Comparative evaluation of regenerative potential of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical study

Saba Salem, Shivani Dhawan, Ena Sharma, Rajan Dhawan, Abhilasha Mukherjee, S M Sivaraman
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of regenerative potential of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical study","authors":"Saba Salem, Shivani Dhawan, Ena Sharma, Rajan Dhawan, Abhilasha Mukherjee, S M Sivaraman","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) being in liquid form keeps graft particles clumped together forming agglutinated steak of bone graft. It has been shown to contain more platelets and long-term deliverance of growth factors in comparison with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess regenerative potential of i-PRF and comparing it with PRF, along with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of intrabony alveolar defects. Materials and Method: Thirty defect sites in 15 patients with bilateral intrabony defects were assigned randomly into two groups (Group I (Control group)- DFDBA + PRF and Group II (Test group)-DFDBA + i-PRF). Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Linear bone growth (LBG) was recorded radiographically at baseline and 6 months. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test were used to assess intragroup comparison of clinical parameters. Paired t-test was used to assess intragroup comparison of the radiographic parameter. Unpaired t-test was used to assess intergroup variations in all the clinical as well as radiographic parameters. Results: Statistically significant PPD reduction ( P = 0.005) and RAL gain ( P = 0.003) were found in Group II than in Group I, and no significant difference was found in other parameters. Percentage LBG was higher in Group II than Group I but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: i-PRF with DFDBA showed more favorable results as compared to PRF with DFDBA in the management of intrabony periodontal defects.","PeriodicalId":18827,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_39_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) being in liquid form keeps graft particles clumped together forming agglutinated steak of bone graft. It has been shown to contain more platelets and long-term deliverance of growth factors in comparison with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess regenerative potential of i-PRF and comparing it with PRF, along with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of intrabony alveolar defects. Materials and Method: Thirty defect sites in 15 patients with bilateral intrabony defects were assigned randomly into two groups (Group I (Control group)- DFDBA + PRF and Group II (Test group)-DFDBA + i-PRF). Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Linear bone growth (LBG) was recorded radiographically at baseline and 6 months. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test were used to assess intragroup comparison of clinical parameters. Paired t-test was used to assess intragroup comparison of the radiographic parameter. Unpaired t-test was used to assess intergroup variations in all the clinical as well as radiographic parameters. Results: Statistically significant PPD reduction ( P = 0.005) and RAL gain ( P = 0.003) were found in Group II than in Group I, and no significant difference was found in other parameters. Percentage LBG was higher in Group II than Group I but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: i-PRF with DFDBA showed more favorable results as compared to PRF with DFDBA in the management of intrabony periodontal defects.
可注射富血小板纤维蛋白和富血小板纤维蛋白与脱矿冻干同种异体骨移植治疗骨内缺损再生潜能的比较研究:一项随机对照临床研究
背景:可注射的富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)以液体形式保持移植物颗粒聚集在一起形成骨移植的凝集牛排。与富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)相比,它已被证明含有更多的血小板和生长因子的长期递送。目的:本研究的目的是评估i-PRF的再生潜力,并将其与PRF以及脱矿冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)治疗骨内牙槽缺损进行比较。材料与方法:将15例双侧骨内缺损患者的30个缺损部位随机分为两组(I组(对照组)-DFDBA + PRF和II组(试验组)-DFDBA + I -PRF)。分别在基线、3个月和6个月记录牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙袋探测深度(PPD)和相对附着水平(RAL)。基线和6个月时用x线摄影记录线性骨生长(LBG)。统计学分析:采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验评价组内临床参数比较。采用配对t检验评价组内影像学参数的比较。未配对t检验用于评估所有临床和影像学参数的组间差异。结果:与ⅰ组相比,ⅱ组PPD降低(P = 0.005)、RAL增加(P = 0.003)有统计学意义,其他参数差异无统计学意义。LBG百分比II组高于I组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:i-PRF联合DFDBA治疗骨内牙周缺损效果优于PRF联合DFDBA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信