Examining the impact of Ground Control point quantity on the geometric accuracy of UAV photogrammetric products formed using Structure-from-Motion approach

Tehnika Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5937/tehnika2305535n
Ratko Nikolić, Nenad Brodić, Branko Božić
{"title":"Examining the impact of Ground Control point quantity on the geometric accuracy of UAV photogrammetric products formed using Structure-from-Motion approach","authors":"Ratko Nikolić, Nenad Brodić, Branko Božić","doi":"10.5937/tehnika2305535n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The positional and vertical accuracy of UAV aerial photogrammetry products generated using the Structure from Motion (SfM) approach depends on various factors, such as flight plan parameters, camera quality, camera calibration, the SfM algorithm used, and the georeferencing process. The influence of the quantity of Ground Control Points (GCPs) on the geometric quality of generated models and the stability of camera calibration parameters assessed through self-calibration in the block-aerotriangulation process was investigated in this study. Three software systems were used to process the collected UAV photogrammetry images: Pix4D Mapper, Agisoft Metashape, and Trimble Inpho UASMaster. Standard statistical quality assessments were employed to assess the accuracy of the block-aerotriangulation. The research findings indicate that augmenting the quantity of GCPs enhances model reliability and decreases the RMSE values of vertical deviation on the control points. The RMSE values of vertical deviation on the check points for all three used software systems converged to approximately twice the value of the average spatial resolution. Additionally, the RMSE values of positional deviation on check points converged to the value of the average spatial resolution.","PeriodicalId":22484,"journal":{"name":"Tehnika","volume":"2019 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tehnika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2305535n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The positional and vertical accuracy of UAV aerial photogrammetry products generated using the Structure from Motion (SfM) approach depends on various factors, such as flight plan parameters, camera quality, camera calibration, the SfM algorithm used, and the georeferencing process. The influence of the quantity of Ground Control Points (GCPs) on the geometric quality of generated models and the stability of camera calibration parameters assessed through self-calibration in the block-aerotriangulation process was investigated in this study. Three software systems were used to process the collected UAV photogrammetry images: Pix4D Mapper, Agisoft Metashape, and Trimble Inpho UASMaster. Standard statistical quality assessments were employed to assess the accuracy of the block-aerotriangulation. The research findings indicate that augmenting the quantity of GCPs enhances model reliability and decreases the RMSE values of vertical deviation on the control points. The RMSE values of vertical deviation on the check points for all three used software systems converged to approximately twice the value of the average spatial resolution. Additionally, the RMSE values of positional deviation on check points converged to the value of the average spatial resolution.
研究地面控制点数量对采用结构-运动法形成的无人机摄影测量产品几何精度的影响
使用运动结构(SfM)方法生成的无人机航空摄影测量产品的位置和垂直精度取决于各种因素,如飞行计划参数、相机质量、相机校准、使用的SfM算法和地理参考过程。研究了在分块航空三角测量过程中,地面控制点(gcp)的数量对生成模型几何质量和自定标相机标定参数稳定性的影响。采用Pix4D Mapper、Agisoft Metashape和Trimble Inpho UASMaster三种软件系统对采集到的无人机摄影测量图像进行处理。采用标准的统计质量评价来评价块航空三角剖分的精度。研究结果表明,增加gcp的数量可以提高模型的可靠性,降低控制点上垂直偏差的RMSE值。所有三种使用的软件系统的检查点上垂直偏差的RMSE值收敛到大约是平均空间分辨率值的两倍。此外,检查点位置偏差的RMSE值收敛于平均空间分辨率值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信