Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review

Tara Opsal, India Luxton
{"title":"Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review","authors":"Tara Opsal, India Luxton","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2023.2278192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSince the 1970s, feminist criminologists have challenged researchers and practitioners to center gender in their theories, research designs, and practice approaches. Because of this, a large body of research examines correctional approaches to assess the question “what works” for women? Researchers have, for example, examined: how gender shapes pathways into the system or how correctional programming and staff can meet women’s needs. At times these queries include studying the effectiveness of using gender responsive approaches. Little is known, however, regarding the effects of these strategies in the community corrections context. Women make up a substantially larger proportion of the community corrections population than they do prison or jail. Additionally, because the philosophy of this context is well suited to engage rehabilitative and treatment-based programs—needs of amplified importance for system involved women—understanding what we know as researchers and practitioners is particularly important. To assess the state of knowledge in this area, we conducted a scoping review of research on gender responsive programming within community corrections settings. Our analysis reviews the findings from these articles and highlights implications for practitioners and researchers working in this area.KEYWORDS: Female Reintegrationprobationgender Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We exclude studies on juveniles because own research question focuses on adult women in the community corrections space. We chose this scope because while some factors bind the experiences of system-involved women and girls together, the institutional responses and experiences between these two populations is different. Thus, we did not want to risk underestimating or rendering unique findings invisible.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Bureau of Justice Assistance [2020-DJ-21-06-13-1].","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2023.2278192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTSince the 1970s, feminist criminologists have challenged researchers and practitioners to center gender in their theories, research designs, and practice approaches. Because of this, a large body of research examines correctional approaches to assess the question “what works” for women? Researchers have, for example, examined: how gender shapes pathways into the system or how correctional programming and staff can meet women’s needs. At times these queries include studying the effectiveness of using gender responsive approaches. Little is known, however, regarding the effects of these strategies in the community corrections context. Women make up a substantially larger proportion of the community corrections population than they do prison or jail. Additionally, because the philosophy of this context is well suited to engage rehabilitative and treatment-based programs—needs of amplified importance for system involved women—understanding what we know as researchers and practitioners is particularly important. To assess the state of knowledge in this area, we conducted a scoping review of research on gender responsive programming within community corrections settings. Our analysis reviews the findings from these articles and highlights implications for practitioners and researchers working in this area.KEYWORDS: Female Reintegrationprobationgender Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We exclude studies on juveniles because own research question focuses on adult women in the community corrections space. We chose this scope because while some factors bind the experiences of system-involved women and girls together, the institutional responses and experiences between these two populations is different. Thus, we did not want to risk underestimating or rendering unique findings invisible.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Bureau of Justice Assistance [2020-DJ-21-06-13-1].
社区矫正环境中促进妇女性别平等的方案编制:范围审查
摘要自20世纪70年代以来,女性主义犯罪学家对研究人员和实践者提出了挑战,要求他们在理论、研究设计和实践方法中以性别为中心。正因为如此,大量的研究检查了惩教方法,以评估“什么对女性有效”这个问题?例如,研究人员研究了:性别如何塑造进入该系统的途径,或惩教计划和工作人员如何满足妇女的需求。有时,这些问题包括研究使用促进性别平等方法的有效性。然而,关于这些策略在社区矫正环境中的效果,我们所知甚少。妇女在社区矫正人员中所占的比例远远高于监狱或拘留所。此外,由于这一背景的理念非常适合参与以康复和治疗为基础的项目——对于涉及系统的女性来说,需求的重要性被放大了——理解我们作为研究人员和实践者所知道的是特别重要的。为了评估这一领域的知识状况,我们对社区矫正环境中性别敏感方案的研究进行了范围审查。我们的分析回顾了这些文章的发现,并强调了在这一领域工作的从业者和研究人员的含义。关键词:女性重返社会试用期性别披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。我们排除了对青少年的研究,因为我们自己的研究问题集中在社区矫正空间中的成年女性。我们之所以选择这一范围,是因为虽然某些因素将参与系统的妇女和女孩的经验联系在一起,但这两个群体之间的机构反应和经验是不同的。因此,我们不想冒险低估或使独特的发现不可见。这项工作得到了司法援助局的支持[2020-DJ-21-06-13-1]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信