Meritocracy in Singapore as an alternative modernisation project

А. Akylbay
{"title":"Meritocracy in Singapore as an alternative modernisation project","authors":"А. Akylbay","doi":"10.26577/jos.2023.v106.i3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the phenomenon of political meritocracy, the true embodiment of which can be attributed to the history of Singapore's political system formation and development. Analysis of various modernisation projects is still topical to thoroughly analyse them, and form conclusions that can be applied to the development of other states. The methodological basis of study is both historical and political science research methods. The first category includes descriptive and narrative, historical and genetic methods, the second category includes structural and functional, value and normative methods, and also a systematic approach. Today the research studies the state of Singapore, analyses political, economic, and attitudinal prerequisites for establishing meritocracy as a leading concept in the country, and presents the main value orientations shaping Singapore's political process. The article focuses on the analysis of similarities and differences between the main ideological benchmarks that are common to countries of the “collective West” as well as those in Asia, particularly in its South-East part. The case of Singapore is used as an example to analyse the emergence and spread of meritocracy in the practice of public administration in Asian countries. Besides, moral and ethical nuclear concepts which ensure the functioning of the public administration system in Singapore are revealed. The information presented in this article will be of interest to researchers in comparative political science and regional studies, and also to a wide range of readers whose interests are directly related to the topic considered in this study. Keywords: Meritocracy, Singapore, modernisation, South-East Asia, oriental studies, comparative political science. &nbsp","PeriodicalId":34594,"journal":{"name":"@lFarabi Atyndag''y K''azak'' U''lttyk'' Universiteti khabarshy shyg''ystanu seriiasy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"@lFarabi Atyndag''y K''azak'' U''lttyk'' Universiteti khabarshy shyg''ystanu seriiasy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26577/jos.2023.v106.i3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of political meritocracy, the true embodiment of which can be attributed to the history of Singapore's political system formation and development. Analysis of various modernisation projects is still topical to thoroughly analyse them, and form conclusions that can be applied to the development of other states. The methodological basis of study is both historical and political science research methods. The first category includes descriptive and narrative, historical and genetic methods, the second category includes structural and functional, value and normative methods, and also a systematic approach. Today the research studies the state of Singapore, analyses political, economic, and attitudinal prerequisites for establishing meritocracy as a leading concept in the country, and presents the main value orientations shaping Singapore's political process. The article focuses on the analysis of similarities and differences between the main ideological benchmarks that are common to countries of the “collective West” as well as those in Asia, particularly in its South-East part. The case of Singapore is used as an example to analyse the emergence and spread of meritocracy in the practice of public administration in Asian countries. Besides, moral and ethical nuclear concepts which ensure the functioning of the public administration system in Singapore are revealed. The information presented in this article will be of interest to researchers in comparative political science and regional studies, and also to a wide range of readers whose interests are directly related to the topic considered in this study. Keywords: Meritocracy, Singapore, modernisation, South-East Asia, oriental studies, comparative political science.  
新加坡的精英政治是另一个现代化项目
本文考察的是精英政治现象,这种现象的真正体现可以归结为新加坡政治制度形成和发展的历史。对各种现代化项目的分析仍然是热门话题,以彻底分析它们,并形成可以应用于其他国家发展的结论。研究的方法论基础是历史学和政治学的研究方法。第一类包括描述与叙事、历史与遗传方法;第二类包括结构与功能、价值与规范方法以及系统方法。今天,该研究研究了新加坡的现状,分析了在该国建立精英政治作为主导概念的政治、经济和态度先决条件,并提出了塑造新加坡政治进程的主要价值取向。本文着重分析了“集体西方”国家与亚洲(尤其是东南亚)国家共同的主要意识形态基准之间的异同。本文以新加坡为例,分析了亚洲国家公共行政实践中精英管理的出现和传播。此外,还揭示了确保新加坡公共行政系统运作的道德和伦理核心概念。本文中提供的信息将对比较政治学和区域研究的研究人员以及与本研究中所考虑的主题直接相关的广泛读者感兴趣。关键词:精英政治,新加坡,现代化,东南亚,东方研究,比较政治学。今天早上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信