Synthesis, Bioactivity Evaluation, and Molecular Docking Study of Tranilast Analogs as Anticancer Agents

IF 0.7 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC
Phuong-Thuy T. Phan, Tuan-Anh N. Pham, Ngoc Phuong Nguyen, Van-Anh Tran Nguyen, Tuyet Hong Nguyen
{"title":"Synthesis, Bioactivity Evaluation, and Molecular Docking Study of Tranilast Analogs as Anticancer Agents","authors":"Phuong-Thuy T. Phan, Tuan-Anh N. Pham, Ngoc Phuong Nguyen, Van-Anh Tran Nguyen, Tuyet Hong Nguyen","doi":"10.2174/0115701786268073230926160649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Developing new agents with higher therapeutic potential and less toxicity to overcome the limitations of chemotherapy in cancer treatment has been identified as an urgent need and priority. Recent studies have shown promising anticancer activities of tranilast when used alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. This research aims to synthesize tranilast analogs, evaluate in vitro anticancer activity, and dock into the TGFβ1 target to find stronger anticancer agents. Tranilast (5a) and analogs (5b–f) were synthesized from anthranilic acid derivatives, Meldrum’s acid, and benzaldehydes based on the Knoevenagel-Doebner reaction. The compounds were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity activity by MTT assay and docked into the TGFβ1 target using AutoDockTools–1.5.6. Tranilast (5a) and seven analogs (5b–h) were successfully synthesized and analyzed for their structures. Four analogs (5b–d, 5f) possessed stronger effects on both HepG2 and MCF-7 cell lines with proliferation inhibitions at concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the range of 41 to 95% compared to tranilast (16.95% and 22.64%). Compound 5f exhibited the most potent analog with IC50 = 27.57 µg/mL (HepG2) and 16.67 µg/mL (MCF-7) compared to tranilast (IC50 > 100 µg/mL) and had good binding affinity on TGFβ1 target (docking score ˗7.35 Kcal/mol). Four of seven tranilast analogs possessed stronger cytotoxicity activity on both HepG2 and MCF-7 cell lines compared to that of the parent compound, tranilast. Notably, compound 5f displayed the most potent activity and good binding affinity on the TGFβ1 target, indicating the potential for further study as an anticancer agent.","PeriodicalId":18116,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Organic Chemistry","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Organic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701786268073230926160649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Developing new agents with higher therapeutic potential and less toxicity to overcome the limitations of chemotherapy in cancer treatment has been identified as an urgent need and priority. Recent studies have shown promising anticancer activities of tranilast when used alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. This research aims to synthesize tranilast analogs, evaluate in vitro anticancer activity, and dock into the TGFβ1 target to find stronger anticancer agents. Tranilast (5a) and analogs (5b–f) were synthesized from anthranilic acid derivatives, Meldrum’s acid, and benzaldehydes based on the Knoevenagel-Doebner reaction. The compounds were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity activity by MTT assay and docked into the TGFβ1 target using AutoDockTools–1.5.6. Tranilast (5a) and seven analogs (5b–h) were successfully synthesized and analyzed for their structures. Four analogs (5b–d, 5f) possessed stronger effects on both HepG2 and MCF-7 cell lines with proliferation inhibitions at concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the range of 41 to 95% compared to tranilast (16.95% and 22.64%). Compound 5f exhibited the most potent analog with IC50 = 27.57 µg/mL (HepG2) and 16.67 µg/mL (MCF-7) compared to tranilast (IC50 > 100 µg/mL) and had good binding affinity on TGFβ1 target (docking score ˗7.35 Kcal/mol). Four of seven tranilast analogs possessed stronger cytotoxicity activity on both HepG2 and MCF-7 cell lines compared to that of the parent compound, tranilast. Notably, compound 5f displayed the most potent activity and good binding affinity on the TGFβ1 target, indicating the potential for further study as an anticancer agent.
曲尼司特类似物的合成、生物活性评价及分子对接研究
摘要:开发具有更高治疗潜力和更低毒性的新药物来克服化疗在癌症治疗中的局限性已被确定为迫切需要和优先事项。最近的研究表明曲尼司特在单独使用或与其他化疗药物联合使用时具有良好的抗癌活性。本研究旨在合成曲尼司特类似物,评估其体外抗癌活性,对接tgf - β1靶点,寻找更强的抗癌药物。曲尼司特(5a)和类似物(5b-f)是根据Knoevenagel-Doebner反应由邻氨基苯甲酸衍生物、Meldrum酸和苯甲醛合成的。通过MTT法评估化合物的体外细胞毒性活性,并使用AutoDockTools-1.5.6对接到tgf - β1靶点。成功合成了曲尼司特(5a)和7个类似物(5b-h),并对其结构进行了分析。4种类似物(5b-d, 5f)对HepG2和MCF-7细胞系均有较强的增殖抑制作用,浓度为100µg/mL,在41 ~ 95%范围内,比曲尼司特(16.95%和22.64%)具有更强的增殖抑制作用。与曲尼司特相比,化合物5f的IC50分别为27.57µg/mL (HepG2)和16.67µg/mL (MCF-7)。100µg/mL),对tgf - β1靶点具有良好的结合亲和力(对接分数为:7.35 Kcal/mol)。与母体化合物曲尼司特相比,7种曲尼司特类似物中有4种对HepG2和MCF-7细胞系具有更强的细胞毒性活性。值得注意的是,化合物5f对tgf - β1靶点表现出最强的活性和良好的结合亲和力,表明其作为抗癌药物有进一步研究的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Letters in Organic Chemistry
Letters in Organic Chemistry 化学-有机化学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
135
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Letters in Organic Chemistry publishes original letters (short articles), research articles, mini-reviews and thematic issues based on mini-reviews and short articles, in all areas of organic chemistry including synthesis, bioorganic, medicinal, natural products, organometallic, supramolecular, molecular recognition and physical organic chemistry. The emphasis is to publish quality papers rapidly by taking full advantage of latest technology for both submission and review of the manuscripts. The journal is an essential reading for all organic chemists belonging to both academia and industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信