Discussing ChatGPT’s implications for industry and higher education: The case for transdisciplinarity and digital humanities

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vera G. Dianova, Mario D. Schultz
{"title":"Discussing ChatGPT’s implications for industry and higher education: The case for transdisciplinarity and digital humanities","authors":"Vera G. Dianova, Mario D. Schultz","doi":"10.1177/09504222231199989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comment builds on the example of chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) to discuss the implications of generative AI on industry and higher education, underlining the need for more transdisciplinary digital literacy education. The release of ChatGPT has generated significant academic and professional interest and instigated a vibrant discussion on the opportunities offered and challenges posed by powerful and readily accessible generative AI reshaping teaching and learning at universities. ChatGPT has reignited an age-old debate on the impact of disruptive technologies on occupations and the labor market, but recent discussions have paid little attention to how university offerings may need to adapt. We strive to open this discussion arguing that while recent GPT technology has, indeed, made more conceivable the substitution of many tasks of white-collar and knowledge workers, and suggested an acceleration of the labor market shift towards technology-centric occupations, it has simultaneously made a stronger-than-ever case for transdisciplinary competences. Consequently, we emphasize the need to foster more transdisciplinary digital literacy in universities with curricula that provide breadth of knowledge and flexibility of mind, bridging humanities with STEM disciplines. Digital humanities education is in a unique position to promote the responsible use of generative AI, while encouraging critical reflection on its socio-cultural embeddedness.","PeriodicalId":46591,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Higher Education","volume":"2010 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231199989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comment builds on the example of chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) to discuss the implications of generative AI on industry and higher education, underlining the need for more transdisciplinary digital literacy education. The release of ChatGPT has generated significant academic and professional interest and instigated a vibrant discussion on the opportunities offered and challenges posed by powerful and readily accessible generative AI reshaping teaching and learning at universities. ChatGPT has reignited an age-old debate on the impact of disruptive technologies on occupations and the labor market, but recent discussions have paid little attention to how university offerings may need to adapt. We strive to open this discussion arguing that while recent GPT technology has, indeed, made more conceivable the substitution of many tasks of white-collar and knowledge workers, and suggested an acceleration of the labor market shift towards technology-centric occupations, it has simultaneously made a stronger-than-ever case for transdisciplinary competences. Consequently, we emphasize the need to foster more transdisciplinary digital literacy in universities with curricula that provide breadth of knowledge and flexibility of mind, bridging humanities with STEM disciplines. Digital humanities education is in a unique position to promote the responsible use of generative AI, while encouraging critical reflection on its socio-cultural embeddedness.
讨论ChatGPT对工业和高等教育的影响:跨学科和数字人文学科的案例
本文以聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)为例,讨论了生成式人工智能对工业和高等教育的影响,强调了对更多跨学科数字素养教育的需求。ChatGPT的发布引起了学术界和专业人士的极大兴趣,并引发了一场关于强大且易于获取的生成式人工智能重塑大学教学所带来的机遇和挑战的热烈讨论。ChatGPT重新点燃了一场古老的辩论,即颠覆性技术对职业和劳动力市场的影响,但最近的讨论很少关注大学课程可能需要如何适应。我们努力开启这一讨论,认为虽然最近的GPT技术确实使白领和知识工作者的许多任务的替代变得更容易想象,并表明劳动力市场加速向以技术为中心的职业转变,但它同时也为跨学科能力提供了比以往任何时候都更强有力的案例。因此,我们强调有必要通过提供知识广度和思维灵活性的课程,在人文学科与STEM学科之间架起桥梁,在大学中培养更多跨学科的数字素养。数字人文教育在促进负责任地使用生成式人工智能,同时鼓励对其社会文化嵌入性进行批判性反思方面处于独特地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industry and Higher Education
Industry and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Industry and Higher Education focuses on the multifaceted and complex relationships between higher education institutions and business and industry. It looks in detail at the processes and enactments of academia-business cooperation as well as examining the significance of that cooperation in wider contexts, such as regional development, entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems. While emphasizing the practical aspects of academia-business cooperation, IHE also locates practice in theoretical and research contexts, questioning received opinion and developing our understanding of what constitutes truly effective cooperation. Selected key topics Knowledge transfer - processes, mechanisms, successes and failures Research commercialization - from conception to product ''Graduate employability'' - definition, needs and methods Education for entrepreneurship - techniques, measurement and impact The role of the university in economic and social development The third mission and the entrepreneurial university Skills needs and the role of higher education Business-education partnerships for social and economic progress University-industry training and consultancy programmes Innovation networks and their role in furthering university-industry engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信