UK-wide survey of gastroenterology and hepatology trainees in 2022: endoscopy, workforce planning and the Shape of things to come

IF 2.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Emma Saunsbury, Yazan Haddadin, Radha Gadhok, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Suneil A Raju
{"title":"UK-wide survey of gastroenterology and hepatology trainees in 2022: endoscopy, workforce planning and the Shape of things to come","authors":"Emma Saunsbury, Yazan Haddadin, Radha Gadhok, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Suneil A Raju","doi":"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Shape of Training has shortened the gastroenterology curriculum in the UK from a 5 to 4-year programme. There are ongoing concerns that this will negatively impact training and the attainment of competencies expected at consultant level. We undertook a UK-wide survey of gastroenterology trainees to establish their views. Method The British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees Section collected anonymised survey responses from trainees between June and September 2022 via an online platform. Results 40.3% of trainees responded. Strikingly, only 10% of respondents felt they could achieve certificate of completion of training (CCT) within a 4-year programme. Furthermore, 31% were not confident they would attain the required expertise in their subspecialist interest during training. 70.8% reported spending a quarter or more of their training in general internal medicine (GIM) and 71.6% felt this negatively impacted on their gastroenterology training. Only 21.6% of respondents plan to pursue a consultant post with GIM commitments. Regarding endoscopy, only 36.1% of ST7s had provisional and 22.2% full accreditation in colonoscopy. Although 92.3% of respondents wanted exposure to a ‘bleed rota’, this was the case for only 16.2%. Teaching quality was judged to be insufficient by 45.9% of respondents. Conclusion Respondents had struggled to achieve the necessary competencies for CCT even prior to the newly reduced 4-year curriculum. While still maintaining service provision, we must safeguard gastroenterology training from encroaching GIM commitments. This will be critical in order to provide capable consultants of the future and prevent UK standards from falling behind internationally.","PeriodicalId":46937,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Shape of Training has shortened the gastroenterology curriculum in the UK from a 5 to 4-year programme. There are ongoing concerns that this will negatively impact training and the attainment of competencies expected at consultant level. We undertook a UK-wide survey of gastroenterology trainees to establish their views. Method The British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees Section collected anonymised survey responses from trainees between June and September 2022 via an online platform. Results 40.3% of trainees responded. Strikingly, only 10% of respondents felt they could achieve certificate of completion of training (CCT) within a 4-year programme. Furthermore, 31% were not confident they would attain the required expertise in their subspecialist interest during training. 70.8% reported spending a quarter or more of their training in general internal medicine (GIM) and 71.6% felt this negatively impacted on their gastroenterology training. Only 21.6% of respondents plan to pursue a consultant post with GIM commitments. Regarding endoscopy, only 36.1% of ST7s had provisional and 22.2% full accreditation in colonoscopy. Although 92.3% of respondents wanted exposure to a ‘bleed rota’, this was the case for only 16.2%. Teaching quality was judged to be insufficient by 45.9% of respondents. Conclusion Respondents had struggled to achieve the necessary competencies for CCT even prior to the newly reduced 4-year curriculum. While still maintaining service provision, we must safeguard gastroenterology training from encroaching GIM commitments. This will be critical in order to provide capable consultants of the future and prevent UK standards from falling behind internationally.
2022年全英国胃肠病学和肝病学培训生调查:内窥镜检查、劳动力规划和未来发展趋势
目的:Shape of Training将英国的胃肠病学课程从5年缩短为4年。目前有人担心,这将对培训和达到顾问一级预期的能力产生不利影响。我们在全英国范围内对胃肠病学学员进行了调查,以确定他们的观点。方法英国胃肠病学学会学员组通过在线平台收集了2022年6月至9月期间学员的匿名调查反馈。结果40.3%的学员有反馈。引人注目的是,只有10%的受访者认为他们可以在4年的课程中获得培训完成证书(CCT)。此外,31%的人不相信他们能在培训期间获得他们感兴趣的子专家所需的专业知识。70.8%的人表示,他们将四分之一或更多的时间用于普通内科(GIM)培训,71.6%的人认为这对他们的胃肠病学培训产生了负面影响。只有21.6%的受访者计划从事具有GIM承诺的顾问职位。在内窥镜方面,只有36.1%的st7获得结肠镜临时认证,22.2%的st7获得结肠镜完全认证。尽管92.3%的受访者希望接触到“流血轮班”,但只有16.2%的人这样做。45.9%的受访者认为教学质量不足。即使在新减少的4年课程之前,被调查者也努力达到CCT的必要能力。在继续提供服务的同时,我们必须保护胃肠病学培训不受GIM承诺的侵蚀。这将是至关重要的,以便为未来提供有能力的顾问,并防止英国标准落后于国际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontline Gastroenterology
Frontline Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles that accelerate adoption of innovative and best practice in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. Frontline Gastroenterology is especially interested in articles on multidisciplinary research and care, focusing on both retrospective assessments of novel models of care as well as putative future directions of best practice. Specifically Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles in the domains of clinical quality, patient experience, service provision and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信