academic work to be devoted to the subject. Departing from the approach of many scholars to skirt the exegetical tradition in their engagement with the Qurʾan, Stowasser took a deep plunge into this tradition, finding that qurʾanic exegesis and the Qurʾan itself are not always consistent in their portrayal of women. Ibrahim's work, which explores all the major and minor female figures referenced in the Qurʾan, pushes the boundaries of qurʾanic studies through her engagement with the Qurʾan through the lens of \"Muslima theology.\"1 A second approach to this persistent question is to separate the Qurʾan from its exegesis with the specific aim of recovering what authors believe is the [End Page 63] Qurʾan's \"anti-patriarchal epistemology\" or its egalitarian trajectory.2 This second approach resembles the first; however, it diverges in its a priori conclusion that the Qurʾan is an egalitarian text and in its aim to make a case for the Qurʾan's egalitarian episteme. Scholars who have contributed significant works to a rereading of qurʾanic scripture from a gendered lens are Asma Barlas, amina wadud, Azizah al-Hibri, Riffat Hassan, Abla Hasan, and Asma Lamrabet, among others. The third approach has been a critical reading, one that challenges the subjectivity, \"text fundamentalism,\"3 and \"methodological rigidity\"4 of feminist approaches to the Qurʾan. Primarily concerned with philosophical and methodological arguments, scholars working on gender in the Qurʾan who have taken this approach include Kecia Ali, Aysha Hidayatullah, and Ebrahim Moosa. They critique feminist scholars or exegetes for imposing their own contemporary sensibilities upon the Qurʾan, even when the literal meanings of the text appear to contradict their egalitarian aspirations for it. As a way out of the deadlock between the second and third approaches described here, I argue for a fourth approach that more robustly engages with the long history of qurʾanic interpretation. Despite the flourishing of literature on women in the Qurʾan, much of the conversation on the Qurʾan's gender ethics or gender justice is occurring outside the genre of qurʾanic commentaries (tafsīr). A few exceptions to this are Karen Bauer's Gender Hierarchy in the Qurʾan (2015), Ayesha Chaudhry's Domestic Violence and the Islamic Tradition (2013), Johanna Pink's Muslim Qurʾānic Interpretation Today (2018), Nevin Reda and Yasmin Amin's edited volume Islamic Interpretive Tradition and Gender Justice (2020), and my own Rebellious Wives, Neglectful Husbands (2022). What does a constructive engagement with tafsīr studies offer the field of women and gender in the Qurʾan? The pluralism of the exegetical tradition offers a gateway for new interpretations, ones that do not presume patriarchy as an inherent feature of the qurʾanic text. A closer analysis of this discipline also enriches contemporary efforts to recover Islam's broader ethics, including gender egalitarianism. Moreover, a serious engagement with tafsīr can recover subtle semantic insights and can provide a clearer understanding of intratextual mechanics and intertextual resonances. A substantive engagement with the Qurʾan's interpretive tradition, tafsīr points to the textual polysemy of Islam's long-standing interpretive tradition. The pluralism...","PeriodicalId":44347,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging the Tafsīr TraditionA Springboard into a Bottomless Ocean Hadia Mubarak (bio) Does the Qurʾan chart a new discourse on women and gender—one that upends and subverts patriarchal norms or gender oppression—or does it, on the other hand, entrench patriarchal norms and hierarchies? This has been a persistent question in the scholarship on gender in the Qurʾan, and the answers generated by the past two decades of scholarship are far from conclusive. There have generally been three approaches to this question. One approach is a scripturalist one, which distinguishes between the Qurʾan's portrayal and treatment of women and the exegetical portrayal of women. A few significant works that took this approach are Women, Muslim Society and Islam (1988), by Lamya Faruqi (d. 1986), Women in the Qurʾan, Traditions, and Interpretations (1996), by Barbara Stowasser (d. 2012), and Women and Gender in the Qur'an (2020), by Celene Ibrahim. Stowasser's book was the first significant English-language academic work to be devoted to the subject. Departing from the approach of many scholars to skirt the exegetical tradition in their engagement with the Qurʾan, Stowasser took a deep plunge into this tradition, finding that qurʾanic exegesis and the Qurʾan itself are not always consistent in their portrayal of women. Ibrahim's work, which explores all the major and minor female figures referenced in the Qurʾan, pushes the boundaries of qurʾanic studies through her engagement with the Qurʾan through the lens of "Muslima theology."1 A second approach to this persistent question is to separate the Qurʾan from its exegesis with the specific aim of recovering what authors believe is the [End Page 63] Qurʾan's "anti-patriarchal epistemology" or its egalitarian trajectory.2 This second approach resembles the first; however, it diverges in its a priori conclusion that the Qurʾan is an egalitarian text and in its aim to make a case for the Qurʾan's egalitarian episteme. Scholars who have contributed significant works to a rereading of qurʾanic scripture from a gendered lens are Asma Barlas, amina wadud, Azizah al-Hibri, Riffat Hassan, Abla Hasan, and Asma Lamrabet, among others. The third approach has been a critical reading, one that challenges the subjectivity, "text fundamentalism,"3 and "methodological rigidity"4 of feminist approaches to the Qurʾan. Primarily concerned with philosophical and methodological arguments, scholars working on gender in the Qurʾan who have taken this approach include Kecia Ali, Aysha Hidayatullah, and Ebrahim Moosa. They critique feminist scholars or exegetes for imposing their own contemporary sensibilities upon the Qurʾan, even when the literal meanings of the text appear to contradict their egalitarian aspirations for it. As a way out of the deadlock between the second and third approaches described here, I argue for a fourth approach that more robustly engages with the long history of qurʾanic interpretation. Despite the flourishing of literature on women in the Qurʾan, much of the conversation on the Qurʾan's gender ethics or gender justice is occurring outside the genre of qurʾanic commentaries (tafsīr). A few exceptions to this are Karen Bauer's Gender Hierarchy in the Qurʾan (2015), Ayesha Chaudhry's Domestic Violence and the Islamic Tradition (2013), Johanna Pink's Muslim Qurʾānic Interpretation Today (2018), Nevin Reda and Yasmin Amin's edited volume Islamic Interpretive Tradition and Gender Justice (2020), and my own Rebellious Wives, Neglectful Husbands (2022). What does a constructive engagement with tafsīr studies offer the field of women and gender in the Qurʾan? The pluralism of the exegetical tradition offers a gateway for new interpretations, ones that do not presume patriarchy as an inherent feature of the qurʾanic text. A closer analysis of this discipline also enriches contemporary efforts to recover Islam's broader ethics, including gender egalitarianism. Moreover, a serious engagement with tafsīr can recover subtle semantic insights and can provide a clearer understanding of intratextual mechanics and intertextual resonances. A substantive engagement with the Qurʾan's interpretive tradition, tafsīr points to the textual polysemy of Islam's long-standing interpretive tradition. The pluralism...
参与塔夫斯基传统:进入无底洞海洋的跳板
《古兰经》是否描绘了一种关于女性和性别的新话语——一种颠覆和颠覆父权规范或性别压迫的话语——或者,另一方面,它是否巩固了父权规范和等级制度?这是关于《古兰经》性别的学术研究中一直存在的一个问题,过去二十年的学术研究得出的答案远没有定论。通常有三种方法来解决这个问题。一种方法是经文学家的方法,它区分了古兰经对女性的描绘和处理,以及对女性的训诂。采用这种方法的一些重要作品是Lamya Faruqi(1986年)的《妇女、穆斯林社会和伊斯兰教》(1988年),Barbara Stowasser(2012年)的《古兰经中的妇女、传统和解释》(1996年)和Celene Ibrahim的《古兰经中的妇女和性别》(2020年)。斯托瓦瑟的书是第一本致力于这一主题的重要英语学术著作。与许多学者在研究《古兰经》时避开训诂传统的做法不同,斯托瓦瑟深入研究了这一传统,发现《古兰经》训诂和《古兰经》本身对女性的描绘并不总是一致的。易卜拉欣的作品探讨了古兰经中提到的所有主要和次要的女性形象,通过她通过“穆斯林神学”的镜头与古兰经的接触,推动了古兰经研究的界限。解决这个持久问题的第二种方法是将《古兰经》与其训诂学分开,其具体目的是恢复作者所认为的《古兰经》的“反父权认识论”或其平等主义轨迹第二种方法类似于第一种;然而,它的分歧在于其先验结论,即《古兰经》是一部平等主义的文本,其目的是为《古兰经》的平等主义知识提出一个案例。从性别视角重新解读古兰经经文的学者有阿斯玛·巴拉斯、阿米娜·瓦杜德、阿齐扎·阿尔·希布里、里法特·哈桑、亚伯拉·哈桑和阿斯玛·兰拉贝特等。第三种方法是批判性阅读,它挑战了女性主义对《古兰经》的主观性、“文本原教旨主义”和“方法论僵化”。主要关注哲学和方法论的争论,采用这种方法研究古兰经性别的学者包括Kecia Ali, Aysha Hidayatullah和Ebrahim Moosa。他们批评女权主义学者或注释家将他们自己的当代情感强加于《古兰经》之上,即使经文的字面意义似乎与他们对它的平等主义愿望相矛盾。为了摆脱这里描述的第二种和第三种方法之间的僵局,我主张第四种方法,它更有力地与古兰经解释的悠久历史联系在一起。尽管《古兰经》中关于女性的文献大量出现,但关于《古兰经》性别伦理或性别正义的讨论大多发生在《古兰经》注释体裁之外(tafs ā r)。少数例外是卡伦·Bauer的《古兰经中的性别等级》(2015年)、Ayesha Chaudhry的《家庭暴力与伊斯兰传统》(2013年)、约翰娜·平克的《穆斯林古兰经ānic今日解读》(2018年)、Nevin Reda和Yasmin Amin编辑的《伊斯兰解读传统与性别正义》(2020年),以及我自己的《叛逆的妻子,忽视的丈夫》(2022年)。对《古兰经》中妇女和性别的研究进行建设性的参与,会给这个领域带来什么?训诂传统的多元性为新的解释提供了一个门户,这些解释不假定父权制是古兰经文本的固有特征。对这一学科的深入分析也丰富了当代恢复伊斯兰教更广泛伦理的努力,包括性别平等主义。此外,认真研究tafsr可以恢复微妙的语义洞察力,并可以更清楚地理解文内机制和互文共鸣。与古兰经的解释传统的实质性接触,塔夫斯基指出了伊斯兰教长期存在的解释传统的文本多义性。多元化……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, the oldest interdisciplinary, inter-religious feminist academic journal in religious studies, is a channel for the publication of feminist scholarship in religion and a forum for discussion and dialogue among women and men of differing feminist perspectives. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信