Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Signs Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725833
Jienian Zhang
{"title":"Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity","authors":"Jienian Zhang","doi":"10.1086/725833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of colorblind racism has been central to understanding why racial inequalities persist in schools. However, I argue that merely increasing racial awareness through school policies, official and unofficial, does not alleviate educational racial inequalities. Ethnographic data from a progressive suburban high school reveal that some teachers’ responses to struggling marginalized students, in environments that promote racial equity, may be characterized as palliative schooling. Palliative schooling has two interrelated, core features: it prioritizes students’ immediate comfort as a form of caring, and it assumes a sense of hopelessness regarding what one can do to improve students’ situations. In this high school, entrenched in racial disparities and racial meanings, palliative schooling only reinforces social inequalities rather than disrupting them. I argue that the school’s racial equity strategies and the structural inequalities of the broader society underlie the individual practices of palliative schooling. My findings challenge what counts as and what facilitates “real” caring because progressive agendas may instead sustain social inequalities through a counterintuitive bond between caring and hopelessness.","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of colorblind racism has been central to understanding why racial inequalities persist in schools. However, I argue that merely increasing racial awareness through school policies, official and unofficial, does not alleviate educational racial inequalities. Ethnographic data from a progressive suburban high school reveal that some teachers’ responses to struggling marginalized students, in environments that promote racial equity, may be characterized as palliative schooling. Palliative schooling has two interrelated, core features: it prioritizes students’ immediate comfort as a form of caring, and it assumes a sense of hopelessness regarding what one can do to improve students’ situations. In this high school, entrenched in racial disparities and racial meanings, palliative schooling only reinforces social inequalities rather than disrupting them. I argue that the school’s racial equity strategies and the structural inequalities of the broader society underlie the individual practices of palliative schooling. My findings challenge what counts as and what facilitates “real” caring because progressive agendas may instead sustain social inequalities through a counterintuitive bond between caring and hopelessness.
胜利还是失败?种族平等时代缓和教育的困境
对种族歧视的研究一直是理解为什么种族不平等在学校持续存在的核心。然而,我认为仅仅通过官方和非官方的学校政策来提高种族意识并不能缓解教育中的种族不平等。来自一所进步的郊区高中的人种学数据显示,在促进种族平等的环境中,一些教师对挣扎的边缘化学生的反应可能被定性为姑息性教育。姑息性学校教育有两个相互关联的核心特征:它优先考虑学生的即时舒适,作为一种关心的形式,并且它假设一种无望感,即人们可以做些什么来改善学生的处境。在这所根深蒂固的种族差异和种族含义的高中,姑息教育只会加剧而不是破坏社会不平等。我认为学校的种族平等策略和更广泛社会的结构性不平等是姑息性教育的个人实践的基础。我的发现挑战了什么是“真正的”关怀,什么促进了“真正的”关怀,因为进步议程可能会通过关怀和绝望之间的反直觉联系来维持社会不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信