Destined to Hope or Remorse: T.S. Eliot, Francis Bacon, and Their Furies

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 THEATER
MODERN DRAMA Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3138/md-66-3-1268
DÍdac Llorens-Cubedo
{"title":"Destined to Hope or Remorse: T.S. Eliot, Francis Bacon, and Their Furies","authors":"DÍdac Llorens-Cubedo","doi":"10.3138/md-66-3-1268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the relationship between the Furies as depicted in T.S. Eliot’s The Family Reunion (1939) and the work of painter Francis Bacon. Bacon’s Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion (1944) – a triptych depicting three grotesque amorphous creatures, which he identified with the Furies – was directly inspired by The Family Reunion , which in turn draws on Aeschylus’ The Eumenides . Eliot’s play not only generated a creative response by Bacon that inaugurated his characteristic style; crucially, it also led him to the Oresteia as a source of inspiration that would be pivotal for his later career. In the play, Eliot’s goddesses of retribution pursue Harry, who is said to have perpetuated a family curse by murdering his wife. The integration of the Furies into a modern play with a Christian background and their visual representation on stage are central challenges of The Family Reunion , as Eliot acknowledged. Bacon represented the Furies as monsters in Three Studies , a triptych that evokes Christian iconography linked to mythology. There are, however, essential differences between Eliot’s and Bacon’s approaches. In The Family Reunion , the Furies become salvific “bright angels” offering Harry an escape from his private hell, whereas in Bacon’s representations, they remain monsters or birds of ill omen that never bring hope. Eliot eventually came to consider his Furies a dramatic failure, recommending they be invisible on stage and subsequently adhering to realism in his drama; for Bacon, the Furies became recurrent images of horror and guilt, haunting but inspirational.","PeriodicalId":43301,"journal":{"name":"MODERN DRAMA","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/md-66-3-1268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article traces the relationship between the Furies as depicted in T.S. Eliot’s The Family Reunion (1939) and the work of painter Francis Bacon. Bacon’s Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion (1944) – a triptych depicting three grotesque amorphous creatures, which he identified with the Furies – was directly inspired by The Family Reunion , which in turn draws on Aeschylus’ The Eumenides . Eliot’s play not only generated a creative response by Bacon that inaugurated his characteristic style; crucially, it also led him to the Oresteia as a source of inspiration that would be pivotal for his later career. In the play, Eliot’s goddesses of retribution pursue Harry, who is said to have perpetuated a family curse by murdering his wife. The integration of the Furies into a modern play with a Christian background and their visual representation on stage are central challenges of The Family Reunion , as Eliot acknowledged. Bacon represented the Furies as monsters in Three Studies , a triptych that evokes Christian iconography linked to mythology. There are, however, essential differences between Eliot’s and Bacon’s approaches. In The Family Reunion , the Furies become salvific “bright angels” offering Harry an escape from his private hell, whereas in Bacon’s representations, they remain monsters or birds of ill omen that never bring hope. Eliot eventually came to consider his Furies a dramatic failure, recommending they be invisible on stage and subsequently adhering to realism in his drama; for Bacon, the Furies became recurrent images of horror and guilt, haunting but inspirational.
注定是希望还是悔恨:T.S.艾略特、弗朗西斯·培根和他们的愤怒
本文追溯了T.S.艾略特《家庭团聚》(1939)中描绘的复仇女神与画家弗朗西斯·培根作品之间的关系。培根的《十字架下的三个人物研究》(1944)是一幅三联画,描绘了三个奇形怪状的生物,他认为这是复仇女神。这幅画的灵感直接来自于《家庭团聚》,而《家庭团聚》又借鉴了埃斯库罗斯的《尤门尼德斯》。艾略特的剧本不仅引起了培根的创造性回应,开创了他独特的风格;最重要的是,这也让他找到了奥瑞斯泰亚,这对他后来的职业生涯至关重要。在剧中,艾略特笔下的复仇女神追逐着哈利,据说他谋杀了自己的妻子,从而延续了家族的诅咒。正如艾略特所承认的那样,将复仇女神融入基督教背景的现代戏剧以及他们在舞台上的视觉表现是《家庭团聚》的核心挑战。培根在《三个研究》中把复仇女神描绘成怪物,这幅三联画让人联想到与神话有关的基督教肖像。然而,艾略特和培根的方法有本质的不同。在《家庭团聚》中,复仇女神变成了拯救哈利的“光明天使”,让哈利逃离了他的私人地狱,而在培根的作品中,它们仍然是怪物或不祥的鸟,永远不会带来希望。艾略特最终认为他的复仇女神是戏剧的失败,建议他们在舞台上看不见,随后在他的戏剧中坚持现实主义;对培根来说,复仇女神成了反复出现的恐怖和内疚的形象,令人难以忘怀,但却鼓舞人心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MODERN DRAMA
MODERN DRAMA THEATER-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信