ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES IN PREDICTION OF COVID-19 MORTALITY AND ITS RELATED FACTORS: A MULTI-CENTER STUDY

IF 0.3 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Abolfazl Payandeh, Habibollah Esmaily, Masoud Salehi, Seyed Mahdi Amir Jahanshahi, Zahra Arab Borzu, Ahmad Bolouri
{"title":"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES IN PREDICTION OF COVID-19 MORTALITY AND ITS RELATED FACTORS: A MULTI-CENTER STUDY","authors":"Abolfazl Payandeh, Habibollah Esmaily, Masoud Salehi, Seyed Mahdi Amir Jahanshahi, Zahra Arab Borzu, Ahmad Bolouri","doi":"10.17654/0972361723064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictive artificial intelligence (AI) models for the assessment of factors and trends related to disease prevalence, prognosis, and the risk prediction of mortality in the early phases, seem to be effective techniques. Machine learning (ML) algorithms as a branch of AI methods have had a considerable role in controlling and management of COVID-19 and previous pandemics. The present study estimates the mortality risk among COVID-19 patients based on ML algorithms, prediction of outcomes in new cases, and also determines the top significant features related to morality in the patients. In this retrospective research, 7115 patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease were included in the study. The information was collected from 35 different hospitals across Khorasan-Razavi province, Northeast of Iran during 20 February 2020 - 21 June 2021. We employed random forests (RF), decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and boosted trees (BT) ML algorithms. Our findings indicated that the RF model had better performance in different criteria. The RF algorithm had area under curve (AUC) of 88%, accuracy of 96%, precision of 96%, sensitivity of 99%, and specificity of 80%. Intubation, SpO2, age, time from symptoms, loss of consciousness, reception season, and diabetes were the seven ordered and significant predictors of the risk of COVID-19 patients’ death. RF model can aid in clinical decision-making and limited resource allocation. This model needs to be externally validated in larger populations, more features, and multicenter settings. Received: August 4, 2023Accepted: September 13, 2023","PeriodicalId":43137,"journal":{"name":"Advances and Applications in Statistics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances and Applications in Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361723064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive artificial intelligence (AI) models for the assessment of factors and trends related to disease prevalence, prognosis, and the risk prediction of mortality in the early phases, seem to be effective techniques. Machine learning (ML) algorithms as a branch of AI methods have had a considerable role in controlling and management of COVID-19 and previous pandemics. The present study estimates the mortality risk among COVID-19 patients based on ML algorithms, prediction of outcomes in new cases, and also determines the top significant features related to morality in the patients. In this retrospective research, 7115 patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease were included in the study. The information was collected from 35 different hospitals across Khorasan-Razavi province, Northeast of Iran during 20 February 2020 - 21 June 2021. We employed random forests (RF), decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and boosted trees (BT) ML algorithms. Our findings indicated that the RF model had better performance in different criteria. The RF algorithm had area under curve (AUC) of 88%, accuracy of 96%, precision of 96%, sensitivity of 99%, and specificity of 80%. Intubation, SpO2, age, time from symptoms, loss of consciousness, reception season, and diabetes were the seven ordered and significant predictors of the risk of COVID-19 patients’ death. RF model can aid in clinical decision-making and limited resource allocation. This model needs to be externally validated in larger populations, more features, and multicenter settings. Received: August 4, 2023Accepted: September 13, 2023
人工智能技术预测COVID-19死亡率及其相关因素:一项多中心研究
用于评估与疾病流行、预后和早期死亡风险预测相关的因素和趋势的预测性人工智能(AI)模型似乎是有效的技术。机器学习算法作为人工智能方法的一个分支,在COVID-19和以前的大流行的控制和管理中发挥了相当大的作用。本研究基于ML算法估计COVID-19患者的死亡风险,预测新病例的预后,并确定患者道德相关的最重要特征。在这项回顾性研究中,7115例确诊的COVID-19疾病患者被纳入研究。这些信息是在2020年2月20日至2021年6月21日期间从伊朗东北部呼罗珊-拉扎维省35家不同医院收集的。我们采用了随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)、人工神经网络(ANN)、支持向量机(SVM)、逻辑回归(LR)和增强树(BT) ML算法。我们的研究结果表明,RF模型在不同的标准下具有更好的性能。RF算法曲线下面积(AUC)为88%,准确度为96%,精密度为96%,灵敏度为99%,特异度为80%。插管、SpO2、年龄、离症状时间、意识丧失、接受治疗季节和糖尿病是COVID-19患者死亡风险的七个有序且显著的预测因素。射频模型可以帮助临床决策和有限的资源分配。该模型需要在更大的人群、更多的特征和多中心设置中进行外部验证。收稿日期:2023年8月4日。收稿日期:2023年9月13日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances and Applications in Statistics
Advances and Applications in Statistics STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书