Trends in retirement and retirement income choices by TIAA participants: 2000–2018

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jeffrey R. Brown, James M. Poterba, David P. Richardson
{"title":"Trends in retirement and retirement income choices by TIAA participants: 2000–2018","authors":"Jeffrey R. Brown, James M. Poterba, David P. Richardson","doi":"10.1017/s1474747223000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper documents trends over the last two decades in retirement behavior and retirement income choices of participants in TIAA, a large and mature defined contribution plan. From 2000 and 2018, the average age at which TIAA participants stopped contributing to their accounts, which is a lower bound on their retirement age, rose by 1.2 years for female and 2.0 years for male participants. There is considerable variation in the elapsed time between the time of the last contribution to and the first income draw from plan accounts. Only 40% of participants take an initial income payment within 48 months of their last contribution. Later retirement and lags between retirement and the first retirement income payout led to a growing fraction of participants reaching the required minimum distribution (RMD) age before starting income draws. Between 2000 and 2018, the fraction of first-time income recipients who took no income until their RMD rose from 10% to 52%, while the fraction of these recipients who selected a life-contingent annuitized payout stream declined from 61% to 18%. Among those who began receiving income before age 70, annuitization rates were significantly higher than among those who did so at older ages. Aggregating across all income-receiving beneficiaries at TIAA, not just new income recipients, the proportion with a life annuity as part of their payout strategy fell from 52% in 2008 to 31% in 2018. By comparison, the proportion of all income recipients taking an RMD payment rose from 16% to 29%. About one-fifth of retirees received more than one type of income; the most common pairing was an RMD and a life annuity. In the later years of our sample, the RMD was becoming the de facto default distribution option for newly retired TIAA participants.","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747223000070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper documents trends over the last two decades in retirement behavior and retirement income choices of participants in TIAA, a large and mature defined contribution plan. From 2000 and 2018, the average age at which TIAA participants stopped contributing to their accounts, which is a lower bound on their retirement age, rose by 1.2 years for female and 2.0 years for male participants. There is considerable variation in the elapsed time between the time of the last contribution to and the first income draw from plan accounts. Only 40% of participants take an initial income payment within 48 months of their last contribution. Later retirement and lags between retirement and the first retirement income payout led to a growing fraction of participants reaching the required minimum distribution (RMD) age before starting income draws. Between 2000 and 2018, the fraction of first-time income recipients who took no income until their RMD rose from 10% to 52%, while the fraction of these recipients who selected a life-contingent annuitized payout stream declined from 61% to 18%. Among those who began receiving income before age 70, annuitization rates were significantly higher than among those who did so at older ages. Aggregating across all income-receiving beneficiaries at TIAA, not just new income recipients, the proportion with a life annuity as part of their payout strategy fell from 52% in 2008 to 31% in 2018. By comparison, the proportion of all income recipients taking an RMD payment rose from 16% to 29%. About one-fifth of retirees received more than one type of income; the most common pairing was an RMD and a life annuity. In the later years of our sample, the RMD was becoming the de facto default distribution option for newly retired TIAA participants.
2000-2018年TIAA参与者的退休和退休收入选择趋势
摘要本文研究了近20年TIAA计划参与者的退休行为和退休收入选择的变化趋势。从2000年到2018年,TIAA参与者停止向账户缴费的平均年龄(退休年龄的下限),女性增长了1.2岁,男性增长了2.0岁。最后一次供款的时间与第一次从计划帐户提取收入的时间之间的流逝时间有相当大的差异。只有40%的参与者在最后一次供款后的48个月内获得了首次收入。较晚的退休年龄和退休与第一次退休收入支付之间的滞后导致越来越多的参与者在开始领取收入之前达到最低分配年龄(RMD)。在2000年至2018年期间,首次收入领取者在RMD之前没有收入的比例从10%上升到52%,而选择终身或有年金支付流的比例从61%下降到18%。在70岁之前开始领取收入的人群中,年化率明显高于那些在更大年龄才开始领取收入的人群。综合所有TIAA的收入受益人,而不仅仅是新的收入接受者,将终身年金作为支付策略的一部分的比例从2008年的52%下降到2018年的31%。相比之下,所有收入领取者中领取RMD的比例从16%上升到29%。大约五分之一的退休人员有一种以上的收入;最常见的组合是RMD和终身年金。在我们样本的后期,RMD成为新退休的TIAA参与者事实上的默认分发选项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信