Comparative Alpha Tracks Counting Using an Optical Microscope and a Spark Counter

Dabo S. I. Agba, Ponaho Kezo, Issa Konaté
{"title":"Comparative Alpha Tracks Counting Using an Optical Microscope and a Spark Counter","authors":"Dabo S. I. Agba, Ponaho Kezo, Issa Konaté","doi":"10.4236/detection.2023.102002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the metrology of radon, an environmental lung carcinogen, the integrated measurements necessary for epidemiological studies are made very often using the tracks detector LR 115 type 2. For dosimetric analysis, the etched tracks from radon alpha particles on this detector are usually counted by means of an optical microscope or a spark counter. An optimal reading of the track densities which must be converted into radon concentrations, can’t be done without a good mastery of the mode of operation and use of these devices. Furthermore, investigations to know as to whether or not each of those can be used to determine radon concentration are necessary. These are the objectives of the present work in which LR 115 samples exposed to radon for at least 3 months, were chemically developed under standard conditions and read. The track densities obtained with the microscope are very much higher than those of the counter for each sample. These results are consistent with those published by other authors. However, each of these devices can be used interchangeably for alpha tracks counting, as both provide radon concentrations with a very good linear correlation coefficient of 0.95 taking into account their respective calibration factors for the reading of this detector. In addition, the saturation phenomenon for the spark counter reading of LR 115 detector occurs beyond 11,000 tr/cm2, a density never reached during our environmental radon measurements.","PeriodicalId":68695,"journal":{"name":"检测(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"检测(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/detection.2023.102002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the metrology of radon, an environmental lung carcinogen, the integrated measurements necessary for epidemiological studies are made very often using the tracks detector LR 115 type 2. For dosimetric analysis, the etched tracks from radon alpha particles on this detector are usually counted by means of an optical microscope or a spark counter. An optimal reading of the track densities which must be converted into radon concentrations, can’t be done without a good mastery of the mode of operation and use of these devices. Furthermore, investigations to know as to whether or not each of those can be used to determine radon concentration are necessary. These are the objectives of the present work in which LR 115 samples exposed to radon for at least 3 months, were chemically developed under standard conditions and read. The track densities obtained with the microscope are very much higher than those of the counter for each sample. These results are consistent with those published by other authors. However, each of these devices can be used interchangeably for alpha tracks counting, as both provide radon concentrations with a very good linear correlation coefficient of 0.95 taking into account their respective calibration factors for the reading of this detector. In addition, the saturation phenomenon for the spark counter reading of LR 115 detector occurs beyond 11,000 tr/cm2, a density never reached during our environmental radon measurements.
使用光学显微镜和火花计数器的比较α轨道计数
氡是一种环境致癌物,在氡的计量学中,流行病学研究所需的综合测量经常使用lr115型2型轨道探测器。在剂量学分析中,通常使用光学显微镜或火花计数器对探测器上氡α粒子的蚀刻轨迹进行计数。如果不能很好地掌握这些装置的操作模式和使用方法,就无法获得轨道密度的最佳读数,而轨道密度必须转化为氡浓度。此外,有必要进行调查,以了解这些方法是否可以用来确定氡浓度。这些是目前工作的目标,ll115样品暴露于氡至少3个月,在标准条件下进行化学显影并读取。显微镜得到的迹线密度比每个样品的计数器的迹线密度高得多。这些结果与其他作者发表的结果一致。然而,这些设备中的每一个都可以互换用于α轨道计数,因为考虑到该探测器读数的各自校准因素,两者都提供了非常好的线性相关系数0.95的氡浓度。此外,lr115探测器的火花计数器读数的饱和现象发生在11,000 tr/cm2以上,这是我们在环境氡测量中从未达到的密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信