Felat Dursun, E. Deniz Oğuz-Kırca, Vedat Toprak, Aytaç Coşkun
{"title":"Reconstruction of an Ancient Hill Used as an On-Site Quarry: Castrum Zerzevan (SE-Türkiye)","authors":"Felat Dursun, E. Deniz Oğuz-Kırca, Vedat Toprak, Aytaç Coşkun","doi":"10.1080/15583058.2023.2268015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe Roman period Castrum Zerzevan is on a hill 35 km south of Diyarbakır, Türkiye. Various field evidence (e.g. petrographic similarities, sudden changes of the topographic contours, the morphology of the nearby hills, and traces of the on-site quarry activities) suggests that the topography of the hilltop was artificially modified and used as a quarry. This study aims to introduce an approach that creates the ancient topography and calculates and verifies the volume of the on-site material required to build the fortification and associated structures by applying morphological analyses. The primary objective of the methodology is to reconstruct the site’s ancient topography and examine the difference between its former and present surfaces. The result indicates that approximately 36% of the extracted material was used in the enclosure. The overall findings and site investigations suggest quarrying and construction activities were carried out in a planned manner or concurrently at the site. In addition to the collected samples’ petrographic and geochemical similarities, the Castrum‘s topographical modifications and the suitability of the geological unit as a building material support our claim that the Romans were well aware of environmental conditions (including topography and morphology) and material performance.KEYWORDS: Ancient topographybuilding techniquecastrum romanageomorphologyquarryzerzevan castle AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to the Castrum Zerzevan Excavation Team for all their hard work, care and assistance throughout the entire steps of this project. The authors also acknowledge the financial support provided by Dicle University/Scientific Research Project Coordination Office (DÜBAP) under the grant number MÜHENDİSLİK.18.007.Author contributionsState of art and research questions: Vedat Toprak, Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaResearch design: Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaData collection: Felat Dursun, Vedat Toprak, Deniz Oğuz-Kırca and Aytaç CoşkunInterpretation of the results: Felat Dursun, Vedat Toprak, Deniz Oğuz-Kırca and Aytaç CoşkunWriting and edition: Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Particular information is conveyed in some travel anecdotes. Indicatively (Buckingham Citation1827), pp. 384–390.2 In line with the knowledge contained in the passages of ancient writers, the critical legion headquarters in Anatolia were founded in Melitene (Gabriel Citation1940, 264–269) (Malatya); Zeugma (for Legio IV (Scythica, Wagner Citation1977, 517–540) (Belkıs); Samosata (Adıyaman) and Satala (Lightfoot Citation1998), pp. 273–284 (Hartmann et al. Citation2006); (Gümüşhane) (Cary and Foster Citation1925. For those who organized at this level by establishing headquarters as well as many other legions stationed in Anatolia, Parker Citation2000, 122; Uzunoğlu Citation2012, 96–97). Over the region, the Zeugma legion settlement is closest to that of Amida and Dara but represents a civic case (Görkay Citation2017, 149, 165).Additional informationFundingThis research received a partial grant from the Dicle University/Scientific Research Project Coordination Office (DÜBAP). Grant No: MÜHENDİSLİK.18.007","PeriodicalId":13783,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Architectural Heritage","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Architectural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2023.2268015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe Roman period Castrum Zerzevan is on a hill 35 km south of Diyarbakır, Türkiye. Various field evidence (e.g. petrographic similarities, sudden changes of the topographic contours, the morphology of the nearby hills, and traces of the on-site quarry activities) suggests that the topography of the hilltop was artificially modified and used as a quarry. This study aims to introduce an approach that creates the ancient topography and calculates and verifies the volume of the on-site material required to build the fortification and associated structures by applying morphological analyses. The primary objective of the methodology is to reconstruct the site’s ancient topography and examine the difference between its former and present surfaces. The result indicates that approximately 36% of the extracted material was used in the enclosure. The overall findings and site investigations suggest quarrying and construction activities were carried out in a planned manner or concurrently at the site. In addition to the collected samples’ petrographic and geochemical similarities, the Castrum‘s topographical modifications and the suitability of the geological unit as a building material support our claim that the Romans were well aware of environmental conditions (including topography and morphology) and material performance.KEYWORDS: Ancient topographybuilding techniquecastrum romanageomorphologyquarryzerzevan castle AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to the Castrum Zerzevan Excavation Team for all their hard work, care and assistance throughout the entire steps of this project. The authors also acknowledge the financial support provided by Dicle University/Scientific Research Project Coordination Office (DÜBAP) under the grant number MÜHENDİSLİK.18.007.Author contributionsState of art and research questions: Vedat Toprak, Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaResearch design: Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaData collection: Felat Dursun, Vedat Toprak, Deniz Oğuz-Kırca and Aytaç CoşkunInterpretation of the results: Felat Dursun, Vedat Toprak, Deniz Oğuz-Kırca and Aytaç CoşkunWriting and edition: Felat Dursun and Deniz Oğuz-KırcaAll authors read and approved the final manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Particular information is conveyed in some travel anecdotes. Indicatively (Buckingham Citation1827), pp. 384–390.2 In line with the knowledge contained in the passages of ancient writers, the critical legion headquarters in Anatolia were founded in Melitene (Gabriel Citation1940, 264–269) (Malatya); Zeugma (for Legio IV (Scythica, Wagner Citation1977, 517–540) (Belkıs); Samosata (Adıyaman) and Satala (Lightfoot Citation1998), pp. 273–284 (Hartmann et al. Citation2006); (Gümüşhane) (Cary and Foster Citation1925. For those who organized at this level by establishing headquarters as well as many other legions stationed in Anatolia, Parker Citation2000, 122; Uzunoğlu Citation2012, 96–97). Over the region, the Zeugma legion settlement is closest to that of Amida and Dara but represents a civic case (Görkay Citation2017, 149, 165).Additional informationFundingThis research received a partial grant from the Dicle University/Scientific Research Project Coordination Office (DÜBAP). Grant No: MÜHENDİSLİK.18.007
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Architectural Heritage provides a multidisciplinary scientific overview of existing resources and modern technologies useful for the study and repair of historical buildings and other structures. The journal will include information on history, methodology, materials, survey, inspection, non-destructive testing, analysis, diagnosis, remedial measures, and strengthening techniques.
Preservation of the architectural heritage is considered a fundamental issue in the life of modern societies. In addition to their historical interest, cultural heritage buildings are valuable because they contribute significantly to the economy by providing key attractions in a context where tourism and leisure are major industries in the 3rd millennium. The need of preserving historical constructions is thus not only a cultural requirement, but also an economical and developmental demand.
The study of historical buildings and other structures must be undertaken from an approach based on the use of modern technologies and science. The final aim must be to select and adequately manage the possible technical means needed to attain the required understanding of the morphology and the structural behavior of the construction and to characterize its repair needs. Modern requirements for an intervention include reversibility, unobtrusiveness, minimum repair, and respect of the original construction, as well as the obvious functional and structural requirements. Restoration operations complying with these principles require a scientific, multidisciplinary approach that comprehends historical understanding, modern non-destructive inspection techniques, and advanced experimental and computer methods of analysis.