COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT PLATE TYPES IN THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS PLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF DISTAL TIBIA FRACTURES

Q4 Medicine
Nebojsha Nastov, Labinot Bekteshi, Risto Todorov, Pavlina Aleksova, Elizabeta Stojovska Jovanovska
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT PLATE TYPES IN THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS PLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF DISTAL TIBIA FRACTURES","authors":"Nebojsha Nastov, Labinot Bekteshi, Risto Todorov, Pavlina Aleksova, Elizabeta Stojovska Jovanovska","doi":"10.55302/jms236201n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distal tibia fractures present a unique challenge for the surgeon due to the subcutaneous position of the tibia with a thin soft tissue envelope. The development of the technique for minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) is a well-accepted step towards this direction. In our study we explore the benefits and shortcomings of two different plate types used with this technique: the 3.5 mm anatomically pre-shaped titanium plate, and the 4.5 mm LC-DCP. The study was a prospective – retrospective clinical intervention case control study of 100 patients with closed, unstable, extraarticular and partially articular fractures of the distal tibia and fibula, classified as AO type 43A1, 43A2 and 43А3. Patients were divided in two groups of 50 patients. Group A were patients prospectively treated with a 3.5 mm pre-shaped plate, and Group B were patients with retrospectively collected data treated with a 4.5 mm LC-DCP. Patietns age was 38.15 years with 68 male and 32 female patients. Operation duration in Group A was 57.14 ± 8.30 and 66.67 ± 5.55, in Group B which was statistically significant. Partial and full weight bearing, as well as time to union in both groups was achieved within a similar timeframe. Functional according to Johner and Wruh's criteria and showed that most patients in both groups (61) had excellent results (Group A: 32, Group B: 29) and 21 had good results (Group A: 10, Group B:11). Rate of complications were comparable between the two groups, in regard to superficial infection, deep infection and ankle stiffness. Only complication parameter which showed a significant difference between the two groups was rate of implant irritation, which was higher in the 4.5 mm LC-DCP group. Both 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm plates are reliable when used with a MIPPO technique. This method is minimally invasive, preserves the periosteal blood supply and ensures optimal conditions for biological repair of distal tibia fractures, regardless of the type of plate used. Keywords:  Distal tibia fractures, MIPPO, Distal Tibia LC-LCP, LC-DCP, AO-classification. &nbsp","PeriodicalId":16444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Morphological Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Morphological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55302/jms236201n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distal tibia fractures present a unique challenge for the surgeon due to the subcutaneous position of the tibia with a thin soft tissue envelope. The development of the technique for minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) is a well-accepted step towards this direction. In our study we explore the benefits and shortcomings of two different plate types used with this technique: the 3.5 mm anatomically pre-shaped titanium plate, and the 4.5 mm LC-DCP. The study was a prospective – retrospective clinical intervention case control study of 100 patients with closed, unstable, extraarticular and partially articular fractures of the distal tibia and fibula, classified as AO type 43A1, 43A2 and 43А3. Patients were divided in two groups of 50 patients. Group A were patients prospectively treated with a 3.5 mm pre-shaped plate, and Group B were patients with retrospectively collected data treated with a 4.5 mm LC-DCP. Patietns age was 38.15 years with 68 male and 32 female patients. Operation duration in Group A was 57.14 ± 8.30 and 66.67 ± 5.55, in Group B which was statistically significant. Partial and full weight bearing, as well as time to union in both groups was achieved within a similar timeframe. Functional according to Johner and Wruh's criteria and showed that most patients in both groups (61) had excellent results (Group A: 32, Group B: 29) and 21 had good results (Group A: 10, Group B:11). Rate of complications were comparable between the two groups, in regard to superficial infection, deep infection and ankle stiffness. Only complication parameter which showed a significant difference between the two groups was rate of implant irritation, which was higher in the 4.5 mm LC-DCP group. Both 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm plates are reliable when used with a MIPPO technique. This method is minimally invasive, preserves the periosteal blood supply and ensures optimal conditions for biological repair of distal tibia fractures, regardless of the type of plate used. Keywords:  Distal tibia fractures, MIPPO, Distal Tibia LC-LCP, LC-DCP, AO-classification.  
两种不同类型钢板在胫骨远端骨折微创经皮钢板内固定中的比较
胫骨远端骨折对外科医生来说是一个独特的挑战,因为胫骨的皮下位置有薄的软组织包膜。微创经皮钢板接骨术(MIPPO)技术的发展是朝着这个方向迈出的公认的一步。在我们的研究中,我们探讨了用于该技术的两种不同类型的钢板的优点和缺点:3.5 mm解剖预成型钛板和4.5 mm LC-DCP。本研究是对100例胫骨腓骨远端闭合性、不稳定性、关节外及部分关节骨折患者进行前瞻性-回顾性临床干预病例对照研究,分类为AO型43A1、43A2、43А3。患者分为两组,每组50例。A组为前瞻性采用3.5 mm预成型钢板治疗的患者,B组为回顾性收集资料采用4.5 mm LC-DCP治疗的患者。患者年龄38.15岁,男68例,女32例。A组手术时间为57.14±8.30,B组为66.67±5.55,差异有统计学意义。两组患者的部分和全部负重以及愈合时间均在相似的时间框架内完成。功能根据Johner和Wruh的标准,显示两组大多数患者(61例)均有良好的结果(A组:32例,B组:29例),21例有良好的结果(A组:10例,B组:11例)。两组在浅表感染、深部感染和踝关节僵硬方面的并发症发生率相当。两组间唯一有显著差异的并发症参数是种植体刺激率,4.5 mm LC-DCP组的刺激率更高。当与MIPPO技术一起使用时,3.5 mm和4.5 mm板都是可靠的。该方法微创,保留骨膜血液供应,确保胫骨远端骨折生物修复的最佳条件,无论使用何种类型的钢板。关键词:,胫骨远端骨折,MIPPO,胫骨远端LC-LCP, LC-DCP, ao -分类。今天早上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信