Effect of Unsteady Fan-Intake Interaction On Short Intake Design

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Luca Boscagli, david G. MacManus, Robert Christie, Christopher T. J. Sheaf
{"title":"Effect of Unsteady Fan-Intake Interaction On Short Intake Design","authors":"Luca Boscagli, david G. MacManus, Robert Christie, Christopher T. J. Sheaf","doi":"10.1115/1.4063768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The next generation of ultrahigh bypass ratio civil aero-engines promises notable engine cycle benefits. However, these benefits can be significantly eroded by a possible increase in nacelle weight and drag due to the typical larger fan diameters. More compact nacelles, with shorter intakes, may be required to enable a net reduction in aero-engine fuel burn. The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of the design style of short intakes on the unsteady interaction under crosswind conditions between fan and intake, with a focus on the separation onset and characteristics of the boundary layer within the intake. Three intake designs were assessed, and a hierarchical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was used to determine and quantify primary aerodynamic interactions between the fan and the intake design. Similar to previous findings for a specific intake configuration, both intake flow unsteadiness and the unsteady upstream perturbations from the fan have a detrimental effect on the separation onset for the range of intake designs. The separation of the boundary layer within the intake was shock driven for the three different design styles. The simulations also quantified the unsteady intake flows with an emphasis on the spectral characteristics and engine-order signatures of the flow distortion. Overall, this work showed that is beneficial for the intake boundary layer to delay the diffusion closer to the fan and reduce the preshock Mach number to mitigate the adverse unsteady interaction between the fan and the shock.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The next generation of ultrahigh bypass ratio civil aero-engines promises notable engine cycle benefits. However, these benefits can be significantly eroded by a possible increase in nacelle weight and drag due to the typical larger fan diameters. More compact nacelles, with shorter intakes, may be required to enable a net reduction in aero-engine fuel burn. The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of the design style of short intakes on the unsteady interaction under crosswind conditions between fan and intake, with a focus on the separation onset and characteristics of the boundary layer within the intake. Three intake designs were assessed, and a hierarchical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was used to determine and quantify primary aerodynamic interactions between the fan and the intake design. Similar to previous findings for a specific intake configuration, both intake flow unsteadiness and the unsteady upstream perturbations from the fan have a detrimental effect on the separation onset for the range of intake designs. The separation of the boundary layer within the intake was shock driven for the three different design styles. The simulations also quantified the unsteady intake flows with an emphasis on the spectral characteristics and engine-order signatures of the flow distortion. Overall, this work showed that is beneficial for the intake boundary layer to delay the diffusion closer to the fan and reduce the preshock Mach number to mitigate the adverse unsteady interaction between the fan and the shock.
非定常风扇-进气相互作用对短进气设计的影响
下一代超高涵道比民用航空发动机具有显著的发动机循环效益。然而,由于典型的较大风扇直径,机舱重量和阻力可能会增加,这些优势可能会被显著削弱。更紧凑的机舱,更短的进气道,可能需要使航空发动机燃油消耗的净减少。本文的目的是评估短进气道设计风格对侧风条件下风扇与进气道之间非定常相互作用的影响,重点关注进气道内边界层的分离开始和特征。研究人员对三种进气设计进行了评估,并使用了分层计算流体动力学(CFD)方法来确定和量化风扇与进气设计之间的主要气动相互作用。与先前对特定进气配置的研究结果相似,进气流动不稳定和来自风扇的非定常上游扰动对进气设计范围内的分离开始都有不利影响。在三种不同的设计风格下,进气道内边界层的分离都是激波驱动的。模拟还量化了非定常进气流动,重点研究了流动畸变的谱特征和发动机阶特征。总的来说,这项工作表明,对于进气边界层来说,将扩散延迟到更靠近风扇的地方,降低预激波马赫数,以减轻风扇与激波之间不利的非定常相互作用是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信