Interferencja mechanizmu systemu odpowiedzialności wprowadzonego dyrektywą 2019/790 na wolność wypowiedzi

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Ewa Milczarek
{"title":"Interferencja mechanizmu systemu odpowiedzialności wprowadzonego dyrektywą 2019/790 na wolność wypowiedzi","authors":"Ewa Milczarek","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.006.18118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet has fundamentally influenced all aspects of life – including culture, increasing access to such goods. This access has become faster, simpler and cost-free, including access from illegal sources, thus potentially violating the rights of creators. For years, public debate has raised the problem of the “copyright crisis”, which has been unable to meet the challenges of our information society. The EU’s response to increasing protection for creators is Directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. Article 17 of this directive imposes an obligation on providers of online content sharing services to preventively control content posted by users – the so-called liability mechanism. This preventive control raises concerns about the potential violation of users’ right to freedom of expression. The article analyzes the mechanisms of the liability system, including the identification of subjective and objective aspects of the imposed obligations. This analysis was compiled with the standards of protection and restriction of freedom of expression in the conditions of the information society. The aim of the work is to assess whether the mechanism of the accountability system violates the essence of freedom of expression.","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.006.18118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Internet has fundamentally influenced all aspects of life – including culture, increasing access to such goods. This access has become faster, simpler and cost-free, including access from illegal sources, thus potentially violating the rights of creators. For years, public debate has raised the problem of the “copyright crisis”, which has been unable to meet the challenges of our information society. The EU’s response to increasing protection for creators is Directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. Article 17 of this directive imposes an obligation on providers of online content sharing services to preventively control content posted by users – the so-called liability mechanism. This preventive control raises concerns about the potential violation of users’ right to freedom of expression. The article analyzes the mechanisms of the liability system, including the identification of subjective and objective aspects of the imposed obligations. This analysis was compiled with the standards of protection and restriction of freedom of expression in the conditions of the information society. The aim of the work is to assess whether the mechanism of the accountability system violates the essence of freedom of expression.
关于言论自由的第 2019/790 号指令引入的责任制度机制受到干扰
互联网从根本上影响了生活的方方面面——包括文化,增加了获取这些商品的途径。这种访问变得更快、更简单和免费,包括非法来源的访问,因此可能侵犯创作者的权利。多年来,公众一直在讨论“版权危机”的问题,这一问题已经无法应对我们信息社会的挑战。欧盟对加强对创作者的保护的回应是关于数字单一市场版权和相关权的第2019/790号指令。该指令第17条规定,在线内容共享服务提供商有义务对用户发布的内容进行预防性控制——即所谓的责任机制。这种预防性控制引起了人们对可能侵犯用户言论自由权的担忧。文章分析了责任制度的机制,包括对所加义务的主观和客观方面的认定。这一分析是根据信息社会条件下保护和限制言论自由的标准编制的。这项工作的目的是评估问责制的机制是否违反了言论自由的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
Santander Art and Culture Law Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信