‘Constructing the test to the teaching’ – and the complexities of assessing learning in ethics education

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Karin Sporre, Christina Osbeck, Annika Lilja, David Lifmark, Olof Franck, Anna Lyngfelt
{"title":"‘Constructing the test to the teaching’ – and the complexities of assessing learning in ethics education","authors":"Karin Sporre, Christina Osbeck, Annika Lilja, David Lifmark, Olof Franck, Anna Lyngfelt","doi":"10.1080/13617672.2023.2271269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study draws on a research project where a model of fiction-based ethics education was developed and put into practice during a school year in five classes in compulsory school, two in grade 5 and three in grade 8. A test was constructed with the purpose of evaluating a multi-dimensional ethical competence. The test was given at the beginning and the end of the school year to the students in the five classes, but also to students in five other classes who received the ordinary form of ethics education. The test was constructed by using tasks from earlier Swedish national tests on ethics education, but in this study new assessment instructions were developed. According to this test, almost no significant differences were found between the classes with fiction-based ethics education and the other classes. However, this contrasts with the fruitfulness of the fiction-based model, as identified through other forms of evaluation. The findings raise questions about whether and how ethics education can be meaningfully tested, which in this article is self-critically reflected on. A concluding discussion on target competence, teaching intervention and ways of evaluation – in relation to each other – ends the article.","PeriodicalId":45928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Beliefs & Values-Studies in Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2023.2271269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study draws on a research project where a model of fiction-based ethics education was developed and put into practice during a school year in five classes in compulsory school, two in grade 5 and three in grade 8. A test was constructed with the purpose of evaluating a multi-dimensional ethical competence. The test was given at the beginning and the end of the school year to the students in the five classes, but also to students in five other classes who received the ordinary form of ethics education. The test was constructed by using tasks from earlier Swedish national tests on ethics education, but in this study new assessment instructions were developed. According to this test, almost no significant differences were found between the classes with fiction-based ethics education and the other classes. However, this contrasts with the fruitfulness of the fiction-based model, as identified through other forms of evaluation. The findings raise questions about whether and how ethics education can be meaningfully tested, which in this article is self-critically reflected on. A concluding discussion on target competence, teaching intervention and ways of evaluation – in relation to each other – ends the article.
“构建教学测试”——以及道德教育中评估学习的复杂性
本研究借鉴了一个研究项目,该项目开发了基于小说的道德教育模式,并在义务教育的五个班,五年级两个班和八年级三个班的一个学年中进行了实践。设计了一套多维道德能力评价量表。该测试在学年开始和结束时对这五个班的学生进行,也对其他五个接受普通形式道德教育的班级的学生进行。本测试采用早期瑞典国家道德教育测试的任务来构建,但在本研究中开发了新的评估说明。根据本测试,进行小说伦理教育的班级与其他班级之间几乎没有显著差异。然而,这与通过其他形式的评估确定的基于小说的模式的成果形成对比。研究结果提出了关于道德教育是否以及如何进行有意义的测试的问题,这在本文中是自我批判的反思。最后对目标能力、教学干预和评价方法三者之间的关系进行了结论性讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信