Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2023: Key Updates for Judicial Review Practi­­tioners

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Open Government Licence StatementContains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.Notes1 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (8th edn) para 1.1.3.2 R (DVP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 606 (Admin), [2021] 4 WLR 75 [8]. See also R (AB) v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and others [2019] EWHC 3461 (Admin), [2020] ACD 30 [108].3 Practice Direction 54A, para 1.1.4 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (7th edn) para 15.3.2.5 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 15.3.2.6 [2022] EWHC 2729 (Admin) [15]–[16].7 [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin).8 Cassandra Somers-Joce and Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin, ‘Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour’ [2023] JR (forthcoming).9 Simon Kiely and Jonathan Blunden, ‘Key Updates to the Administrative Court Guide’ (Sharpe Pritchard Blog, 7 September 2023) accessed 4 October 2023. See also Gabriel Tan, ‘Updates to the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide’ (Administrative Court Blog, 8 September 2023) accessed 4 October 2023; Somers-Joce and O’Loughlin (n 8).10 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) Preface.11 R (Marandi) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2023] EWHC 587 (Admin), [2023] 2 Cr App R 15 [16].12 [2011] EWCA Civ 42, [2011] 1 WLR 1645 [21].13 [2018] EWCA Crim 1341, [2018] 1 WLR 6023 [29(vi)–(vii)].14 [2023] EWHC 1579 (Admin) [48].15 [2022] EWHC 517 (Admin), [2022] ACD 52.16 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 23.2.6.17 [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin), [2022] A.C.D. 58 [21], [28].18 [2023] EWHC 980 (Admin), [2023] 4 WLR 45 [50].19 R (Safeer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2518 [16]–[19]; R (Singh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861 [16].20 ibid.21 A similarly neutral approach was taken by Hallett LJ in R (Talpada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 841 [2].22 [2022] EWCA Civ 355, [2022] 1 WLR 2339 [70].23 [2023] EWCA Civ 439, [2023] 4 WLR 37 [72].24 [2023] EWHC 50 (Admin) [26].25 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 10.1.5.26 [2022] EWHC 2890 (Admin) [13].27 [2002] EWCA Civ 879, [2002] CP Rep 6 [38].28 [2009] EWCA Civ 595.29 [2006] EWHC 816 (Comm), [2006] 5 Costs LR 714.30 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 24.1.2.31 [2020] EWCA Civ 146 [72].32 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 7.9.3, fn 103.33 [2022] EWHC 2515 (Admin), [2023] ACD 3 [74], [76].34 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (1st edn) Preface.35 See The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 2.2.