Ahmad Fahmi Hidayatullah, Nasuka Nasuka, Agung Wahyudi
{"title":"The Effect of Training Method and Arm Length on Spike Back Attack Ability in Junior Athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang Volleyball Club","authors":"Ahmad Fahmi Hidayatullah, Nasuka Nasuka, Agung Wahyudi","doi":"10.33222/juara.v8i2.3379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the effect of hanging ball training methods and self-throwing ball training methods, above-average arm length and below-average arm length, and whether there is an interaction between training methods and arm length on the ability of spike back attacks in junior volleyball athletes. This study used an experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The population in this study was 25 junior athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang volleyball club. The sample of this study was 20 athletes taken by purposive sampling technique. The instruments in this study used an anthropometer and a Robert E Laveaga spike test. Data analysis in this study used the ANOVA test (two-way) followed by the Tukey test with a significant level of α = 0.05. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There is a difference in the effect between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 9.308 with a significance of 0.008. (2) There is a difference in arm length (above average and below average) on the ability to spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024. (3) There is an interaction between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) and arm length (above average and below average) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024.","PeriodicalId":33618,"journal":{"name":"Juara","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v8i2.3379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the effect of hanging ball training methods and self-throwing ball training methods, above-average arm length and below-average arm length, and whether there is an interaction between training methods and arm length on the ability of spike back attacks in junior volleyball athletes. This study used an experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The population in this study was 25 junior athletes of Bina Taruna Semarang volleyball club. The sample of this study was 20 athletes taken by purposive sampling technique. The instruments in this study used an anthropometer and a Robert E Laveaga spike test. Data analysis in this study used the ANOVA test (two-way) followed by the Tukey test with a significant level of α = 0.05. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There is a difference in the effect between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 9.308 with a significance of 0.008. (2) There is a difference in arm length (above average and below average) on the ability to spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024. (3) There is an interaction between the training method (hanging ball and self-throwing ball) and arm length (above average and below average) on the ability of spike back attack, as evidenced by the calculated F value of 6.231 with a significance of 0.024.
本研究旨在分析吊球训练方式与自抛球训练方式、臂长高于平均水平与臂长低于平均水平对青少年排球运动员扣球反攻能力的影响差异,以及训练方式与臂长之间是否存在交互作用。本研究采用2x2因子设计的实验方法。本研究的人群为比那塔鲁纳三宝垄排球俱乐部的25名青少年运动员。本研究以20名运动员为样本,采用目的抽样法。这项研究使用的仪器是人体测量仪和Robert E Laveaga刺突测试。本研究的数据分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验(双向),然后采用Tukey检验,显著水平为α = 0.05。研究结果表明:(1)吊球与自投两种训练方式对扣球反攻能力的影响存在差异,计算F值为9.308,显著性为0.008。(2)臂长对扣球反攻能力有高于平均水平和低于平均水平的差异,计算出的F值为6.231,显著性为0.024。(3)训练方式(吊球和自投球)与臂长(高于平均水平和低于平均水平)对扣球反攻能力有交互作用,计算出的F值为6.231,显著性为0.024。