Comparing city practitioners’ and residents’ perceptions of a liveable neighbourhood in Finland

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Maija Tiitu, Elina Nyberg, Jaana I. Halonen, Tytti P. Pasanen, Arto Viinikka, Jenni Lehtimäki, Timo Lanki, Kati Vierikko
{"title":"Comparing city practitioners’ and residents’ perceptions of a liveable neighbourhood in Finland","authors":"Maija Tiitu, Elina Nyberg, Jaana I. Halonen, Tytti P. Pasanen, Arto Viinikka, Jenni Lehtimäki, Timo Lanki, Kati Vierikko","doi":"10.1080/09654313.2023.2263053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planning sustainable and liveable communities requires considering residents’ perceptions and preferences. However, practitioners’ values and preferences can also determine the development of neighbourhoods, which has rarely been recognized. Thus, we compared if residents’ and practitioners’ perceptions match regarding 1) factors they considered valuable for neighbourhoods and 2) the development needs of specific neighbourhoods. We studied three Finnish suburbs using practitioner workshops and residential surveys. In general, the practitioners’ and residents’ values matched well. Both groups rated cleanliness, non-traffic related safety, essential services, and green spaces as the most important factors. However, residents valued traffic safety and lighting of routes more than practitioners. The practitioners and residents mostly agreed on how to develop the neighbourhoods in the future. The resident views not fully considered in the practitioners’ development objectives were noise disturbances, and infill development as a threat to green spaces. This study underlined the importance of considering safety and access to green spaces in planning and developing suburbs. The study also revealed the complexity of integrating different aspects of liveability on an individual and neighbourhood/city scale. The integration of different dimensions of liveability in planning may require the use of participatory planning-support tools.","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2263053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planning sustainable and liveable communities requires considering residents’ perceptions and preferences. However, practitioners’ values and preferences can also determine the development of neighbourhoods, which has rarely been recognized. Thus, we compared if residents’ and practitioners’ perceptions match regarding 1) factors they considered valuable for neighbourhoods and 2) the development needs of specific neighbourhoods. We studied three Finnish suburbs using practitioner workshops and residential surveys. In general, the practitioners’ and residents’ values matched well. Both groups rated cleanliness, non-traffic related safety, essential services, and green spaces as the most important factors. However, residents valued traffic safety and lighting of routes more than practitioners. The practitioners and residents mostly agreed on how to develop the neighbourhoods in the future. The resident views not fully considered in the practitioners’ development objectives were noise disturbances, and infill development as a threat to green spaces. This study underlined the importance of considering safety and access to green spaces in planning and developing suburbs. The study also revealed the complexity of integrating different aspects of liveability on an individual and neighbourhood/city scale. The integration of different dimensions of liveability in planning may require the use of participatory planning-support tools.
比较芬兰城市实践者和居民对宜居社区的看法
规划可持续和宜居的社区需要考虑居民的看法和偏好。然而,实践者的价值观和偏好也可以决定社区的发展,这一点很少被认识到。因此,我们比较了居民和从业人员在以下方面的看法是否一致:(1)他们认为对社区有价值的因素;(2)特定社区的发展需求。我们使用从业者工作坊和居民调查研究了三个芬兰郊区。总的来说,医生和居民的价值观匹配得很好。两组人都认为清洁、非交通相关的安全、基本服务和绿色空间是最重要的因素。然而,居民比从业人员更重视交通安全和道路照明。在社区未来如何发展的问题上,业界人士和居民的意见基本一致。在从业员的发展目标中,没有充分考虑到居民的意见,包括噪音干扰,以及对绿地的威胁。这项研究强调了在规划和发展郊区时考虑安全和获得绿色空间的重要性。该研究还揭示了在个人和社区/城市尺度上整合宜居性的不同方面的复杂性。将宜居性的不同方面纳入规划可能需要使用参与性规划支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信