Impact of new professional profiles of the sports kinesiologist, preventive and adapted motor activities kinesiologist and of sports manager in the current university education

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Gaetano Altavilla
{"title":"Impact of new professional profiles of the sports kinesiologist, preventive and adapted motor activities kinesiologist and of sports manager in the current university education","authors":"Gaetano Altavilla","doi":"10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to understand the impact that this reform has had on sport sciences masterly students in Italy, in terms of perceptions and opinions, and what kind of feedback it has had in their university education, in terms of coherence. Methods: The sample represents 288 sport sciences masterly students divided into sports kinesiologist (N=162) mean age of 25.7 (± 5.7); kinesiologist of preventive and adapted physical activities (N=66) mean age of 27.3 (± 7.1); sports manager (N=60) mean age of 27.4 (± 9.3). A questionnaire submitted through Google Forms and sent to masterly students of the University of Salento and Salerno was used. The data (age, gender, university provenance and current study path) were presented as means and standard deviations, while the percentage frequency of responses was reported for each item, using the chi-squared test. The level of significance was set with P <.05. Results: The knowledge of the sport reform and the impact of the sport reform among the 3 masterly classes gave a not statistically significant result (P=.30; P=.63). The perceptions of job opportunities and strengths offered by this reform, for each of the professional figures, gave a significant result (P=.0001; P=.0001). The coherence of one’s university education with the respective professional profile was found to be significant (P=.0001; P=.01). Conclusions: The knowledge of the sport reform is homogeneous in the 3 masterly classes analysed. Regarding perceptions on job opportunities, sports kinesiologist (LM68) and preventive and adapted physical activities kinesiologist (LM67) courses are affected by the spaces already occupied by sports federations and health figures; while sports manager (LM47) showed some confidence in the new opportunities that this profile offers. Finally, some reflections emerged regarding the need to have a university education more coherence with the professional profile. Keywords: reform, physical education, professional profiles, perspectives.","PeriodicalId":42772,"journal":{"name":"Acta Kinesiologica","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Kinesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to understand the impact that this reform has had on sport sciences masterly students in Italy, in terms of perceptions and opinions, and what kind of feedback it has had in their university education, in terms of coherence. Methods: The sample represents 288 sport sciences masterly students divided into sports kinesiologist (N=162) mean age of 25.7 (± 5.7); kinesiologist of preventive and adapted physical activities (N=66) mean age of 27.3 (± 7.1); sports manager (N=60) mean age of 27.4 (± 9.3). A questionnaire submitted through Google Forms and sent to masterly students of the University of Salento and Salerno was used. The data (age, gender, university provenance and current study path) were presented as means and standard deviations, while the percentage frequency of responses was reported for each item, using the chi-squared test. The level of significance was set with P <.05. Results: The knowledge of the sport reform and the impact of the sport reform among the 3 masterly classes gave a not statistically significant result (P=.30; P=.63). The perceptions of job opportunities and strengths offered by this reform, for each of the professional figures, gave a significant result (P=.0001; P=.0001). The coherence of one’s university education with the respective professional profile was found to be significant (P=.0001; P=.01). Conclusions: The knowledge of the sport reform is homogeneous in the 3 masterly classes analysed. Regarding perceptions on job opportunities, sports kinesiologist (LM68) and preventive and adapted physical activities kinesiologist (LM67) courses are affected by the spaces already occupied by sports federations and health figures; while sports manager (LM47) showed some confidence in the new opportunities that this profile offers. Finally, some reflections emerged regarding the need to have a university education more coherence with the professional profile. Keywords: reform, physical education, professional profiles, perspectives.
运动运动学学家、预防和适应性运动运动运动学学家和运动管理人员新专业概况在当前大学教育中的影响
目的:本研究旨在了解这项改革对意大利体育科学专业学生的影响,从观念和观点的角度来看,以及在连贯性方面,它对他们的大学教育产生了什么样的反馈。方法:样本288名体育科学专业学生分为运动运动学专业学生(N=162),平均年龄25.7(±5.7)岁;预防性和适应性体育活动运动学专家(N=66),平均年龄27.3(±7.1)岁;体育经理(N=60)平均年龄27.4(±9.3)岁。问卷通过谷歌Forms提交,并发送给Salento大学和Salerno大学的优秀学生。数据(年龄、性别、大学来源和目前的学习路径)以均值和标准差表示,而使用卡方检验报告了每个项目的回答频率百分比。显著性水平为P < 0.05。结果:3个优等生班对体育改革的了解程度和对体育改革的影响程度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P= 0.30;P =点)。对于每个专业人士来说,这项改革所提供的工作机会和优势的看法产生了显著的结果(P= 0.0001;P =。)。一个人的大学教育与各自的专业概况的一致性被发现是显著的(P= 0.0001;P = . 01)。结论:所分析的3个技能班学生对体育改革的认识是同质化的。关于对就业机会的看法,运动运动学家(LM68)和预防和适应体育活动运动学家(LM67)课程受到体育联合会和卫生人员已经占据的空间的影响;而体育经理(LM47)对这个档案提供的新机会表现出一些信心。最后,出现了一些关于需要使大学教育更符合专业概况的思考。关键词:改革;体育;专业概况;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Kinesiologica
Acta Kinesiologica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信