Can dialogue help police officers and young Black adults understand each other? Key findings from a restorative process

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ian D. Marder, Katharina Kurz
{"title":"Can dialogue help police officers and young Black adults understand each other? Key findings from a restorative process","authors":"Ian D. Marder, Katharina Kurz","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2023.2279067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRelationships between the police and minority ethnic communities are often characterised by tension, mistrust and a lack of understanding. It seems unlikely that the solutions lie in traditional approaches to police-community engagement. This article outlines the key findings from the first study to use restorative practices to facilitate dialogue between police officers and young Black adults in Europe. This occurred in a part of West Dublin, Ireland, where the police recently shot and killed a Black man. Observational and interview data suggest that the process enabled participants to speak and listen respectfully to each other and to understand how each other’s experiences shaped their perspectives on policing. These data suggest that restorative practices are a viable method for enabling dialogue that can play an educational role and provide a space safely to discuss and reflect upon views and experiences of belonging, policing and police-community relations. While there is sufficient evidence to justify seeking to scale-up dialogic processes, it remains unclear whether and how the contribution that dialogue can make at the individual and local level could translate into cultural change at the institutional level, or address underlying structural inequalities.KEYWORDS: Police-community relationsDialogueRestorative practicesAn Garda SíochánaPolicingInstitutional racism AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the substantial effort from all project partners and participants in making this happen.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by funding from the Irish Research Council (New Foundations).","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2279067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRelationships between the police and minority ethnic communities are often characterised by tension, mistrust and a lack of understanding. It seems unlikely that the solutions lie in traditional approaches to police-community engagement. This article outlines the key findings from the first study to use restorative practices to facilitate dialogue between police officers and young Black adults in Europe. This occurred in a part of West Dublin, Ireland, where the police recently shot and killed a Black man. Observational and interview data suggest that the process enabled participants to speak and listen respectfully to each other and to understand how each other’s experiences shaped their perspectives on policing. These data suggest that restorative practices are a viable method for enabling dialogue that can play an educational role and provide a space safely to discuss and reflect upon views and experiences of belonging, policing and police-community relations. While there is sufficient evidence to justify seeking to scale-up dialogic processes, it remains unclear whether and how the contribution that dialogue can make at the individual and local level could translate into cultural change at the institutional level, or address underlying structural inequalities.KEYWORDS: Police-community relationsDialogueRestorative practicesAn Garda SíochánaPolicingInstitutional racism AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the substantial effort from all project partners and participants in making this happen.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by funding from the Irish Research Council (New Foundations).
对话能帮助警察和年轻的黑人成年人相互理解吗?修复过程的主要发现
摘要警察与少数民族社区之间的关系往往表现为紧张、不信任和缺乏理解。解决方案似乎不太可能存在于传统的警察-社区参与方式。本文概述了第一项研究的主要发现,该研究使用恢复性实践来促进欧洲警察和年轻黑人成年人之间的对话。这发生在爱尔兰西都柏林的一个地区,那里的警察最近开枪打死了一名黑人男子。观察和访谈数据表明,这一过程使参与者能够互相尊重地说话和倾听,并了解彼此的经历如何塑造了他们对警务的看法。这些数据表明,恢复性做法是一种可行的对话方法,可以发挥教育作用,并提供一个安全的空间来讨论和反思关于归属感、警务和警察-社区关系的观点和经验。虽然有足够的证据证明寻求扩大对话进程是合理的,但目前尚不清楚对话在个人和地方一级所能做出的贡献是否以及如何转化为机构一级的文化变革,或解决潜在的结构性不平等问题。关键词:警察-社区关系对话恢复实践和警察SíochánaPolicingInstitutional种族主义我们感谢所有项目合作伙伴和参与者为实现这一目标所做的巨大努力。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由爱尔兰研究委员会(新基金会)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信