How can the routine use of face masks by medical professionals affect hearing-impaired patients’ perception of speech? A case–control study

Nashwa Nada, Mohamed Osama Tomoum, Reham Mamdouh Lasheen
{"title":"How can the routine use of face masks by medical professionals affect hearing-impaired patients’ perception of speech? A case–control study","authors":"Nashwa Nada, Mohamed Osama Tomoum, Reham Mamdouh Lasheen","doi":"10.1186/s43163-023-00520-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Facemasks are routinely used among healthcare providers, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they negatively impact speech perception. Our study investigated how speech perception using the word discrimination score (WDS) was affected by wearing surgical and KN95 masks while dealing with hearing-impaired healthcare recipients. Method This case–control study included 60 participants [15 with normal hearing and 45 with varied degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL)], for whom word discrimination scores (WDS) were evaluated under various mask conditions. Results On applying repeated measures of two-way analysis of variance (RM two-way ANOVA), there was statistically significant interaction ( p = 0.0018), meaning that the level by which the mask affects the WDS depends on the underlying hearing level. Both main factors showed a statistically significant effect ( p < 0.0001). Surgical masks had a lesser impact on speech discrimination compared to KN 95. Conclusions It was concluded that KN95 severely impacted the WDS among all groups relative to surgical mask and the no-mask condition. Although the high-frequency SNHL (HF-SNHL) group had mild hearing loss in the pure tone audiometry (PTA) average, they showed lower WDS relative to the mild to moderate flat SNHL (MM-SNHL). Moderately severe to severe SNHL expressed the worst values. As a result, the surgical mask is recommended over the KN95 mask since it provides better speech discrimination while giving adequate protection. These findings should be taken into consideration as they will have an impact on communication, especially in situations like hospitals where the patients must understand the instructors and healthcare providers very well.","PeriodicalId":321335,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00520-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Facemasks are routinely used among healthcare providers, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they negatively impact speech perception. Our study investigated how speech perception using the word discrimination score (WDS) was affected by wearing surgical and KN95 masks while dealing with hearing-impaired healthcare recipients. Method This case–control study included 60 participants [15 with normal hearing and 45 with varied degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL)], for whom word discrimination scores (WDS) were evaluated under various mask conditions. Results On applying repeated measures of two-way analysis of variance (RM two-way ANOVA), there was statistically significant interaction ( p = 0.0018), meaning that the level by which the mask affects the WDS depends on the underlying hearing level. Both main factors showed a statistically significant effect ( p < 0.0001). Surgical masks had a lesser impact on speech discrimination compared to KN 95. Conclusions It was concluded that KN95 severely impacted the WDS among all groups relative to surgical mask and the no-mask condition. Although the high-frequency SNHL (HF-SNHL) group had mild hearing loss in the pure tone audiometry (PTA) average, they showed lower WDS relative to the mild to moderate flat SNHL (MM-SNHL). Moderately severe to severe SNHL expressed the worst values. As a result, the surgical mask is recommended over the KN95 mask since it provides better speech discrimination while giving adequate protection. These findings should be taken into consideration as they will have an impact on communication, especially in situations like hospitals where the patients must understand the instructors and healthcare providers very well.
医护人员日常使用口罩会如何影响听障患者的言语感知?病例对照研究
背景口罩是医疗保健提供者的常规使用,特别是在COVID-19大流行之后。然而,它们会对语音感知产生负面影响。我们的研究调查了使用单词辨别分数(WDS)的语音感知如何受到戴外科口罩和KN95口罩在处理听力受损的医疗保健接受者时的影响。方法采用病例对照研究方法,对60例听力正常者(15例)和不同程度感音神经性听力损失者(45例)进行不同蒙罩条件下的单词辨析评分(WDS)评估。结果应用重复测量的双向方差分析(RM - two- ANOVA),有统计学显著的相互作用(p = 0.0018),这意味着口罩对WDS的影响程度取决于潜在的听力水平。两个主要因素均有统计学显著影响(p <0.0001)。与kn95相比,医用口罩对言语歧视的影响较小。结论与外科口罩和无口罩相比,KN95对各组WDS的影响更大。高频SNHL (HF-SNHL)组在纯音听力学(PTA)平均听力损失较轻,但其WDS较轻至中度扁平SNHL (MM-SNHL)组低。中度至重度SNHL表现出最差值。因此,外科口罩比KN95口罩更受欢迎,因为它在提供充分保护的同时提供了更好的语音识别。这些发现应该被考虑在内,因为它们会对沟通产生影响,特别是在医院这样的情况下,患者必须非常了解教师和医疗保健提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信