Ana Ailén Federico, Eric Pimet, Arnaud Coffin, Chantal Ducourtieux, Wilfried Queyrel, Andrés G. Rolhauser, Santiago L. Poggio, Jean-Philippe Guillemin, Manuel Blouin
{"title":"Ancient varieties can help control weed density while preserving weed diversity","authors":"Ana Ailén Federico, Eric Pimet, Arnaud Coffin, Chantal Ducourtieux, Wilfried Queyrel, Andrés G. Rolhauser, Santiago L. Poggio, Jean-Philippe Guillemin, Manuel Blouin","doi":"10.1080/01448765.2023.2270982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWeeds are a major component of agricultural diversity affecting crop yield and ecosystem services. Compared to modern wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties, ancient wheat cultivars (released before 1960) are taller, and this trait can be used to control weeds in organic farming systems. However, there is still a lack of quantitative assessments of the relative contribution of wheat breeding-history (ancient vs modern varieties) and synthetic inputs in explaining weed density and community structure. In this study, a field experiment was undertaken where five modern and five ancient wheat varieties were either treated as in a conventional system with synthetic inputs (nitrogen, herbicide and fungicide) or as in an organic system without the use of synthetic inputs. Crop light interception and weed density were recorded for 12 weeks until crop maturity. On average, ancient varieties reduced weed density by 17% compared with modern varieties, while the application of chemical inputs was responsible for an average reduction of 37%. The stronger competitive effect of ancient varieties was associated with increased sunlight interception. Species richness was higher in the absence of inputs for some weeks, but not by the end of the experiment. The field-based results illustrated that ancient varieties can be used to help control weed density in organic systems that do not rely on synthetic inputs for weed control Despite this effect of crop interference on weed density, a reduction in weed diversity was not observed. These findings could be of particular interest to promote agrobiodiversity in agricultural systems without synthetic inputs.KEYWORDS: Ancient and modern varietiescrop heightcrop interferencelight interceptionsynthetic chemical inputsweed community AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank L’Institut Agro Dijon for experimental facilities and the Argentina-France Agriculture Program (ARFAGRI) for the funding of travel costs of Ana Ailén Federico. They are grateful to Graines de Noé for providing the seeds of ancient varieties, especially Hélène Montaz for her advice to select the varieties. They also thank RAGT Semences, Secobra, Saaten Union and Limagrain for providing the modern varieties.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe data supporting the results are archived in Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8428384Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2023.2270982Additional informationFundingL’Institut Agro Dijon for experimental facilities and the Argentina-France Agriculture Program (ARFAGRI) for the travel costs.","PeriodicalId":8904,"journal":{"name":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Agriculture & Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2023.2270982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTWeeds are a major component of agricultural diversity affecting crop yield and ecosystem services. Compared to modern wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties, ancient wheat cultivars (released before 1960) are taller, and this trait can be used to control weeds in organic farming systems. However, there is still a lack of quantitative assessments of the relative contribution of wheat breeding-history (ancient vs modern varieties) and synthetic inputs in explaining weed density and community structure. In this study, a field experiment was undertaken where five modern and five ancient wheat varieties were either treated as in a conventional system with synthetic inputs (nitrogen, herbicide and fungicide) or as in an organic system without the use of synthetic inputs. Crop light interception and weed density were recorded for 12 weeks until crop maturity. On average, ancient varieties reduced weed density by 17% compared with modern varieties, while the application of chemical inputs was responsible for an average reduction of 37%. The stronger competitive effect of ancient varieties was associated with increased sunlight interception. Species richness was higher in the absence of inputs for some weeks, but not by the end of the experiment. The field-based results illustrated that ancient varieties can be used to help control weed density in organic systems that do not rely on synthetic inputs for weed control Despite this effect of crop interference on weed density, a reduction in weed diversity was not observed. These findings could be of particular interest to promote agrobiodiversity in agricultural systems without synthetic inputs.KEYWORDS: Ancient and modern varietiescrop heightcrop interferencelight interceptionsynthetic chemical inputsweed community AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank L’Institut Agro Dijon for experimental facilities and the Argentina-France Agriculture Program (ARFAGRI) for the funding of travel costs of Ana Ailén Federico. They are grateful to Graines de Noé for providing the seeds of ancient varieties, especially Hélène Montaz for her advice to select the varieties. They also thank RAGT Semences, Secobra, Saaten Union and Limagrain for providing the modern varieties.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe data supporting the results are archived in Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8428384Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2023.2270982Additional informationFundingL’Institut Agro Dijon for experimental facilities and the Argentina-France Agriculture Program (ARFAGRI) for the travel costs.
期刊介绍:
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture aims to act as the central focus for a wide range of studies into alternative systems of husbandry, and particularly the biological or organic approach to food production. The Journal publishes work of a sound scientific or economic nature related to any aspect of biological husbandry in agriculture, horticulture and forestry in both temperate and tropical conditions, including energy and water utilization, and environmental impact.