Sample size simulation for unit root, structural break and regime shifts

V.A. Micheal, M.O. Adenomon, N.O. Nweze
{"title":"Sample size simulation for unit root, structural break and regime shifts","authors":"V.A. Micheal, M.O. Adenomon, N.O. Nweze","doi":"10.4314/swj.v18i2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unit root test is an important means to determine the integration order of a variable which has involved different methods of testing for stationarity. Simulation method is adopted in this study to verify whether unit root, structural breaks and regime shifts exist in the sample considered. For sample sizes of 20 and 50 as small, 100 and 250 as medium, and 2500 and 5000 as large, the enhanced Dickey-Fuller test and Zivot-Andrews test were used. The experiment was conducted 5000 times for each sample size, and the results demonstrated that there is presence of unit root at level for all sample sizes taken into consideration, but they were integrated of order 1. This implies that they are stationary at first difference. The results also showed that there are structural breaks at various levels depending on sample size, but it was noted that the breaks remained stable regardless of size when the sample size was large. The MSVAR results demonstrated that regime 1 is more resilient than regime 2, and that regime 1 is projected to last longer than regime 2. As a result, we draw the conclusion that simulation can be utilized to verify a real-world situation.","PeriodicalId":21583,"journal":{"name":"Science World Journal","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v18i2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unit root test is an important means to determine the integration order of a variable which has involved different methods of testing for stationarity. Simulation method is adopted in this study to verify whether unit root, structural breaks and regime shifts exist in the sample considered. For sample sizes of 20 and 50 as small, 100 and 250 as medium, and 2500 and 5000 as large, the enhanced Dickey-Fuller test and Zivot-Andrews test were used. The experiment was conducted 5000 times for each sample size, and the results demonstrated that there is presence of unit root at level for all sample sizes taken into consideration, but they were integrated of order 1. This implies that they are stationary at first difference. The results also showed that there are structural breaks at various levels depending on sample size, but it was noted that the breaks remained stable regardless of size when the sample size was large. The MSVAR results demonstrated that regime 1 is more resilient than regime 2, and that regime 1 is projected to last longer than regime 2. As a result, we draw the conclusion that simulation can be utilized to verify a real-world situation.
单位根、结构断裂和状态转移的样本量模拟
单位根检验是确定变量积分阶数的重要手段,它涉及到不同的平稳性检验方法。本研究采用模拟方法验证所考虑的样本中是否存在单位根、结构断裂和状态转移。小样本量为20和50,中样本量为100和250,大样本量为2500和5000,采用增强型Dickey-Fuller检验和Zivot-Andrews检验。实验对每个样本量进行了5000次,结果表明,在考虑所有样本量的水平上都存在单位根,但它们是1阶的积分。这意味着它们在初始差时是平稳的。结果还表明,随样本量的不同,存在不同程度的结构性断裂,但值得注意的是,当样本量很大时,无论样本量大小,断裂都保持稳定。MSVAR结果表明,制度1比制度2更具弹性,制度1预计比制度2持续时间更长。因此,我们得出的结论是,模拟可以用来验证一个真实的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信