CRIMINAL GROUPS – CRIMINOLOGY AND SECURITY PERSPECTIVES (CASE STUDY: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA)

Teme Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.22190/teme220516010s
Mile Šikman, Velibor Lalić
{"title":"CRIMINAL GROUPS – CRIMINOLOGY AND SECURITY PERSPECTIVES (CASE STUDY: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA)","authors":"Mile Šikman, Velibor Lalić","doi":"10.22190/teme220516010s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses court cases which qualified as organised crime in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The final judgments were analysed according to the following criteria: the number of defendants; the continuity of membership within the crime organisation; the existence of criminal structure; the existence of a developed plan of activities; the type and number of the offences committed; influence on public authorities, the judiciary, and citizens; and sentences imposed on the defendants. This paper seeks to identify the extent to which court judgments are based on these criteria. A secondary analysis of the data related to the organised crime cases heard in the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period between 2015 and 2018 was conducted. This analysis encompassed 21 organised crime cases in which 27 judgments were pronounced. In the observed period (2015-2018), we identified two organised criminal groups that meet the criteria analysed. The identified number of organised criminal groups is minimal in relation to the total number of organised crime cases processed. Our findings contradict the prevailing view in public discourse that organised crime is a widespread security threat in BiH. The findings of our research demonstrated the existence of legal gaps, reflected in the lack of clear criteria on the basis of which OCGs can be distinguish from other forms of criminal activity. Legal and institutional weaknesses create opportunities for OCGs to operate and create a sense of insecurity among citizens in the already complex security environment in B&H.","PeriodicalId":31832,"journal":{"name":"Teme","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/teme220516010s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses court cases which qualified as organised crime in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The final judgments were analysed according to the following criteria: the number of defendants; the continuity of membership within the crime organisation; the existence of criminal structure; the existence of a developed plan of activities; the type and number of the offences committed; influence on public authorities, the judiciary, and citizens; and sentences imposed on the defendants. This paper seeks to identify the extent to which court judgments are based on these criteria. A secondary analysis of the data related to the organised crime cases heard in the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period between 2015 and 2018 was conducted. This analysis encompassed 21 organised crime cases in which 27 judgments were pronounced. In the observed period (2015-2018), we identified two organised criminal groups that meet the criteria analysed. The identified number of organised criminal groups is minimal in relation to the total number of organised crime cases processed. Our findings contradict the prevailing view in public discourse that organised crime is a widespread security threat in BiH. The findings of our research demonstrated the existence of legal gaps, reflected in the lack of clear criteria on the basis of which OCGs can be distinguish from other forms of criminal activity. Legal and institutional weaknesses create opportunities for OCGs to operate and create a sense of insecurity among citizens in the already complex security environment in B&H.
犯罪集团-犯罪学和安全观点(案例研究:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那)
本文分析了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(B&H)有组织犯罪的法庭案件。根据以下标准对最终判决进行分析:被告人数;犯罪组织内成员的连续性;犯罪结构的存在;活动计划:存在一个成熟的活动计划;所犯罪行的种类和数目;对公共当局、司法机构和公民的影响;以及对被告的判决。本文试图确定法院判决在多大程度上是基于这些标准的。对2015年至2018年期间在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那法院审理的有组织犯罪案件的相关数据进行了二次分析。该分析包括21起有组织犯罪案件,其中27起判决已宣布。在观察期间(2015-2018年),我们确定了两个符合分析标准的有组织犯罪集团。与已处理的有组织犯罪案件总数相比,已查明的有组织犯罪集团数目极少。我们的研究结果与公共话语中普遍存在的有组织犯罪是波黑普遍存在的安全威胁的观点相矛盾。我们的研究结果表明,存在法律空白,这反映在缺乏明确的标准,可以根据该标准将非政府组织犯罪与其他形式的犯罪活动区分开来。法律和制度上的弱点为ocg的运作创造了机会,并在B&H已经复杂的安全环境中给公民带来了不安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信