Rethinking ecoanxiety through environmental moral distress: an ethics reflection

Nicola Banwell , Nadja Eggert
{"title":"Rethinking ecoanxiety through environmental moral distress: an ethics reflection","authors":"Nicola Banwell ,&nbsp;Nadja Eggert","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humanity is currently confronted with simultaneous complex environmental crises of unprecedented scale. These include, but are not limited to, the ongoing sixth mass extinction and the depletion of biodiversity, and ongoing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which are causing changes in the climate that humanity has never before witnessed. As these ecological crises continue to progress, there is increasing recognition of the impact this has on mental health. Within this context, the notion of ecoanxiety has gained traction, primarily from the perspective of psychology, with the view to elevate suffering. However, in our view, the risk of considering ecoanxiety, and other ecological emotions, solely from a medicalized perspective as a mental disorder is that it places too much responsibility on individuals, decontextualizes ecological emotions from their social and political settings, and detaches these emotions from their ethical and moral dimensions. This article proposes to reconsider ecological emotions from the perspective of moral distress. Environmental moral distress resituates ecological emotions within their social and political contexts, and sheds light on their entanglement with ethical realms that medicalized conceptions of ecoanxiety fail to recognize. We argue that responding to environmental moral distress requires a shift to an ethics of care and ecofeminist paradigm which enables us to consider ecological emotions as contextualized indicators of the experience of morally questionable actions. This approach opens the door to collective responses aiming to empower and build moral agency in the face of the shared moral and political struggles which characterize the ecological crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000822/pdfft?md5=8e608bd7279dc0004a866af052d8b604&pid=1-s2.0-S2667278223000822-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humanity is currently confronted with simultaneous complex environmental crises of unprecedented scale. These include, but are not limited to, the ongoing sixth mass extinction and the depletion of biodiversity, and ongoing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which are causing changes in the climate that humanity has never before witnessed. As these ecological crises continue to progress, there is increasing recognition of the impact this has on mental health. Within this context, the notion of ecoanxiety has gained traction, primarily from the perspective of psychology, with the view to elevate suffering. However, in our view, the risk of considering ecoanxiety, and other ecological emotions, solely from a medicalized perspective as a mental disorder is that it places too much responsibility on individuals, decontextualizes ecological emotions from their social and political settings, and detaches these emotions from their ethical and moral dimensions. This article proposes to reconsider ecological emotions from the perspective of moral distress. Environmental moral distress resituates ecological emotions within their social and political contexts, and sheds light on their entanglement with ethical realms that medicalized conceptions of ecoanxiety fail to recognize. We argue that responding to environmental moral distress requires a shift to an ethics of care and ecofeminist paradigm which enables us to consider ecological emotions as contextualized indicators of the experience of morally questionable actions. This approach opens the door to collective responses aiming to empower and build moral agency in the face of the shared moral and political struggles which characterize the ecological crisis.

通过环境道德困扰反思生态焦虑:伦理学反思
当前,人类正同时面临着规模空前的复杂环境危机。其中包括但不限于正在进行的第六次物种大灭绝和生物多样性的枯竭,以及正在造成人类从未见过的气候变化的人为温室气体排放。随着这些生态危机的持续发展,人们越来越认识到这对心理健康的影响。在这种背景下,生态焦虑的概念获得了牵引力,主要是从心理学的角度来看,其观点是提升痛苦。然而,在我们看来,仅仅从医学角度将生态焦虑和其他生态情绪视为一种精神障碍的风险在于,它将太多的责任放在了个人身上,将生态情绪从他们的社会和政治环境中分离出来,并将这些情绪从他们的伦理和道德维度中分离出来。本文提出从道德困境的角度重新审视生态情感。环境道德困境在其社会和政治背景下抵制生态情感,并揭示了他们与医学化的生态焦虑概念未能认识到的伦理领域的纠缠。我们认为,应对环境道德困境需要转向关怀伦理和生态女性主义范式,这使我们能够将生态情感视为道德问题行为经验的情境化指标。这种方法为集体反应打开了大门,旨在增强和建立道德机构,面对共同的道德和政治斗争,这是生态危机的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信