Food oppression in the United Kingdom: A study of structural race and income-based food access inequalities

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Katie Morris
{"title":"Food oppression in the United Kingdom: A study of structural race and income-based food access inequalities","authors":"Katie Morris","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2259423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2007, Freeman pioneered the phrase “food oppression” to capture the state’s perpetuation of socioeconomic and racial disparities in nutrient consumption and diet-related diseases in the United States. Amid an increasing awareness of the impact of intersecting identities in all facets of life, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter movement, this article argues that food oppression is an equally applicable, and necessary, characterization of the unequal enjoyment of the right to food in the United Kingdom. Patterns of food insecurity—chiefly, the overrepresentation of Black households among food bank users—are tied back to the austerity measures enacted by the Conservative–Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in response to the 2007/2008 financial crisis. These findings illuminate the race- and class-based barriers to access to adequate food in the United Kingdom that predate the pandemic as a manifestation of racial capitalism yet have increased in prominence. The article concludes that the adoption of a rights-based approach to household food security by the state is necessary to formulate policies that target the commodification of food and ensure a nutritious diet is available to all without discrimination.","PeriodicalId":51734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2023.2259423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2007, Freeman pioneered the phrase “food oppression” to capture the state’s perpetuation of socioeconomic and racial disparities in nutrient consumption and diet-related diseases in the United States. Amid an increasing awareness of the impact of intersecting identities in all facets of life, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter movement, this article argues that food oppression is an equally applicable, and necessary, characterization of the unequal enjoyment of the right to food in the United Kingdom. Patterns of food insecurity—chiefly, the overrepresentation of Black households among food bank users—are tied back to the austerity measures enacted by the Conservative–Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in response to the 2007/2008 financial crisis. These findings illuminate the race- and class-based barriers to access to adequate food in the United Kingdom that predate the pandemic as a manifestation of racial capitalism yet have increased in prominence. The article concludes that the adoption of a rights-based approach to household food security by the state is necessary to formulate policies that target the commodification of food and ensure a nutritious diet is available to all without discrimination.
食物压迫在英国:结构性种族和收入为基础的食物获取不平等的研究
2007年,弗里曼率先提出了“食物压迫”一词,以描述美国在营养消费和饮食相关疾病方面长期存在的社会经济和种族差异。随着人们越来越意识到身份交叉对生活各个方面的影响,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行和“黑人的生命也重要”运动的背景下,本文认为,在联合王国,食物压迫同样适用,也是对食物权享受不平等的必要描述。食品不安全的模式——主要是食品银行用户中黑人家庭的比例过高——与保守党-自由民主党联合政府为应对2007/2008年金融危机而制定的紧缩措施有关。这些发现说明,在大流行之前,作为种族资本主义的一种表现,在英国,以种族和阶级为基础的获得充足食物的障碍日益突出。文章的结论是,国家必须采取基于权利的家庭粮食安全方法,以制定针对粮食商品化的政策,并确保所有人都能不受歧视地获得营养饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信