Protecting the Last Wild River in Europe from Hydropower Development in Albania: An Environmental Movement Strategy in a Flawed Democracy

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christian Puecker, Tamara Steger
{"title":"Protecting the Last Wild River in Europe from Hydropower Development in Albania: <i>An Environmental Movement Strategy in a Flawed Democracy</i>","authors":"Christian Puecker, Tamara Steger","doi":"10.1525/cse.2023.2018088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, as anti-hydropower plant protests in Albania intensified, an initiative to protect rivers in the Balkans known as “Save the Blue Heart of Europe” launched the Vjosa River Campaign in Albania to save what is known as the “Last Wild River in Europe.” The Campaign’s main goals consisted of preventing the construction of hydropower plants and turning the Vjosa into Europe’s first “Wild River National Park,” a status that would severely limit future development. But, this Campaign would not be easy. Albania is a highly centralized, fragile democracy with a long history of political oppression and economic struggle whose top-down government is still generally inaccessible to public interest groups or influence. The country relies entirely on hydropower for its electricity production, leading to high uncertainties in energy security, especially in face of increasing periods of drought. The Campaign organizers and activists would have to strategize carefully and creatively to navigate the Albanian political landscape to reach its goals. What did they do? What worked or didn’t work along the way? Finally, would hydropower, considered a renewable energy source with low carbon emissions, enhance the country’s energy security? Or, would hydropower development on the Vjosa just not be worth it as a national and cultural treasure is destroyed alongside local livelihoods related to fisheries, agriculture, and tourism? Upon reading this case study, readers will learn about how environmental campaign organizers and activists mobilize in the face of the complexities of hydropower development in Albania, a struggling democracy.","PeriodicalId":42507,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in the Environment","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2023.2018088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2014, as anti-hydropower plant protests in Albania intensified, an initiative to protect rivers in the Balkans known as “Save the Blue Heart of Europe” launched the Vjosa River Campaign in Albania to save what is known as the “Last Wild River in Europe.” The Campaign’s main goals consisted of preventing the construction of hydropower plants and turning the Vjosa into Europe’s first “Wild River National Park,” a status that would severely limit future development. But, this Campaign would not be easy. Albania is a highly centralized, fragile democracy with a long history of political oppression and economic struggle whose top-down government is still generally inaccessible to public interest groups or influence. The country relies entirely on hydropower for its electricity production, leading to high uncertainties in energy security, especially in face of increasing periods of drought. The Campaign organizers and activists would have to strategize carefully and creatively to navigate the Albanian political landscape to reach its goals. What did they do? What worked or didn’t work along the way? Finally, would hydropower, considered a renewable energy source with low carbon emissions, enhance the country’s energy security? Or, would hydropower development on the Vjosa just not be worth it as a national and cultural treasure is destroyed alongside local livelihoods related to fisheries, agriculture, and tourism? Upon reading this case study, readers will learn about how environmental campaign organizers and activists mobilize in the face of the complexities of hydropower development in Albania, a struggling democracy.
保护欧洲最后一条野生河流不受阿尔巴尼亚水电开发的影响:一个有缺陷的民主国家的环境运动战略
2014年,随着阿尔巴尼亚反对水电站的抗议活动愈演愈烈,一项名为“拯救欧洲蓝色心脏”的保护巴尔干地区河流的倡议在阿尔巴尼亚发起了“Vjosa河运动”,以拯救被称为“欧洲最后一条野性河流”的Vjosa河。该运动的主要目标包括阻止水力发电厂的建设,并将Vjosa变成欧洲第一个“野河国家公园”,这将严重限制未来的发展。但是,这场运动并不容易。阿尔巴尼亚是一个高度集中、脆弱的民主国家,有着长期的政治压迫和经济斗争历史,其自上而下的政府通常仍然无法进入公共利益集团或影响。该国完全依靠水力发电,导致能源安全的高度不确定性,特别是在面临干旱时期增加的情况下。竞选活动的组织者和积极分子必须谨慎和创造性地制定战略,驾驭阿尔巴尼亚的政治格局,以实现其目标。他们做了什么?在这一过程中,哪些是成功的,哪些是失败的?最后,被认为是低碳排放的可再生能源的水电,能否增强国家的能源安全?或者,在Vjosa河上开发水力发电是否不值得,因为国家和文化瑰宝将被摧毁,与渔业、农业和旅游业相关的当地生计也将受到破坏?通过阅读这个案例研究,读者将了解环境运动组织者和活动家如何在阿尔巴尼亚这个挣扎中的民主国家面对水电开发的复杂性时动员起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信