How to Peer Review a Neurology Education Manuscript

Daniel G. Di Luca, Steven M. Lazar, Preeta Gupta, Marie Charmaine S. Lukban, Cole Crowson, Dara V.F. Albert, Jeremy J. Moeller, Andres Fernandez, Andrew M. Southerland, Zachary London
{"title":"How to Peer Review a Neurology Education Manuscript","authors":"Daniel G. Di Luca, Steven M. Lazar, Preeta Gupta, Marie Charmaine S. Lukban, Cole Crowson, Dara V.F. Albert, Jeremy J. Moeller, Andres Fernandez, Andrew M. Southerland, Zachary London","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and suitability of manuscripts for publication. Neurology education research differs from biomedical clinical research in several ways. These differences encompass specific paradigms, the use of theoretical frameworks, and different methodological approaches. Despite the high number of studies and journal publications on neurology education, there is a dearth of resources and guidance on how to perform a formal review on this specific literature. This article aims to review the distinctive features of neurology education from clinical research while proposing an organizational framework and model for performing peer reviews of papers focused on neurology education.","PeriodicalId":496615,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Education","volume":"31 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, ensuring the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and suitability of manuscripts for publication. Neurology education research differs from biomedical clinical research in several ways. These differences encompass specific paradigms, the use of theoretical frameworks, and different methodological approaches. Despite the high number of studies and journal publications on neurology education, there is a dearth of resources and guidance on how to perform a formal review on this specific literature. This article aims to review the distinctive features of neurology education from clinical research while proposing an organizational framework and model for performing peer reviews of papers focused on neurology education.
如何对神经学教育稿件进行同行评议
同行评议是科学研究的重要环节,可以保证论文发表的全面性、准确性和适用性。神经学教育研究与生物医学临床研究在几个方面有所不同。这些差异包括具体的范例、理论框架的使用和不同的方法方法。尽管有大量关于神经学教育的研究和期刊出版物,但缺乏关于如何对这一特定文献进行正式审查的资源和指导。本文旨在从临床研究的角度回顾神经病学教育的特点,并提出一种对神经病学教育论文进行同行评议的组织框架和模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信