Hope theory as resistance: narratives of South Asian scholars in Australian academia

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Nicola Sum, Reshmi Lahiri-Roy, Nish Belford
{"title":"Hope theory as resistance: narratives of South Asian scholars in Australian academia","authors":"Nicola Sum, Reshmi Lahiri-Roy, Nish Belford","doi":"10.1108/edi-03-2023-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Identity, positioning and possibilities intersect differently for South Asian women in white academia. Within a broader migrant community that defines Australian life, these identities and positioning imply great possibility, but pursuing such pathways within academia is a walk on the last strand of resilience. This paper explores this tension of possibilities and constraints, using hope theory to highlight the cognitive resistance evident in the narratives of three South Asian women in Australian academia. Design/methodology/approach The authors use collaborative autoethnography to share their narratives of working in Australian universities at three different stages of careers, utilising Snyder's model of hope theory to interrogate their own goal-setting behaviours, pathways and agentic thinking. Findings The authors propose that hope as a cognitive state informs resistance and enables aspirations to contribute within academia in meaningful ways whilst navigating the terrain of inequitable structures. Originality/value The authors' use of hope theory as a lens on the intersectional experiences of career making, building and progression is a new contribution to scholarship on marginalised women in white academe and the ways in which the pathways of resistance are identified.","PeriodicalId":46962,"journal":{"name":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","volume":"95 S1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-03-2023-0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Identity, positioning and possibilities intersect differently for South Asian women in white academia. Within a broader migrant community that defines Australian life, these identities and positioning imply great possibility, but pursuing such pathways within academia is a walk on the last strand of resilience. This paper explores this tension of possibilities and constraints, using hope theory to highlight the cognitive resistance evident in the narratives of three South Asian women in Australian academia. Design/methodology/approach The authors use collaborative autoethnography to share their narratives of working in Australian universities at three different stages of careers, utilising Snyder's model of hope theory to interrogate their own goal-setting behaviours, pathways and agentic thinking. Findings The authors propose that hope as a cognitive state informs resistance and enables aspirations to contribute within academia in meaningful ways whilst navigating the terrain of inequitable structures. Originality/value The authors' use of hope theory as a lens on the intersectional experiences of career making, building and progression is a new contribution to scholarship on marginalised women in white academe and the ways in which the pathways of resistance are identified.
作为抵抗的希望理论:澳大利亚学术界南亚学者的叙事
在白人学术界,南亚女性的身份、定位和可能性以不同的方式交织在一起。在定义澳大利亚生活的更广泛的移民社区中,这些身份和定位意味着巨大的可能性,但在学术界追求这样的道路是在最后一根弹性上行走。本文探讨了这种可能性与约束的张力,并运用希望理论来强调澳大利亚学术界三位南亚女性叙事中明显的认知阻力。作者使用协作式的自我民族志来分享他们在职业生涯的三个不同阶段在澳大利亚大学工作的叙述,利用斯奈德的希望理论模型来询问他们自己的目标设定行为,途径和代理思维。作者提出,希望作为一种认知状态,可以告知阻力,并使愿望在学术界以有意义的方式做出贡献,同时在不公平的结构中导航。原创性/价值作者将希望理论作为一种视角,审视职业生涯的形成、建立和发展的交叉经历,这对研究白人学术界边缘化女性的学术研究以及确定抵抗途径的方式做出了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信