Effects of Six-Week Pre-Season Complex Contrast Training Intervention on Male Soccer Players’ Athletic Performance

Q3 Health Professions
Gopal Kumar, Vivek Pandey, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Rohit K. Thapa
{"title":"Effects of Six-Week Pre-Season Complex Contrast Training Intervention on Male Soccer Players’ Athletic Performance","authors":"Gopal Kumar, Vivek Pandey, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Rohit K. Thapa","doi":"10.2478/pjst-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a six-week complex contrast training (CCT) intervention on the athletic performance of highly-trained amateur male soccer players during the pre-season period. Material and Methods. Participants aged 21.3 were randomized to CCT (n = 7) or active (i.e. standard soccer training) control (CG; n = 9) groups. Athletic performance was assessed using the 30 m linear sprint test time, standing long jump distance (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and unilateral right-left knee flexion and extension isokinetic maximal strength tests. The experimental group replaced part of the standard soccer training schedule with three CCT sessions per week for six weeks. A two (pre-post intervention) by two (CCT, CG) mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the exercise-specific effects. In addition, between-group comparisons at post-test were conducted with baseline scores as covariate. Within group changes were analyzed using paired t-test. Results. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for all dependent variables (p < 0.001 – 0.004). Post-hoc tests using paired t-test revealed significant improvements in all dependent variables in CCT (all p ≤ 0.001; effect size (g) = 0.29 – 0.96; %Δ = 4.5 – 14.7), but not in CG (p = 0.174 – 0.633; g = 0.03 – 0.20; %Δ = 0.4 – 2.6). Further, Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc analysis using baseline scores as a covariate showed post-test differences in favor of CCT compared to CG for all variables. Conclusions. CCT is recommended as an effective training strategy during the pre-season to improve athletic performance among highly-trained amateur male soccer players.","PeriodicalId":37359,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a six-week complex contrast training (CCT) intervention on the athletic performance of highly-trained amateur male soccer players during the pre-season period. Material and Methods. Participants aged 21.3 were randomized to CCT (n = 7) or active (i.e. standard soccer training) control (CG; n = 9) groups. Athletic performance was assessed using the 30 m linear sprint test time, standing long jump distance (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and unilateral right-left knee flexion and extension isokinetic maximal strength tests. The experimental group replaced part of the standard soccer training schedule with three CCT sessions per week for six weeks. A two (pre-post intervention) by two (CCT, CG) mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the exercise-specific effects. In addition, between-group comparisons at post-test were conducted with baseline scores as covariate. Within group changes were analyzed using paired t-test. Results. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for all dependent variables (p < 0.001 – 0.004). Post-hoc tests using paired t-test revealed significant improvements in all dependent variables in CCT (all p ≤ 0.001; effect size (g) = 0.29 – 0.96; %Δ = 4.5 – 14.7), but not in CG (p = 0.174 – 0.633; g = 0.03 – 0.20; %Δ = 0.4 – 2.6). Further, Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc analysis using baseline scores as a covariate showed post-test differences in favor of CCT compared to CG for all variables. Conclusions. CCT is recommended as an effective training strategy during the pre-season to improve athletic performance among highly-trained amateur male soccer players.
六周季前复杂对比训练干预对男子足球运动员运动成绩的影响
摘要介绍。本研究旨在探讨为期六周的复杂对比训练(CCT)干预对训练有素的业余男子足球运动员季前运动表现的影响。材料和方法。年龄21.3岁的参与者被随机分配到CCT (n = 7)或积极(即标准足球训练)对照组(CG;N = 9)组。采用30米直线冲刺测试时间、立定跳远距离(SLJ)、反动作跳跃(CMJ)高度和单侧左右膝关节屈伸等速最大力量测试对运动成绩进行评价。实验组将部分标准足球训练计划改为每周三次CCT,持续六周。采用双(干预前后)双(CCT, CG)混合方差分析分析运动特异性效果。此外,以基线分数作为协变量进行后测组间比较。组内变化采用配对t检验分析。结果。所有因变量均存在显著的群体-时间交互效应(p <0.001 - 0.004)。采用配对t检验的事后检验显示,CCT的所有因变量均有显著改善(均p≤0.001;效应量(g) = 0.29 - 0.96;%Δ = 4.5 - 14.7),但CG没有(p = 0.174 - 0.633;G = 0.03 ~ 0.20;%Δ = 0.4 - 2.6)。此外,Bonferroni调整了使用基线分数作为协变量的事后分析,结果显示,与CG相比,所有变量的后测试差异都有利于CCT。结论。CCT被推荐为赛季前有效的训练策略,以提高训练有素的业余男子足球运动员的运动表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism
Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信