Emily Kaner, Emile Sanders, Mark D. Fleming, Tamar M. J. Antin
{"title":"How work impacts health and smoking practices among sexuality and gender minority young adults","authors":"Emily Kaner, Emile Sanders, Mark D. Fleming, Tamar M. J. Antin","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2023.2277123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhile work has been established as an important social determinant of health, it remains understudied in health inequities research. Although work has the potential to both promote and harm health, this analysis focuses on the health-compromising elements of work in a sample of sexuality and gender minority (SGM) young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area who participated in a study investigating nicotine and tobacco (NT) use practices. Survey and interview data were collected from 100 participants ages 18–25 who reported current or former NT use. In-depth qualitative interviews explored their experiences of daily life, social identities and beliefs about structural oppression, practices of NT use, and perceptions of health and wellbeing. A thematic analysis of the narratives highlighted the centrality of work to daily life. Participants described how work structured time and became a site of daily exploitation. They also identified the structural barriers that shape employment opportunities for SGM young adults, compromising health, and shaping NT use. Results elucidate the harmful practices embedded in daily work and the inequities within the structure of work itself, underscoring the need to shift focus away from individual behaviors like NT use and towards the structural factors that perpetuate health inequities.KEYWORDS: Social determinants of healthhealth inequitiessexuality and gender minoritiesworksmoking AcknowledgementsSincere appreciation goes to the 100 study participants who willingly gave their time to participate in this study.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementDue to problems associated with anonymizing participants’ narrative data, the dataset has not been approved by the IRB to be deposited in a publicly available data repository. However, interested parties may contact the principal Investigator, Tamar Antin at tamar@criticalpublichealth.org to request anonymized data and study materials.Additional informationFundingThis research and preparation of this manuscript were supported by grant #T30IR0890 from the California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of TRDRP.","PeriodicalId":51469,"journal":{"name":"Critical Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2023.2277123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTWhile work has been established as an important social determinant of health, it remains understudied in health inequities research. Although work has the potential to both promote and harm health, this analysis focuses on the health-compromising elements of work in a sample of sexuality and gender minority (SGM) young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area who participated in a study investigating nicotine and tobacco (NT) use practices. Survey and interview data were collected from 100 participants ages 18–25 who reported current or former NT use. In-depth qualitative interviews explored their experiences of daily life, social identities and beliefs about structural oppression, practices of NT use, and perceptions of health and wellbeing. A thematic analysis of the narratives highlighted the centrality of work to daily life. Participants described how work structured time and became a site of daily exploitation. They also identified the structural barriers that shape employment opportunities for SGM young adults, compromising health, and shaping NT use. Results elucidate the harmful practices embedded in daily work and the inequities within the structure of work itself, underscoring the need to shift focus away from individual behaviors like NT use and towards the structural factors that perpetuate health inequities.KEYWORDS: Social determinants of healthhealth inequitiessexuality and gender minoritiesworksmoking AcknowledgementsSincere appreciation goes to the 100 study participants who willingly gave their time to participate in this study.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementDue to problems associated with anonymizing participants’ narrative data, the dataset has not been approved by the IRB to be deposited in a publicly available data repository. However, interested parties may contact the principal Investigator, Tamar Antin at tamar@criticalpublichealth.org to request anonymized data and study materials.Additional informationFundingThis research and preparation of this manuscript were supported by grant #T30IR0890 from the California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of TRDRP.
期刊介绍:
Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.