Student fitness to practice procedures on accredited and regulatory programmes: a narrative review of the literature

Q2 Social Sciences
Jo Finch, Sarah Corrie
{"title":"Student fitness to practice procedures on accredited and regulatory programmes: a narrative review of the literature","authors":"Jo Finch, Sarah Corrie","doi":"10.1080/25783858.2023.2265291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical task for university based professional training programmes is ensuring that students are fit to practice. Yet, in comparison with other aspects of professional training such as curriculum development or assessment, the literature on fitness to practice procedures remains sparse. This article reports the findings of a preliminary, narrative review of the literature which aimed firstly to identify what research has been undertaken in the area of fitness to practice within university settings, and secondly, to explore the experiences of university staff who are involved. Eight themes were identified from the literature: the impact on individuals, criteria for referral, fitness to practice processes, analysis of fitness to practice outcomes, factors affecting outcomes, the emotional toil in failing students, racially minoritised students and criticisms of fitness to practice procedures. It was noteworthy that the review did not locate studies which directly explored the experiences of university staff who initiate, investigate or participate in fitness to practice procedures. This omission is important to address in order to ensure universities have effective procedures and that staff receive appropriate support. Recommendations are made for future research in this area.","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2023.2265291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical task for university based professional training programmes is ensuring that students are fit to practice. Yet, in comparison with other aspects of professional training such as curriculum development or assessment, the literature on fitness to practice procedures remains sparse. This article reports the findings of a preliminary, narrative review of the literature which aimed firstly to identify what research has been undertaken in the area of fitness to practice within university settings, and secondly, to explore the experiences of university staff who are involved. Eight themes were identified from the literature: the impact on individuals, criteria for referral, fitness to practice processes, analysis of fitness to practice outcomes, factors affecting outcomes, the emotional toil in failing students, racially minoritised students and criticisms of fitness to practice procedures. It was noteworthy that the review did not locate studies which directly explored the experiences of university staff who initiate, investigate or participate in fitness to practice procedures. This omission is important to address in order to ensure universities have effective procedures and that staff receive appropriate support. Recommendations are made for future research in this area.
学生适合实践程序的认可和监管程序:文献的叙述回顾
大学专业培训项目的一项关键任务是确保学生适合实践。然而,与课程开发或评估等专业培训的其他方面相比,关于实践程序适应性的文献仍然很少。本文报告了对文献的初步叙述回顾的结果,其目的首先是确定在大学环境中健身实践领域进行了哪些研究,其次是探索参与其中的大学工作人员的经验。从文献中确定了八个主题:对个人的影响,转诊标准,实践过程的适应性,实践结果的适应性分析,影响结果的因素,失败学生的情感辛劳,少数民族学生和对实践过程适应性的批评。值得注意的是,该审查没有找到直接探讨发起、调查或参与健身实践程序的大学工作人员经验的研究。为了确保大学有有效的程序,员工得到适当的支持,解决这一遗漏是很重要的。对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practice
Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信