Track Records: A Cautionary Tale

IF 3.2 1区哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1086/728459

Alice C.W. Huang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the literature on expert trust, it is often assumed that track records are the gold standard for evaluating expertise, and the di ffi culty of expert identification arises from either the lack of access to track records

查看原文本刊更多论文

业绩记录:一个警世故事

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science encourages the application of philosophical techniques to issues raised by the natural and human sciences. These include general questions of scientific knowledge and objectivity, as well as more particular problems arising within specific disciplines. Topics currently being discussed in the journal include: causation, the logic of natural selection, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, the direction of time, probability, confirmation, foundations of mathematics, supertasks and the theory of emotion.