The situation in the fight against the pandemic in Ukraine just before the war was improving

Mariia Skulysh, Antoni Wilinski, Artur Kozłowski
{"title":"The situation in the fight against the pandemic in Ukraine just before the war was improving","authors":"Mariia Skulysh, Antoni Wilinski, Artur Kozłowski","doi":"10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the article is to compare the efficiency of pandemic management in two conflicting countries - Russia and Ukraine. The thesis about the superiority of Russia over Ukraine in terms of many social and economic factors seemed obvious. Reality measured with logically defined data contradicts this thesis. The use of statistical data ended on the day the war began. Design/methodology/approach: Each of the two considered countries was treated as an administrative structure divided into regions (oblasts). It was assumed that the quality of regional management by the central authority should be assessed on the basis of fair and equal treatment of all regions. This assessment was made for two statistical factors - the number of deaths and the number of vaccinations, whose distribution in the country was assessed according to the Gini index. Findings: Just before the war broke out – in February 2021, indicators of efficient pandemic management in the regions were better for Ukraine than for Russia. Ukraine recovered from the pandemic faster. This is a rather unexpected result. The article justifies the historical background of the centuries-old social and political relations between Russia and Ukraine, also using the position of Poland in these relations. Research limitations/implications: The presented research, together with its methodology, can be repeated for any administrative structure (state, group of countries), regions, cities, etc. An obvious requirement for conducting such research is the availability of reliable data on deaths and vaccinations. Practical implications: The method can be used to assess the efficiency of pandemic management at any administrative level (states, regions, groups of cities, etc.). Originality/value: An important novelty and the result of the research is the discovery of the Ukrainian organizational advantage in the fight against the pandemic just before the outbreak of the war. Keywords: Ukraine's war with Russia, COVID-19, vaccinations, pandemic deaths, pandemic management. Category of the paper: Research paper.","PeriodicalId":23940,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to compare the efficiency of pandemic management in two conflicting countries - Russia and Ukraine. The thesis about the superiority of Russia over Ukraine in terms of many social and economic factors seemed obvious. Reality measured with logically defined data contradicts this thesis. The use of statistical data ended on the day the war began. Design/methodology/approach: Each of the two considered countries was treated as an administrative structure divided into regions (oblasts). It was assumed that the quality of regional management by the central authority should be assessed on the basis of fair and equal treatment of all regions. This assessment was made for two statistical factors - the number of deaths and the number of vaccinations, whose distribution in the country was assessed according to the Gini index. Findings: Just before the war broke out – in February 2021, indicators of efficient pandemic management in the regions were better for Ukraine than for Russia. Ukraine recovered from the pandemic faster. This is a rather unexpected result. The article justifies the historical background of the centuries-old social and political relations between Russia and Ukraine, also using the position of Poland in these relations. Research limitations/implications: The presented research, together with its methodology, can be repeated for any administrative structure (state, group of countries), regions, cities, etc. An obvious requirement for conducting such research is the availability of reliable data on deaths and vaccinations. Practical implications: The method can be used to assess the efficiency of pandemic management at any administrative level (states, regions, groups of cities, etc.). Originality/value: An important novelty and the result of the research is the discovery of the Ukrainian organizational advantage in the fight against the pandemic just before the outbreak of the war. Keywords: Ukraine's war with Russia, COVID-19, vaccinations, pandemic deaths, pandemic management. Category of the paper: Research paper.
就在战前,乌克兰防治这一流行病的情况正在改善
目的:本文的目的是比较两个冲突国家——俄罗斯和乌克兰的大流行管理效率。关于俄罗斯在许多社会和经济因素方面优于乌克兰的论点似乎是显而易见的。用逻辑定义的数据测量的现实与这一论点相矛盾。从战争开始的那一天起,统计数据的使用就停止了。设计/方法/方法:所审议的两个国家都被视为划分为区域(州)的行政结构。人们认为,中央当局区域管理的质量应在公平和平等对待所有区域的基础上加以评价。这一评估是根据两个统计因素——死亡人数和疫苗接种人数——进行的,疫苗接种人数在该国的分布是根据基尼系数进行评估的。调查结果:就在战争爆发之前,即2021年2月,乌克兰各地区有效管理大流行病的指标优于俄罗斯。乌克兰从疫情中恢复得更快。这是一个相当出乎意料的结果。文章论证了俄罗斯和乌克兰之间数百年的社会和政治关系的历史背景,并利用了波兰在这些关系中的立场。研究局限性/启示:本研究及其方法可适用于任何行政结构(州、国家集团)、地区、城市等。进行这类研究的一个明显要求是提供关于死亡和疫苗接种的可靠数据。实际影响:该方法可用于评估任何行政级别(州、地区、城市集团等)的大流行管理效率。独创性/价值:这项研究的一个重要的新颖之处和结果是,在战争爆发之前,发现了乌克兰在防治大流行病方面的组织优势。关键词:乌克兰与俄罗斯的战争,COVID-19,疫苗接种,大流行死亡,大流行管理论文类别:研究论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信