Sub-standard or Sub-legal? Distribution, Pharma Dossiers, and Fake-talk in India

Nishpriha Thakur
{"title":"Sub-standard or Sub-legal? Distribution, Pharma Dossiers, and Fake-talk in India","authors":"Nishpriha Thakur","doi":"10.17157/mat.10.3.7279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I look at Indian pharma ‘dossiers’—the bundles of paperwork that testify to pharmaceutical quality and adherence to regulatory standards—and how they illustrate a wider and ongoing shift from a paradigm of drug safety to one of drug security. By examining how dossiers enact and enable claims of ‘quality’, I argue that it is in a drug’s paperwork—rather than its chemical composition—that quality or fake-ness is produced. Based on interviews with Indian traders and officials, and an examination of how their work has changed over time in accordance with the regulatory shift to drug security, I show that in many instances the paperwork has come to be more important than the pill itself. This analysis contests the dominant pharmaco-regulatory notion of fake-ness, which privileges chemical composition above all else. In this way, my analysis of the dossier shows that drug security is itself a powerful form of fake-talk, one that informs the entire market and the conditions of possibility of international commerce today.","PeriodicalId":74160,"journal":{"name":"Medicine anthropology theory","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine anthropology theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.10.3.7279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article, I look at Indian pharma ‘dossiers’—the bundles of paperwork that testify to pharmaceutical quality and adherence to regulatory standards—and how they illustrate a wider and ongoing shift from a paradigm of drug safety to one of drug security. By examining how dossiers enact and enable claims of ‘quality’, I argue that it is in a drug’s paperwork—rather than its chemical composition—that quality or fake-ness is produced. Based on interviews with Indian traders and officials, and an examination of how their work has changed over time in accordance with the regulatory shift to drug security, I show that in many instances the paperwork has come to be more important than the pill itself. This analysis contests the dominant pharmaco-regulatory notion of fake-ness, which privileges chemical composition above all else. In this way, my analysis of the dossier shows that drug security is itself a powerful form of fake-talk, one that informs the entire market and the conditions of possibility of international commerce today.
不合标准还是不合法律?印度的分销、制药档案和假话
在这篇文章中,我研究了印度制药公司的“档案”——证明药品质量和遵守监管标准的大量文件——以及它们如何说明从药品安全范式到药品安全范式的更广泛和持续的转变。通过研究档案是如何制定和实现“质量”声明的,我认为是在药品的文件中,而不是其化学成分中,产生了质量或假冒。根据对印度商人和官员的采访,以及对他们的工作随着监管转向药物安全而发生变化的考察,我发现,在许多情况下,文书工作已经变得比药物本身更重要。这一分析挑战了药品监管中占主导地位的假药概念,该概念将化学成分置于一切之上。通过这种方式,我对档案的分析表明,毒品安全本身就是一种强大的虚假谈话形式,它告知了整个市场以及当今国际贸易可能性的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信